Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive

Pixel quality (PQ) products delivered with Analysis Ready Data (ARD) provide users with information about the conditions of the surface, atmosphere, and sensor at the time of acquisition. Knowing whether an observation was affected by clouds or sensor saturation is crucial when selecting data to inc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Ernst, Leo Lymburner, Josh Sixsmith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/10/1570
_version_ 1819002022818480128
author Stefan Ernst
Leo Lymburner
Josh Sixsmith
author_facet Stefan Ernst
Leo Lymburner
Josh Sixsmith
author_sort Stefan Ernst
collection DOAJ
description Pixel quality (PQ) products delivered with Analysis Ready Data (ARD) provide users with information about the conditions of the surface, atmosphere, and sensor at the time of acquisition. Knowing whether an observation was affected by clouds or sensor saturation is crucial when selecting data to include in automated analysis, as imperfect or erroneous observations are undesirable for most applications. There is, however, a certain rate of commission error in cloud detection, and saturation may not affect all spectral bands at a time, which can lead to suitable observations being excluded. This can have a substantial impact on the amount of data available for analysis. To understand how different surface types can affect cloud commission and saturation, we analyzed cloud and per-band saturation PQ flags for 31 years of Landsat data within Digital Earth Australia. Areas showing substantial reduction in observation density compared to their surroundings were investigated to characterize how specific surface types impact on the temporal density of observations deemed desirable. Using Fmask 3.2 by way of example, our approach demonstrates a method that can be applied to summarize the characteristics of cloud-screening algorithms and sensor saturation. Results indicate that cloud commission and sensor saturation rates show specific characteristics depending on the targets under observation. This potentially leads to an imbalance in data availability driven by surface type in a given study area. Based on our findings, the level of detail in PQ flags delivered with ARD is pivotal in maximizing the potential of EO data.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:58:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-238d1120459b413bad8dd09e6c51d2a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:58:30Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-238d1120459b413bad8dd09e6c51d2a22022-12-21T19:24:03ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922018-10-011010157010.3390/rs10101570rs10101570Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat ArchiveStefan Ernst0Leo Lymburner1Josh Sixsmith2Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, GermanyGeoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra ACT 2601, AustraliaGeoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra ACT 2601, AustraliaPixel quality (PQ) products delivered with Analysis Ready Data (ARD) provide users with information about the conditions of the surface, atmosphere, and sensor at the time of acquisition. Knowing whether an observation was affected by clouds or sensor saturation is crucial when selecting data to include in automated analysis, as imperfect or erroneous observations are undesirable for most applications. There is, however, a certain rate of commission error in cloud detection, and saturation may not affect all spectral bands at a time, which can lead to suitable observations being excluded. This can have a substantial impact on the amount of data available for analysis. To understand how different surface types can affect cloud commission and saturation, we analyzed cloud and per-band saturation PQ flags for 31 years of Landsat data within Digital Earth Australia. Areas showing substantial reduction in observation density compared to their surroundings were investigated to characterize how specific surface types impact on the temporal density of observations deemed desirable. Using Fmask 3.2 by way of example, our approach demonstrates a method that can be applied to summarize the characteristics of cloud-screening algorithms and sensor saturation. Results indicate that cloud commission and sensor saturation rates show specific characteristics depending on the targets under observation. This potentially leads to an imbalance in data availability driven by surface type in a given study area. Based on our findings, the level of detail in PQ flags delivered with ARD is pivotal in maximizing the potential of EO data.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/10/1570pixel qualityAnalysis Ready Datacloud maskingsaturationFmaskLandsat
spellingShingle Stefan Ernst
Leo Lymburner
Josh Sixsmith
Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive
Remote Sensing
pixel quality
Analysis Ready Data
cloud masking
saturation
Fmask
Landsat
title Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive
title_full Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive
title_fullStr Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive
title_short Implications of Pixel Quality Flags on the Observation Density of a Continental Landsat Archive
title_sort implications of pixel quality flags on the observation density of a continental landsat archive
topic pixel quality
Analysis Ready Data
cloud masking
saturation
Fmask
Landsat
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/10/1570
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanernst implicationsofpixelqualityflagsontheobservationdensityofacontinentallandsatarchive
AT leolymburner implicationsofpixelqualityflagsontheobservationdensityofacontinentallandsatarchive
AT joshsixsmith implicationsofpixelqualityflagsontheobservationdensityofacontinentallandsatarchive