Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types

Abstract Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR mutation types are associated with efficacy of EGFR TKIs. We investigated the clinical outcomes of afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sojung Park, Sung Yong Lee, Dojin Kim, Yun Su Sim, Jeong-Seon Ryu, Juwhan Choi, Su Hwan Lee, Yon Ju Ryu, Jin Hwa Lee, Jung Hyun Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07765-6
_version_ 1818607085094436864
author Sojung Park
Sung Yong Lee
Dojin Kim
Yun Su Sim
Jeong-Seon Ryu
Juwhan Choi
Su Hwan Lee
Yon Ju Ryu
Jin Hwa Lee
Jung Hyun Chang
author_facet Sojung Park
Sung Yong Lee
Dojin Kim
Yun Su Sim
Jeong-Seon Ryu
Juwhan Choi
Su Hwan Lee
Yon Ju Ryu
Jin Hwa Lee
Jung Hyun Chang
author_sort Sojung Park
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR mutation types are associated with efficacy of EGFR TKIs. We investigated the clinical outcomes of afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib according to EGFR mutation type in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Between May 2010 and December 2018, we investigated 363 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations who received EGFR TKIs. Efficacies of EGFR TKIs such as response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated according to exon 19 deletion (E19del), L858R point mutation (L858R) and uncommon mutations. Results The frequency of E19del was 48.2%, that of L858R was 42.4%, and that of uncommon mutations was 9.4%. E19del and L858R were associated with superior PFS and OS compared with uncommon mutations. Erlotinib showed significantly inferior OS than other TKIs (30.8 ± 3.3 in erlotinib vs. 39.1 ± 4.3 in afatinib vs. 48.4 ± 6.3 in gefitinib; p = 0.031) in patients with L858R. Gefitinib showed significantly inferior PFS (4.6 ± 1.1 in gefitinib vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 in afatinib vs. 10.6 ± 2.7 in erlotinib; p = 0.049) in patients with uncommon mutations. Conclusion Afatinib was significantly associated with a longer PFS, presenting constant effectiveness in all EGFR mutation types. Caution may be needed on the use of erlotinib for L858R and the use of gefitinib for uncommon EGFR mutations.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:21:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23dd74a033ae4c50bd6b27ecab10c314
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:21:08Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-23dd74a033ae4c50bd6b27ecab10c3142022-12-21T22:28:30ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072021-01-012111910.1186/s12885-020-07765-6Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation typesSojung Park0Sung Yong Lee1Dojin Kim2Yun Su Sim3Jeong-Seon Ryu4Juwhan Choi5Su Hwan Lee6Yon Ju Ryu7Jin Hwa Lee8Jung Hyun Chang9Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans UniversityDivision of Respiratory, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro HospitalDivision of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon HospitalDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart HospitalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of MedicineDivision of Respiratory, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro HospitalDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans UniversityDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans UniversityDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans UniversityDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans UniversityAbstract Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR mutation types are associated with efficacy of EGFR TKIs. We investigated the clinical outcomes of afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib according to EGFR mutation type in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Between May 2010 and December 2018, we investigated 363 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations who received EGFR TKIs. Efficacies of EGFR TKIs such as response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated according to exon 19 deletion (E19del), L858R point mutation (L858R) and uncommon mutations. Results The frequency of E19del was 48.2%, that of L858R was 42.4%, and that of uncommon mutations was 9.4%. E19del and L858R were associated with superior PFS and OS compared with uncommon mutations. Erlotinib showed significantly inferior OS than other TKIs (30.8 ± 3.3 in erlotinib vs. 39.1 ± 4.3 in afatinib vs. 48.4 ± 6.3 in gefitinib; p = 0.031) in patients with L858R. Gefitinib showed significantly inferior PFS (4.6 ± 1.1 in gefitinib vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 in afatinib vs. 10.6 ± 2.7 in erlotinib; p = 0.049) in patients with uncommon mutations. Conclusion Afatinib was significantly associated with a longer PFS, presenting constant effectiveness in all EGFR mutation types. Caution may be needed on the use of erlotinib for L858R and the use of gefitinib for uncommon EGFR mutations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07765-6Epidermal growth factor receptorNon-small cell lung cancerAdenocarcinomaSurvivalTyrosine kinase inhibitor
spellingShingle Sojung Park
Sung Yong Lee
Dojin Kim
Yun Su Sim
Jeong-Seon Ryu
Juwhan Choi
Su Hwan Lee
Yon Ju Ryu
Jin Hwa Lee
Jung Hyun Chang
Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
BMC Cancer
Epidermal growth factor receptor
Non-small cell lung cancer
Adenocarcinoma
Survival
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
title Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
title_full Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
title_fullStr Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
title_short Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
title_sort comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring different epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types
topic Epidermal growth factor receptor
Non-small cell lung cancer
Adenocarcinoma
Survival
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07765-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sojungpark comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT sungyonglee comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT dojinkim comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT yunsusim comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT jeongseonryu comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT juwhanchoi comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT suhwanlee comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT yonjuryu comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT jinhwalee comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes
AT junghyunchang comparisonofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinaseinhibitorsforpatientswithlungadenocarcinomaharboringdifferentepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationtypes