Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal

Abstract Background The intrapartum period is a time of high mortality risk for newborns and mothers. Numerous interventions exist to minimize risk during this period. Data on intervention coverage are needed for health system improvement. Maternal report of intrapartum interventions through surveys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily D. Carter, Karen T. Chang, Luke C. Mullany, Subarna K. Khatry, Steven C. LeClerq, Melinda K. Munos, Joanne Katz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03547-5
_version_ 1831647119283322880
author Emily D. Carter
Karen T. Chang
Luke C. Mullany
Subarna K. Khatry
Steven C. LeClerq
Melinda K. Munos
Joanne Katz
author_facet Emily D. Carter
Karen T. Chang
Luke C. Mullany
Subarna K. Khatry
Steven C. LeClerq
Melinda K. Munos
Joanne Katz
author_sort Emily D. Carter
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The intrapartum period is a time of high mortality risk for newborns and mothers. Numerous interventions exist to minimize risk during this period. Data on intervention coverage are needed for health system improvement. Maternal report of intrapartum interventions through surveys is the primary source of coverage data, but they may be invalid or unreliable. Methods We assessed the reliability of maternal report of delivery and immediate newborn care for a sample of home and health facility births in Sarlahi, Nepal. Mothers were visited as soon as possible following delivery (< 72 h) and asked to report circumstances of labor and delivery. A subset was revisited 1–24 months after delivery and asked to recall interventions received using standard household survey questions. We assessed the reliability of each indicator by comparing what mothers reported immediately after delivery against what they reported at the follow-up survey. We assessed potential variation in reliability of maternal report by characteristics of the mother, birth event, or intervention prevalence. Results One thousand five hundred two mother/child pairs were included in the reliability study, with approximately half of births occurring at home. A higher proportion of women who delivered in facilities reported “don’t know” when asked to recall specific interventions both initially and at follow-up. Most indicators had high observed percent agreement, but kappa values were below 0.4, indicating agreement was primarily due to chance. Only “received any injection during delivery” demonstrated high reliability among all births (kappa: 0.737). The reliability of maternal report was typically lower among women who delivered at a facility. There was no difference in reliability based on time since birth of the follow-up interview. We observed over-reporting of interventions at follow-up that were more common in the population and under-reporting of less common interventions. Conclusions This study reinforces previous findings that mothers are unable to report reliably on many interventions within the peripartum period. Household surveys which rely on maternal report, therefore, may not be an appropriate method for collecting data on coverage of many interventions during the peripartum period. This is particularly true among facility births, where many interventions may occur without the mother’s full knowledge.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T14:08:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23a2a0e8c2b04135956c9a8c93b5967d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T14:08:23Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-23a2a0e8c2b04135956c9a8c93b5967d2022-12-21T20:18:14ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-01-0121111310.1186/s12884-021-03547-5Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, NepalEmily D. Carter0Karen T. Chang1Luke C. Mullany2Subarna K. Khatry3Steven C. LeClerq4Melinda K. Munos5Joanne Katz6Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDivision of Reproductive Health, CDC National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthNepal Nutrition Intervention Project–SarlahiDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthAbstract Background The intrapartum period is a time of high mortality risk for newborns and mothers. Numerous interventions exist to minimize risk during this period. Data on intervention coverage are needed for health system improvement. Maternal report of intrapartum interventions through surveys is the primary source of coverage data, but they may be invalid or unreliable. Methods We assessed the reliability of maternal report of delivery and immediate newborn care for a sample of home and health facility births in Sarlahi, Nepal. Mothers were visited as soon as possible following delivery (< 72 h) and asked to report circumstances of labor and delivery. A subset was revisited 1–24 months after delivery and asked to recall interventions received using standard household survey questions. We assessed the reliability of each indicator by comparing what mothers reported immediately after delivery against what they reported at the follow-up survey. We assessed potential variation in reliability of maternal report by characteristics of the mother, birth event, or intervention prevalence. Results One thousand five hundred two mother/child pairs were included in the reliability study, with approximately half of births occurring at home. A higher proportion of women who delivered in facilities reported “don’t know” when asked to recall specific interventions both initially and at follow-up. Most indicators had high observed percent agreement, but kappa values were below 0.4, indicating agreement was primarily due to chance. Only “received any injection during delivery” demonstrated high reliability among all births (kappa: 0.737). The reliability of maternal report was typically lower among women who delivered at a facility. There was no difference in reliability based on time since birth of the follow-up interview. We observed over-reporting of interventions at follow-up that were more common in the population and under-reporting of less common interventions. Conclusions This study reinforces previous findings that mothers are unable to report reliably on many interventions within the peripartum period. Household surveys which rely on maternal report, therefore, may not be an appropriate method for collecting data on coverage of many interventions during the peripartum period. This is particularly true among facility births, where many interventions may occur without the mother’s full knowledge.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03547-5BirthIntrapartumRecallReliabilitySurvey
spellingShingle Emily D. Carter
Karen T. Chang
Luke C. Mullany
Subarna K. Khatry
Steven C. LeClerq
Melinda K. Munos
Joanne Katz
Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Birth
Intrapartum
Recall
Reliability
Survey
title Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal
title_full Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal
title_fullStr Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal
title_short Reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in Sarlahi, Nepal
title_sort reliability of maternal recall of delivery and immediate newborn care indicators in sarlahi nepal
topic Birth
Intrapartum
Recall
Reliability
Survey
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03547-5
work_keys_str_mv AT emilydcarter reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal
AT karentchang reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal
AT lukecmullany reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal
AT subarnakkhatry reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal
AT stevencleclerq reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal
AT melindakmunos reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal
AT joannekatz reliabilityofmaternalrecallofdeliveryandimmediatenewborncareindicatorsinsarlahinepal