EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing

This study aimed to investigate; the students’ preferences toward the lecturer’s corrective feedback in the business letter writing and their reasons why they preferred for particular corrective feedback types. A case study was used by involving 15 EFL students who enrolled the Business Corresponden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: La Ode Sanu
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Samarinda 2016-12-01
Series:Dinamika Ilmu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/dinamika_ilmu/article/view/311
_version_ 1818649813613281280
author La Ode Sanu
author_facet La Ode Sanu
author_sort La Ode Sanu
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to investigate; the students’ preferences toward the lecturer’s corrective feedback in the business letter writing and their reasons why they preferred for particular corrective feedback types. A case study was used by involving 15 EFL students who enrolled the Business Correspondence Course. The questionnaire and interview were used as the research instruments. This study revealed that; (1) the students preferred to receive <em>lecturer correction</em> (M=5.00), followed by <em>lecturer-students conferencing</em> (M=4.13), <em>peer-correction</em> (M=2.73), <em>error identification</em> (M=2.00), <em>lecturer commentary</em> (M=1.93), and <em>self-correction</em> (M=1.27). (2) the students’ reasons at choosing the <em>lecturer correction</em> were getting the directly good correction from the lecturer, which it would be used as the reference/guide for further improvements both linguistic accuracy and business letter organization. In <em>lecturer-students conferencing, </em>beside they got good correction and grateful appreciation from both their lecturer and other students, they could learn and share the knowledge of errors made together; however they ashamed their linguistics errors, low ability and knowledge in formatting good business letter could be known by others. In<em> peer-correction</em>, the students got the unsatisfied and satisfied corrective feedback from their peers; and they were doubt with their peers’ ability and knowledge in giving correction. In <em>Error identification</em> and <em>lecturer commentary</em>, it was difficult for the students to diagnose the real errors and to correct them. Finally, the reasons of <em>self-correction</em> were useless and unsatisfied to evaluate their own work since they had limited ability and knowledge in formatting the business letter writing effectively.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:40:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-238c33e36aa44b90a9628dbe3388a636
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1411-3031
2442-9651
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:40:17Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Samarinda
record_format Article
series Dinamika Ilmu
spelling doaj.art-238c33e36aa44b90a9628dbe3388a6362022-12-21T22:08:20ZaraInstitut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) SamarindaDinamika Ilmu1411-30312442-96512016-12-0116222124310.21093/di.v16i2.311424EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters WritingLa Ode Sanu0Akademi Bahasa Asing Colorado SamarindaThis study aimed to investigate; the students’ preferences toward the lecturer’s corrective feedback in the business letter writing and their reasons why they preferred for particular corrective feedback types. A case study was used by involving 15 EFL students who enrolled the Business Correspondence Course. The questionnaire and interview were used as the research instruments. This study revealed that; (1) the students preferred to receive <em>lecturer correction</em> (M=5.00), followed by <em>lecturer-students conferencing</em> (M=4.13), <em>peer-correction</em> (M=2.73), <em>error identification</em> (M=2.00), <em>lecturer commentary</em> (M=1.93), and <em>self-correction</em> (M=1.27). (2) the students’ reasons at choosing the <em>lecturer correction</em> were getting the directly good correction from the lecturer, which it would be used as the reference/guide for further improvements both linguistic accuracy and business letter organization. In <em>lecturer-students conferencing, </em>beside they got good correction and grateful appreciation from both their lecturer and other students, they could learn and share the knowledge of errors made together; however they ashamed their linguistics errors, low ability and knowledge in formatting good business letter could be known by others. In<em> peer-correction</em>, the students got the unsatisfied and satisfied corrective feedback from their peers; and they were doubt with their peers’ ability and knowledge in giving correction. In <em>Error identification</em> and <em>lecturer commentary</em>, it was difficult for the students to diagnose the real errors and to correct them. Finally, the reasons of <em>self-correction</em> were useless and unsatisfied to evaluate their own work since they had limited ability and knowledge in formatting the business letter writing effectively.https://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/dinamika_ilmu/article/view/311Efl students' preferences, Corrective Feedback, and Business Letter Writing
spellingShingle La Ode Sanu
EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing
Dinamika Ilmu
Efl students' preferences, Corrective Feedback, and Business Letter Writing
title EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing
title_full EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing
title_fullStr EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing
title_full_unstemmed EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing
title_short EFL Students’ Preferences toward the Lecturer’s Corrective Feedback in Business Letters Writing
title_sort efl students preferences toward the lecturer s corrective feedback in business letters writing
topic Efl students' preferences, Corrective Feedback, and Business Letter Writing
url https://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/dinamika_ilmu/article/view/311
work_keys_str_mv AT laodesanu eflstudentspreferencestowardthelecturerscorrectivefeedbackinbusinessletterswriting