Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial.
<h4>Background</h4>Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection testing (e-STI testing) is increasingly available as an alternative to testing in clinics. Typically this testing modality enables users to order a test kit from a virtual service (via a website or app), collect their ow...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479 |
| _version_ | 1818578296117395456 |
|---|---|
| author | Emma Wilson Caroline Free Tim P Morris Jonathan Syred Irrfan Ahamed Anatole S Menon-Johansson Melissa J Palmer Sharmani Barnard Emma Rezel Paula Baraitser |
| author_facet | Emma Wilson Caroline Free Tim P Morris Jonathan Syred Irrfan Ahamed Anatole S Menon-Johansson Melissa J Palmer Sharmani Barnard Emma Rezel Paula Baraitser |
| author_sort | Emma Wilson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection testing (e-STI testing) is increasingly available as an alternative to testing in clinics. Typically this testing modality enables users to order a test kit from a virtual service (via a website or app), collect their own samples, return test samples to a laboratory, and be notified of their results by short message service (SMS) or telephone. e-STI testing is assumed to increase access to testing in comparison with face-to-face services, but the evidence is unclear. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of an e-STI testing and results service (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, HIV, and syphilis) on STI testing uptake and STI cases diagnosed.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>The study took place in the London boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark. Between 24 November 2014 and 31 August 2015, we recruited 2,072 participants, aged 16-30 years, who were resident in these boroughs, had at least 1 sexual partner in the last 12 months, stated willingness to take an STI test, and had access to the internet. Those unable to provide consent and unable to read English were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or to receive 1 text message with the web link of a bespoke website listing the locations, contact details, and websites of 7 local sexual health clinics (control group). Participants were free to use any other services or interventions during the study period. The primary outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and self-reported STI diagnosis at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants prescribed treatment for an STI, time from randomisation to completion of an STI test, and time from randomisation to treatment of an STI. Participants were sent a £10 cash incentive on submission of self-reported data. We completed all follow-up, including patient record checks, by 17 June 2016. Uptake of STI testing was increased in the intervention group at 6 weeks (50.0% versus 26.6%, relative risk [RR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.15, P < 0.001). The proportion of participants diagnosed was 2.8% in the intervention group versus 1.4% in the control group (RR 2.10, 95% CI 0.94 to 4.70, P = 0.079). No evidence of heterogeneity was observed for any of the pre-specified subgroup analyses. The proportion of participants treated was 1.1% in the intervention group versus 0.7% in the control group (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.71 to 4.16, P = 0.231). Time to test, was shorter in the intervention group compared to the control group (28.8 days versus 36.5 days, P < 0.001, test for difference in restricted mean survival time [RMST]), but no differences were observed for time to treatment (83.2 days versus 83.5 days, P = 0.51, test for difference in RMST). We were unable to recruit the planned 3,000 participants and therefore lacked power for the analyses of STI diagnoses and STI cases treated.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The e-STI testing service increased uptake of STI testing for all groups including high-risk groups. The intervention required people to attend clinic for treatment and did not reduce time to treatment. Service innovations to improve treatment rates for those diagnosed online are required and could include e-treatment and postal treatment services. e-STI testing services require long-term monitoring and evaluation.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN13354298. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T06:43:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-23b20ad5821d421ba3f8a8c9a3b3a522 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T06:43:33Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-23b20ad5821d421ba3f8a8c9a3b3a5222022-12-21T22:40:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762017-12-011412e100247910.1371/journal.pmed.1002479Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial.Emma WilsonCaroline FreeTim P MorrisJonathan SyredIrrfan AhamedAnatole S Menon-JohanssonMelissa J PalmerSharmani BarnardEmma RezelPaula Baraitser<h4>Background</h4>Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection testing (e-STI testing) is increasingly available as an alternative to testing in clinics. Typically this testing modality enables users to order a test kit from a virtual service (via a website or app), collect their own samples, return test samples to a laboratory, and be notified of their results by short message service (SMS) or telephone. e-STI testing is assumed to increase access to testing in comparison with face-to-face services, but the evidence is unclear. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of an e-STI testing and results service (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, HIV, and syphilis) on STI testing uptake and STI cases diagnosed.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>The study took place in the London boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark. Between 24 November 2014 and 31 August 2015, we recruited 2,072 participants, aged 16-30 years, who were resident in these boroughs, had at least 1 sexual partner in the last 12 months, stated willingness to take an STI test, and had access to the internet. Those unable to provide consent and unable to read English were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or to receive 1 text message with the web link of a bespoke website listing the locations, contact details, and websites of 7 local sexual health clinics (control group). Participants were free to use any other services or interventions during the study period. The primary outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and self-reported STI diagnosis at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants prescribed treatment for an STI, time from randomisation to completion of an STI test, and time from randomisation to treatment of an STI. Participants were sent a £10 cash incentive on submission of self-reported data. We completed all follow-up, including patient record checks, by 17 June 2016. Uptake of STI testing was increased in the intervention group at 6 weeks (50.0% versus 26.6%, relative risk [RR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.15, P < 0.001). The proportion of participants diagnosed was 2.8% in the intervention group versus 1.4% in the control group (RR 2.10, 95% CI 0.94 to 4.70, P = 0.079). No evidence of heterogeneity was observed for any of the pre-specified subgroup analyses. The proportion of participants treated was 1.1% in the intervention group versus 0.7% in the control group (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.71 to 4.16, P = 0.231). Time to test, was shorter in the intervention group compared to the control group (28.8 days versus 36.5 days, P < 0.001, test for difference in restricted mean survival time [RMST]), but no differences were observed for time to treatment (83.2 days versus 83.5 days, P = 0.51, test for difference in RMST). We were unable to recruit the planned 3,000 participants and therefore lacked power for the analyses of STI diagnoses and STI cases treated.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The e-STI testing service increased uptake of STI testing for all groups including high-risk groups. The intervention required people to attend clinic for treatment and did not reduce time to treatment. Service innovations to improve treatment rates for those diagnosed online are required and could include e-treatment and postal treatment services. e-STI testing services require long-term monitoring and evaluation.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN13354298.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479 |
| spellingShingle | Emma Wilson Caroline Free Tim P Morris Jonathan Syred Irrfan Ahamed Anatole S Menon-Johansson Melissa J Palmer Sharmani Barnard Emma Rezel Paula Baraitser Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. PLoS Medicine |
| title | Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. |
| title_full | Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. |
| title_fullStr | Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. |
| title_short | Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. |
| title_sort | internet accessed sexually transmitted infection e sti testing and results service a randomised single blind controlled trial |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emmawilson internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT carolinefree internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT timpmorris internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT jonathansyred internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT irrfanahamed internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT anatolesmenonjohansson internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT melissajpalmer internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT sharmanibarnard internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT emmarezel internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial AT paulabaraitser internetaccessedsexuallytransmittedinfectionestitestingandresultsservicearandomisedsingleblindcontrolledtrial |