Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina

Retinal prostheses are a promising therapeutic intervention for patients afflicted by outer retinal degenerative diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa and age‐related macular degeneration. Although significant advances in the development of retinal implants have been made, the quality of vision elic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vineeth Raghuram, Paul Werginz, Shelley I. Fried, Brian P. Timko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2021-12-01
Series:Advanced NanoBiomed Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202100069
Description
Summary:Retinal prostheses are a promising therapeutic intervention for patients afflicted by outer retinal degenerative diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa and age‐related macular degeneration. Although significant advances in the development of retinal implants have been made, the quality of vision elicited by these devices remains largely suboptimal. The variability in the responses produced by retinal devices is most likely due to the differences between the natural cell‐type‐specific signaling that occur in the healthy retina versus the nonspecific activation of multiple cell types arising from artificial stimulation. To replicate these natural signaling patterns, stimulation strategies must be capable of preferentially activating specific retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types. To design more selective stimulation strategies, a better understanding of the morphological factors that underlie the sensitivity to prosthetic stimulation must be developed. Herein, the role that different anatomical components play in driving the direct activation of RGCs by extracellular stimulation is focused on. Briefly, 1) the variability in morphological properties of α‐RGCs is characterized, 2) the influence of morphology on the direct activation of RGCs by electric stimulation is detailed, and 3) some of the potential biophysical mechanisms that could explain differences in activation thresholds and electrically evoked responses between RGC types are described.
ISSN:2699-9307