The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model

Abstract We conduct a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM), land model (ELM) to calculate the sensitivity of five key carbon cycle outputs to 68 model parameters. This GSA is conducted by first constructing a Polynomial Chaos (PC) surrogate via new Weigh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Ricciuto, Khachik Sargsyan, Peter Thornton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2018-02-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000962
_version_ 1811285481824976896
author Daniel Ricciuto
Khachik Sargsyan
Peter Thornton
author_facet Daniel Ricciuto
Khachik Sargsyan
Peter Thornton
author_sort Daniel Ricciuto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We conduct a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM), land model (ELM) to calculate the sensitivity of five key carbon cycle outputs to 68 model parameters. This GSA is conducted by first constructing a Polynomial Chaos (PC) surrogate via new Weighted Iterative Bayesian Compressive Sensing (WIBCS) algorithm for adaptive basis growth leading to a sparse, high‐dimensional PC surrogate with 3,000 model evaluations. The PC surrogate allows efficient extraction of GSA information leading to further dimensionality reduction. The GSA is performed at 96 FLUXNET sites covering multiple plant functional types (PFTs) and climate conditions. About 20 of the model parameters are identified as sensitive with the rest being relatively insensitive across all outputs and PFTs. These sensitivities are dependent on PFT, and are relatively consistent among sites within the same PFT. The five model outputs have a majority of their highly sensitive parameters in common. A common subset of sensitive parameters is also shared among PFTs, but some parameters are specific to certain types (e.g., deciduous phenology). The relative importance of these parameters shifts significantly among PFTs and with climatic variables such as mean annual temperature.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:44:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-239cc587adc64b009a627503838bb37a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1942-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:44:44Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj.art-239cc587adc64b009a627503838bb37a2022-12-22T03:06:05ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662018-02-0110229731910.1002/2017MS000962The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land ModelDaniel Ricciuto0Khachik Sargsyan1Peter Thornton2Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge TN USASandia National LaboratoriesLivermore CA USAOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge TN USAAbstract We conduct a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM), land model (ELM) to calculate the sensitivity of five key carbon cycle outputs to 68 model parameters. This GSA is conducted by first constructing a Polynomial Chaos (PC) surrogate via new Weighted Iterative Bayesian Compressive Sensing (WIBCS) algorithm for adaptive basis growth leading to a sparse, high‐dimensional PC surrogate with 3,000 model evaluations. The PC surrogate allows efficient extraction of GSA information leading to further dimensionality reduction. The GSA is performed at 96 FLUXNET sites covering multiple plant functional types (PFTs) and climate conditions. About 20 of the model parameters are identified as sensitive with the rest being relatively insensitive across all outputs and PFTs. These sensitivities are dependent on PFT, and are relatively consistent among sites within the same PFT. The five model outputs have a majority of their highly sensitive parameters in common. A common subset of sensitive parameters is also shared among PFTs, but some parameters are specific to certain types (e.g., deciduous phenology). The relative importance of these parameters shifts significantly among PFTs and with climatic variables such as mean annual temperature.https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000962land‐surface modeluncertainty quantificationparameter sensitivitybiogeochemistry
spellingShingle Daniel Ricciuto
Khachik Sargsyan
Peter Thornton
The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
land‐surface model
uncertainty quantification
parameter sensitivity
biogeochemistry
title The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model
title_full The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model
title_fullStr The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model
title_short The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model
title_sort impact of parametric uncertainties on biogeochemistry in the e3sm land model
topic land‐surface model
uncertainty quantification
parameter sensitivity
biogeochemistry
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000962
work_keys_str_mv AT danielricciuto theimpactofparametricuncertaintiesonbiogeochemistryinthee3smlandmodel
AT khachiksargsyan theimpactofparametricuncertaintiesonbiogeochemistryinthee3smlandmodel
AT peterthornton theimpactofparametricuncertaintiesonbiogeochemistryinthee3smlandmodel
AT danielricciuto impactofparametricuncertaintiesonbiogeochemistryinthee3smlandmodel
AT khachiksargsyan impactofparametricuncertaintiesonbiogeochemistryinthee3smlandmodel
AT peterthornton impactofparametricuncertaintiesonbiogeochemistryinthee3smlandmodel