Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP
Software evaluation and selection have begun to be addressed as a topic title along with the fact that microcomputers and then personal computers have become widespread and have been used in the operations of businesses. In this study, it was focused on the selection of software for identifying the...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Iranian Institute of Research and Development in Chemical Industries (IRDCI)-ACECR
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijcce.ac.ir/article_34118_c1546ba067056320b084d215df0414fe.pdf |
_version_ | 1818559594702569472 |
---|---|
author | Saliha Çetinyokuş Emre Çalışkan Erdem Aksakal Tahsin Çetinyokuş |
author_facet | Saliha Çetinyokuş Emre Çalışkan Erdem Aksakal Tahsin Çetinyokuş |
author_sort | Saliha Çetinyokuş |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Software evaluation and selection have begun to be addressed as a topic title along with the fact that microcomputers and then personal computers have become widespread and have been used in the operations of businesses. In this study, it was focused on the selection of software for identifying the physical effect distances of the explosion, fire, and toxic emission, which is an important need for industrial institutions containing, using or storing hazardous chemicals. The evaluation and selection of software for the Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) of potential accidents was studied at first. In means of methodology, questionnaires consisting of original questions were applied to the experts. The results obtained from questionnaires according to the Likert scale, were converted into Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) suggestion matrices. In this way, the inconsistency problem in the pairwise comparison matrices was eliminated. As a result, evaluation and selection were made among the HACM software. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T00:27:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-23ccf09a78ea487b9f197b4c10865c63 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1021-9986 1021-9986 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T00:27:35Z |
publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
publisher | Iranian Institute of Research and Development in Chemical Industries (IRDCI)-ACECR |
record_format | Article |
series | Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-23ccf09a78ea487b9f197b4c10865c632022-12-21T23:25:00ZengIranian Institute of Research and Development in Chemical Industries (IRDCI)-ACECRIranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering1021-99861021-99862020-06-0139330331810.30492/ijcce.2020.3411834118Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHPSaliha Çetinyokuş0Emre Çalışkan1Erdem Aksakal2Tahsin Çetinyokuş3Gazi University, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Material and Material Processing Technologies Ankara, TURKEYGazi University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ankara, TURKEYAtatürk University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Erzurum, TURKEYGazi University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ankara, TURKEYSoftware evaluation and selection have begun to be addressed as a topic title along with the fact that microcomputers and then personal computers have become widespread and have been used in the operations of businesses. In this study, it was focused on the selection of software for identifying the physical effect distances of the explosion, fire, and toxic emission, which is an important need for industrial institutions containing, using or storing hazardous chemicals. The evaluation and selection of software for the Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) of potential accidents was studied at first. In means of methodology, questionnaires consisting of original questions were applied to the experts. The results obtained from questionnaires according to the Likert scale, were converted into Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) suggestion matrices. In this way, the inconsistency problem in the pairwise comparison matrices was eliminated. As a result, evaluation and selection were made among the HACM software.http://www.ijcce.ac.ir/article_34118_c1546ba067056320b084d215df0414fe.pdfanalytic hierarchy processgroup decision makinghazard analysis and consequence modeling softwarelikert scalesoftware selection |
spellingShingle | Saliha Çetinyokuş Emre Çalışkan Erdem Aksakal Tahsin Çetinyokuş Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering analytic hierarchy process group decision making hazard analysis and consequence modeling software likert scale software selection |
title | Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP |
title_full | Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP |
title_fullStr | Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP |
title_full_unstemmed | Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP |
title_short | Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP |
title_sort | group decision making for hazard analysis and consequence modelling software selection with ahp |
topic | analytic hierarchy process group decision making hazard analysis and consequence modeling software likert scale software selection |
url | http://www.ijcce.ac.ir/article_34118_c1546ba067056320b084d215df0414fe.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salihacetinyokus groupdecisionmakingforhazardanalysisandconsequencemodellingsoftwareselectionwithahp AT emrecalıskan groupdecisionmakingforhazardanalysisandconsequencemodellingsoftwareselectionwithahp AT erdemaksakal groupdecisionmakingforhazardanalysisandconsequencemodellingsoftwareselectionwithahp AT tahsincetinyokus groupdecisionmakingforhazardanalysisandconsequencemodellingsoftwareselectionwithahp |