Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
Although the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). The...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Bratislava Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/187 |
_version_ | 1818787269443584000 |
---|---|
author | Marko Novak |
author_facet | Marko Novak |
author_sort | Marko Novak |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Although the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). They complement the logical mode in unclear legal cases, those with vague and ambiguous premises (both legal and factual). What is discussed here is visual argumentation as part of the visceral mode. Visual arguments can be appropriate in legal argumentation as evidence used to determine the lower premise. However, “thick” visuals invite alternate arguments to be applied in legal argumentation. This “invitation” is not exactly the same as with “thick” verbal texts because what is at issue are different semiotic resources. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-18T14:05:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-23e38541c6bd45a996d683321e84fa23 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2585-7088 2644-6359 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-18T14:05:05Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law |
record_format | Article |
series | Bratislava Law Review |
spelling | doaj.art-23e38541c6bd45a996d683321e84fa232022-12-21T21:05:15ZengComenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of LawBratislava Law Review2585-70882644-63592021-06-015110.46282/blr.2021.5.1.187Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in LawMarko Novak0New University, European Faculty of LawAlthough the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). They complement the logical mode in unclear legal cases, those with vague and ambiguous premises (both legal and factual). What is discussed here is visual argumentation as part of the visceral mode. Visual arguments can be appropriate in legal argumentation as evidence used to determine the lower premise. However, “thick” visuals invite alternate arguments to be applied in legal argumentation. This “invitation” is not exactly the same as with “thick” verbal texts because what is at issue are different semiotic resources.https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/187visual argumentationmulti-modal argumentationrhetorical argumentationlegal argumentation |
spellingShingle | Marko Novak Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law Bratislava Law Review visual argumentation multi-modal argumentation rhetorical argumentation legal argumentation |
title | Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law |
title_full | Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law |
title_fullStr | Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law |
title_short | Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law |
title_sort | visual as multi modal argumentation in law |
topic | visual argumentation multi-modal argumentation rhetorical argumentation legal argumentation |
url | https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markonovak visualasmultimodalargumentationinlaw |