Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law

Although the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marko Novak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law 2021-06-01
Series:Bratislava Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/187
_version_ 1818787269443584000
author Marko Novak
author_facet Marko Novak
author_sort Marko Novak
collection DOAJ
description Although the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). They complement the logical mode in unclear legal cases, those with vague and ambiguous premises (both legal and factual). What is discussed here is visual argumentation as part of the visceral mode. Visual arguments can be appropriate in legal argumentation as evidence used to determine the lower premise. However, “thick” visuals invite alternate arguments to be applied in legal argumentation. This “invitation” is not exactly the same as with “thick” verbal texts because what is at issue are different semiotic resources.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T14:05:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23e38541c6bd45a996d683321e84fa23
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2585-7088
2644-6359
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T14:05:05Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law
record_format Article
series Bratislava Law Review
spelling doaj.art-23e38541c6bd45a996d683321e84fa232022-12-21T21:05:15ZengComenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of LawBratislava Law Review2585-70882644-63592021-06-015110.46282/blr.2021.5.1.187Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in LawMarko Novak0New University, European Faculty of LawAlthough the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). They complement the logical mode in unclear legal cases, those with vague and ambiguous premises (both legal and factual). What is discussed here is visual argumentation as part of the visceral mode. Visual arguments can be appropriate in legal argumentation as evidence used to determine the lower premise. However, “thick” visuals invite alternate arguments to be applied in legal argumentation. This “invitation” is not exactly the same as with “thick” verbal texts because what is at issue are different semiotic resources.https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/187visual argumentationmulti-modal argumentationrhetorical argumentationlegal argumentation
spellingShingle Marko Novak
Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
Bratislava Law Review
visual argumentation
multi-modal argumentation
rhetorical argumentation
legal argumentation
title Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
title_full Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
title_fullStr Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
title_full_unstemmed Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
title_short Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
title_sort visual as multi modal argumentation in law
topic visual argumentation
multi-modal argumentation
rhetorical argumentation
legal argumentation
url https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/187
work_keys_str_mv AT markonovak visualasmultimodalargumentationinlaw