Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs

The question about the types of semantic relations extractable by the Web-service RusVectōrēs is considered. The research urgency is caused by insufficient state of knowledge about linguistic potential of this instrument and distributive semantics in whole. The novelty of the research is seen in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. K. Timofeeva
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018-08-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/873
_version_ 1797245881903218688
author M. K. Timofeeva
author_facet M. K. Timofeeva
author_sort M. K. Timofeeva
collection DOAJ
description The question about the types of semantic relations extractable by the Web-service RusVectōrēs is considered. The research urgency is caused by insufficient state of knowledge about linguistic potential of this instrument and distributive semantics in whole. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the problem concerning typology of semantic relations extractable on the base of distributional semantics - that is the method that uses automatic processing of big textual data without taking into account linguistic information - is posed for the first time. Classification of semantic relations including eight types of paradigmatic and three types of syntagmatic relations is proposed. It is shown that application of the method under consideration provides the set of semantic associates that consists predominantly of the words that stand in paradigmatic relations with the entry word; and among them hyponyms or co-hyponyms are the most frequent. The question about an effect that the semantic group of the entry word may have on the types of extractable semantic relations is studied. It is shown that the effect can be traced, although it needs additional investigations on more representative data for further specification. The comparative analysis of five semantic groups of the words gave evidence for the abovementioned general trend (about predominance of hyponyms and co-hyponyms) and allowed to produce several specific hypothesis about correlations between the semantic type of an entry word and the types of semantic relations extracted for the word.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:31:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-239cc9bfd99142469fdd2005fc1373d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:33:57Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj.art-239cc9bfd99142469fdd2005fc1373d22024-03-25T14:30:56ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952018-08-0108748710.24224/2227-1295-2018-8-74-87869Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēsM. K. Timofeeva0Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State UniversityThe question about the types of semantic relations extractable by the Web-service RusVectōrēs is considered. The research urgency is caused by insufficient state of knowledge about linguistic potential of this instrument and distributive semantics in whole. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the problem concerning typology of semantic relations extractable on the base of distributional semantics - that is the method that uses automatic processing of big textual data without taking into account linguistic information - is posed for the first time. Classification of semantic relations including eight types of paradigmatic and three types of syntagmatic relations is proposed. It is shown that application of the method under consideration provides the set of semantic associates that consists predominantly of the words that stand in paradigmatic relations with the entry word; and among them hyponyms or co-hyponyms are the most frequent. The question about an effect that the semantic group of the entry word may have on the types of extractable semantic relations is studied. It is shown that the effect can be traced, although it needs additional investigations on more representative data for further specification. The comparative analysis of five semantic groups of the words gave evidence for the abovementioned general trend (about predominance of hyponyms and co-hyponyms) and allowed to produce several specific hypothesis about correlations between the semantic type of an entry word and the types of semantic relations extracted for the word.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/873rusvectōrēssemantic relationslexisdistributional semanticsautomatic text processingnounsrusvectōrēs
spellingShingle M. K. Timofeeva
Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs
Научный диалог
rusvectōrēs
semantic relations
lexis
distributional semantics
automatic text processing
nouns
rusvectōrēs
title Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs
title_full Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs
title_fullStr Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs
title_full_unstemmed Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs
title_short Typology of Semantic Relations Extracted by the Instrument RusVectōrēs
title_sort typology of semantic relations extracted by the instrument rusvectores
topic rusvectōrēs
semantic relations
lexis
distributional semantics
automatic text processing
nouns
rusvectōrēs
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/873
work_keys_str_mv AT mktimofeeva typologyofsemanticrelationsextractedbytheinstrumentrusvectores