АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS

In contemporary astronomical literature, there is no uniform definition of the term asterism. This inconsistency is the consequence of differences between traditional understanding of the term constellation, from the standpoint of the naked eye astronomy, and its contemporary understanding from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zorica Prnjat, Milutin Tadić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" SASA 2017-04-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Geografski institut "Jovan Cvijić"
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gi.sanu.ac.rs/zbornik/index.php/zbornik/article/view/19
_version_ 1797642759288389632
author Zorica Prnjat
Milutin Tadić
author_facet Zorica Prnjat
Milutin Tadić
author_sort Zorica Prnjat
collection DOAJ
description In contemporary astronomical literature, there is no uniform definition of the term asterism. This inconsistency is the consequence of differences between traditional understanding of the term constellation, from the standpoint of the naked eye astronomy, and its contemporary understanding from the standpoint of the International Astronomical Union. A traditional constellation is a recognizable star configuration with a well-established name, whereas the International Astronomical Union defines a constellation as an exactly defined sector of the cosmic space that belongs to a particular traditional constellation. Asterism is a lower rank term in comparison to constellation, and as such it may not denote a whole traditional constellation, as these terms would become synonymous and parts of constellations would become “asterisms of asterisms“. Similarly, asterism cannot define a macro configuration composed of the brightest stars in more constellations, thus, the Summer Triangle and other sky polygons are not asterisms. Therefore, asterisms are neither constellations nor sky polygons, but the third – easily recognizable parts of traditional constellations with historically well-established names, including separate groups of smaller stars that belong to star clusters (autonomous asterisms). Forms and names of asterisms may or may not be consistent with the parent constellation, and accordingly asterisms can be divided into compatible and incompatible. If asterisms have outlived the exact division of the celestial sphere and remained irreplaceable celestial landmarks in the naked eye astronomy, it is high time for the International Astronomical Union to agree on the definition of asterism and to compile their official list.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:04:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-239e0766f82d401b98d8be7652bc6357
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0350-7599
1821-2808
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:04:56Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" SASA
record_format Article
series Zbornik Radova: Geografski institut "Jovan Cvijić"
spelling doaj.art-239e0766f82d401b98d8be7652bc63572023-11-02T02:25:25ZengGeographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" SASAZbornik Radova: Geografski institut "Jovan Cvijić"0350-75991821-28082017-04-0167111011АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMASZorica Prnjat0Milutin Tadić1Faculty of Geography University of BelgradeFaculty of Geography University of BelgradeIn contemporary astronomical literature, there is no uniform definition of the term asterism. This inconsistency is the consequence of differences between traditional understanding of the term constellation, from the standpoint of the naked eye astronomy, and its contemporary understanding from the standpoint of the International Astronomical Union. A traditional constellation is a recognizable star configuration with a well-established name, whereas the International Astronomical Union defines a constellation as an exactly defined sector of the cosmic space that belongs to a particular traditional constellation. Asterism is a lower rank term in comparison to constellation, and as such it may not denote a whole traditional constellation, as these terms would become synonymous and parts of constellations would become “asterisms of asterisms“. Similarly, asterism cannot define a macro configuration composed of the brightest stars in more constellations, thus, the Summer Triangle and other sky polygons are not asterisms. Therefore, asterisms are neither constellations nor sky polygons, but the third – easily recognizable parts of traditional constellations with historically well-established names, including separate groups of smaller stars that belong to star clusters (autonomous asterisms). Forms and names of asterisms may or may not be consistent with the parent constellation, and accordingly asterisms can be divided into compatible and incompatible. If asterisms have outlived the exact division of the celestial sphere and remained irreplaceable celestial landmarks in the naked eye astronomy, it is high time for the International Astronomical Union to agree on the definition of asterism and to compile their official list.http://www.gi.sanu.ac.rs/zbornik/index.php/zbornik/article/view/19asterismconstellationstarconfigurationsky polygonnaked eye astronomy
spellingShingle Zorica Prnjat
Milutin Tadić
АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS
Zbornik Radova: Geografski institut "Jovan Cvijić"
asterism
constellation
star
configuration
sky polygon
naked eye astronomy
title АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS
title_full АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS
title_fullStr АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS
title_full_unstemmed АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS
title_short АSTERISM AND CONSTELLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL DILEMMAS
title_sort аsterism and constellation terminological dilemmas
topic asterism
constellation
star
configuration
sky polygon
naked eye astronomy
url http://www.gi.sanu.ac.rs/zbornik/index.php/zbornik/article/view/19
work_keys_str_mv AT zoricaprnjat asterismandconstellationterminologicaldilemmas
AT milutintadic asterismandconstellationterminologicaldilemmas