Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization

Postural limb reflexes (PLRs) are an essential component of postural corrections. Spinalization leads to disappearance of postural functions (including PLRs). After spinalization, spastic, incorrectly phased motor responses to postural perturbations containing oscillatory EMG bursting gradually deve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pavel V. Zelenin, Vladimir F. Lyalka, Grigori N. Orlovsky, Tatiana G. Deliagina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00387/full
_version_ 1818042961913446400
author Pavel V. Zelenin
Vladimir F. Lyalka
Grigori N. Orlovsky
Tatiana G. Deliagina
author_facet Pavel V. Zelenin
Vladimir F. Lyalka
Grigori N. Orlovsky
Tatiana G. Deliagina
author_sort Pavel V. Zelenin
collection DOAJ
description Postural limb reflexes (PLRs) are an essential component of postural corrections. Spinalization leads to disappearance of postural functions (including PLRs). After spinalization, spastic, incorrectly phased motor responses to postural perturbations containing oscillatory EMG bursting gradually develop, suggesting plastic changes in the spinal postural networks. Here, to reveal these plastic changes, rabbits at 3, 7, and 30 days after spinalization at T12 were decerebrated, and responses of spinal interneurons from L5 along with hindlimb muscles EMG responses to postural sensory stimuli, causing PLRs in subjects with intact spinal cord (control), were characterized. Like in control and after acute spinalization, at each of three studied time points after spinalization, neurons responding to postural sensory stimuli were found. Proportion of such neurons during 1st month after spinalization did not reach the control level, and was similar to that observed after acute spinalization. In contrast, their activity (which was significantly decreased after acute spinalization) reached the control value at 3 days after spinalization and remained close to this level during the following month. However, the processing of postural sensory signals, which was severely distorted after acute spinalization, did not recover by 30 days after injury. In addition, we found a significant enhancement of the oscillatory activity in a proportion of the examined neurons, which could contribute to generation of oscillatory EMG bursting. Motor responses to postural stimuli (which were almost absent after acute spinalization) re-appeared at 3 days after spinalization, although they were very weak, irregular, and a half of them was incorrectly phased in relation to postural stimuli. Proportion of correct and incorrect motor responses remained almost the same during the following month, but their amplitude gradually increased. Thus, spinalization triggers two processes of plastic changes in the spinal postural networks: rapid (taking days) restoration of normal activity level in spinal interneurons, and slow (taking months) recovery of motoneuronal excitability. Most likely, recovery of interneuronal activity underlies re-appearance of motor responses to postural stimuli. However, absence of recovery of normal processing of postural sensory signals and enhancement of oscillatory activity of neurons result in abnormal PLRs and loss of postural functions.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:54:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-239b5cad305a424a8084faaaa9f1d20a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5102
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:54:38Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-239b5cad305a424a8084faaaa9f1d20a2022-12-22T01:55:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience1662-51022019-08-011310.3389/fncel.2019.00387472432Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After SpinalizationPavel V. ZeleninVladimir F. LyalkaGrigori N. OrlovskyTatiana G. DeliaginaPostural limb reflexes (PLRs) are an essential component of postural corrections. Spinalization leads to disappearance of postural functions (including PLRs). After spinalization, spastic, incorrectly phased motor responses to postural perturbations containing oscillatory EMG bursting gradually develop, suggesting plastic changes in the spinal postural networks. Here, to reveal these plastic changes, rabbits at 3, 7, and 30 days after spinalization at T12 were decerebrated, and responses of spinal interneurons from L5 along with hindlimb muscles EMG responses to postural sensory stimuli, causing PLRs in subjects with intact spinal cord (control), were characterized. Like in control and after acute spinalization, at each of three studied time points after spinalization, neurons responding to postural sensory stimuli were found. Proportion of such neurons during 1st month after spinalization did not reach the control level, and was similar to that observed after acute spinalization. In contrast, their activity (which was significantly decreased after acute spinalization) reached the control value at 3 days after spinalization and remained close to this level during the following month. However, the processing of postural sensory signals, which was severely distorted after acute spinalization, did not recover by 30 days after injury. In addition, we found a significant enhancement of the oscillatory activity in a proportion of the examined neurons, which could contribute to generation of oscillatory EMG bursting. Motor responses to postural stimuli (which were almost absent after acute spinalization) re-appeared at 3 days after spinalization, although they were very weak, irregular, and a half of them was incorrectly phased in relation to postural stimuli. Proportion of correct and incorrect motor responses remained almost the same during the following month, but their amplitude gradually increased. Thus, spinalization triggers two processes of plastic changes in the spinal postural networks: rapid (taking days) restoration of normal activity level in spinal interneurons, and slow (taking months) recovery of motoneuronal excitability. Most likely, recovery of interneuronal activity underlies re-appearance of motor responses to postural stimuli. However, absence of recovery of normal processing of postural sensory signals and enhancement of oscillatory activity of neurons result in abnormal PLRs and loss of postural functions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00387/fullspinal cord injurybalance controlpostural reflexesspinal neuronsspinal networksspasticity
spellingShingle Pavel V. Zelenin
Vladimir F. Lyalka
Grigori N. Orlovsky
Tatiana G. Deliagina
Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
spinal cord injury
balance control
postural reflexes
spinal neurons
spinal networks
spasticity
title Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization
title_full Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization
title_fullStr Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization
title_short Changes in Activity of Spinal Postural Networks at Different Time Points After Spinalization
title_sort changes in activity of spinal postural networks at different time points after spinalization
topic spinal cord injury
balance control
postural reflexes
spinal neurons
spinal networks
spasticity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00387/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelvzelenin changesinactivityofspinalposturalnetworksatdifferenttimepointsafterspinalization
AT vladimirflyalka changesinactivityofspinalposturalnetworksatdifferenttimepointsafterspinalization
AT grigorinorlovsky changesinactivityofspinalposturalnetworksatdifferenttimepointsafterspinalization
AT tatianagdeliagina changesinactivityofspinalposturalnetworksatdifferenttimepointsafterspinalization