The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors

Smithsonite, dolomite, and calcite are carbonate minerals. The crystal structures and spatial distribution characteristics of their common surface metal sites are similar, leading to difficulty in the flotation separation of smithsonite from these carbonate gangues. In this paper, the floatability o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiangxiang Chen, Junzhi Bai, Zhaoyang Zhang, Wen Qiang, Shiyi Huang, Yunfei Ouyang, Tianhao Liu, Wanzhong Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Minerals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/12/1527
_version_ 1797379967215992832
author Xiangxiang Chen
Junzhi Bai
Zhaoyang Zhang
Wen Qiang
Shiyi Huang
Yunfei Ouyang
Tianhao Liu
Wanzhong Yin
author_facet Xiangxiang Chen
Junzhi Bai
Zhaoyang Zhang
Wen Qiang
Shiyi Huang
Yunfei Ouyang
Tianhao Liu
Wanzhong Yin
author_sort Xiangxiang Chen
collection DOAJ
description Smithsonite, dolomite, and calcite are carbonate minerals. The crystal structures and spatial distribution characteristics of their common surface metal sites are similar, leading to difficulty in the flotation separation of smithsonite from these carbonate gangues. In this paper, the floatability of smithsonite, dolomite, and calcite in sodium oleate, salicylhydroxamic acid, and their combined-collector system were systematically studied through single-mineral flotation tests, respectively. The results showed that it was difficult to obtain a noticeable recovery difference between smithsonite–calcite and smithsonite–dolomite in a single-collector system of sodium oleate and salicylhydroxamic acid, both at the same time. In the combined-collector system of salicylhydroxamic acid and sodium oleate with total dosage of 6 × 10<sup>−4</sup> mol/L, molar ratio of 3:1, and pH of 8.0, the recovery difference of smithsonite–calcite and smithsonite–dolomite could reach the highest values of 38.46% and 37.98%, respectively, while obtaining the highest smithsonite recovery of 88.19%. The adsorption mechanism of the combined collectors was investigated via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, a collector adsorption test, and zeta potential measurements, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:30:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23e27a52674a4ad1895d2649ded047a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-163X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:30:40Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Minerals
spelling doaj.art-23e27a52674a4ad1895d2649ded047a82023-12-22T14:26:40ZengMDPI AGMinerals2075-163X2023-12-011312152710.3390/min13121527The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined CollectorsXiangxiang Chen0Junzhi Bai1Zhaoyang Zhang2Wen Qiang3Shiyi Huang4Yunfei Ouyang5Tianhao Liu6Wanzhong Yin7Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaZijin Mining Group Co., Ltd., Longyan 364200, ChinaZijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaZijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaZijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaZijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaZijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaZijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaSmithsonite, dolomite, and calcite are carbonate minerals. The crystal structures and spatial distribution characteristics of their common surface metal sites are similar, leading to difficulty in the flotation separation of smithsonite from these carbonate gangues. In this paper, the floatability of smithsonite, dolomite, and calcite in sodium oleate, salicylhydroxamic acid, and their combined-collector system were systematically studied through single-mineral flotation tests, respectively. The results showed that it was difficult to obtain a noticeable recovery difference between smithsonite–calcite and smithsonite–dolomite in a single-collector system of sodium oleate and salicylhydroxamic acid, both at the same time. In the combined-collector system of salicylhydroxamic acid and sodium oleate with total dosage of 6 × 10<sup>−4</sup> mol/L, molar ratio of 3:1, and pH of 8.0, the recovery difference of smithsonite–calcite and smithsonite–dolomite could reach the highest values of 38.46% and 37.98%, respectively, while obtaining the highest smithsonite recovery of 88.19%. The adsorption mechanism of the combined collectors was investigated via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, a collector adsorption test, and zeta potential measurements, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/12/1527smithsonitecalcitedolomiteflotationcombined collectors
spellingShingle Xiangxiang Chen
Junzhi Bai
Zhaoyang Zhang
Wen Qiang
Shiyi Huang
Yunfei Ouyang
Tianhao Liu
Wanzhong Yin
The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors
Minerals
smithsonite
calcite
dolomite
flotation
combined collectors
title The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors
title_full The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors
title_fullStr The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors
title_full_unstemmed The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors
title_short The Flotation Separation Mechanism of Smithsonite from Calcite and Dolomite with Combined Collectors
title_sort flotation separation mechanism of smithsonite from calcite and dolomite with combined collectors
topic smithsonite
calcite
dolomite
flotation
combined collectors
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/12/1527
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangxiangchen theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT junzhibai theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT zhaoyangzhang theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT wenqiang theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT shiyihuang theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT yunfeiouyang theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT tianhaoliu theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT wanzhongyin theflotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT xiangxiangchen flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT junzhibai flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT zhaoyangzhang flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT wenqiang flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT shiyihuang flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT yunfeiouyang flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT tianhaoliu flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors
AT wanzhongyin flotationseparationmechanismofsmithsonitefromcalciteanddolomitewithcombinedcollectors