New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study

CONTEXT: Enteral feeding is indicated for patients unable to maintain appropriate oral intake, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most adequate long-term enteral access. Peristomal infections are the most common complications of PEG, occurring in up to 8% of patients, despite the u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda Prata Martins, Maris Celia Batista de Sousa, Angelo Paulo Ferrari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia (IBEPEGE) 2011-12-01
Series:Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032011000400003&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1817993112162664448
author Fernanda Prata Martins
Maris Celia Batista de Sousa
Angelo Paulo Ferrari
author_facet Fernanda Prata Martins
Maris Celia Batista de Sousa
Angelo Paulo Ferrari
author_sort Fernanda Prata Martins
collection DOAJ
description CONTEXT: Enteral feeding is indicated for patients unable to maintain appropriate oral intake, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most adequate long-term enteral access. Peristomal infections are the most common complications of PEG, occurring in up to 8% of patients, despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics. The "introducer" PEG-gastropexy technique avoids PEG tube passage through the oral cavity, preventing microorganisms' dislodgment to the peristomal site. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of peristomal wound infection at 7-day post-procedure after conventional "pull" technique versus a new "introducer" PEG-gastropexy kit. Secondary outcomes included success rates, procedure time, and other complications. METHODS: Eighteen patients referred for PEG placement between June and December 2010 were randomly assigned to "pull" PEG with antibiotics or "introducer" PEG-gastropexy technique without antibiotics. RESULTS: Overall success rate for both methods was 100%, although mean procedure duration was higher in the "introducer" PEG-gastropexy group (12.6 versus 6.4 minutes, P = 0.0166). Infection scores were slightly higher in patients who underwent "pull" PEG with antibiotics compared with "introducer" PEG-gastropexy without antibiotics (1.33 ± 0.83 versus 0.75 ± 0.67, P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Although procedure duration was longer in the "introducer" PEG-gastropexy, infection scores were marginally higher in the "pull" PEG technique.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:35:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23eaea59ba874374bd8499ea898c4eb0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-4219
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:35:25Z
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia (IBEPEGE)
record_format Article
series Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
spelling doaj.art-23eaea59ba874374bd8499ea898c4eb02022-12-22T02:19:57ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia (IBEPEGE)Arquivos de Gastroenterologia1678-42192011-12-0148423123510.1590/S0004-28032011000400003S0004-28032011000400003New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot studyFernanda Prata MartinsMaris Celia Batista de SousaAngelo Paulo FerrariCONTEXT: Enteral feeding is indicated for patients unable to maintain appropriate oral intake, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most adequate long-term enteral access. Peristomal infections are the most common complications of PEG, occurring in up to 8% of patients, despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics. The "introducer" PEG-gastropexy technique avoids PEG tube passage through the oral cavity, preventing microorganisms' dislodgment to the peristomal site. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of peristomal wound infection at 7-day post-procedure after conventional "pull" technique versus a new "introducer" PEG-gastropexy kit. Secondary outcomes included success rates, procedure time, and other complications. METHODS: Eighteen patients referred for PEG placement between June and December 2010 were randomly assigned to "pull" PEG with antibiotics or "introducer" PEG-gastropexy technique without antibiotics. RESULTS: Overall success rate for both methods was 100%, although mean procedure duration was higher in the "introducer" PEG-gastropexy group (12.6 versus 6.4 minutes, P = 0.0166). Infection scores were slightly higher in patients who underwent "pull" PEG with antibiotics compared with "introducer" PEG-gastropexy without antibiotics (1.33 ± 0.83 versus 0.75 ± 0.67, P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Although procedure duration was longer in the "introducer" PEG-gastropexy, infection scores were marginally higher in the "pull" PEG technique.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032011000400003&lng=en&tlng=enNutrição enteralGastrostomia, métodosGastrostomia, efeitos adversos
spellingShingle Fernanda Prata Martins
Maris Celia Batista de Sousa
Angelo Paulo Ferrari
New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Nutrição enteral
Gastrostomia, métodos
Gastrostomia, efeitos adversos
title New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study
title_full New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study
title_fullStr New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study
title_short New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study
title_sort new introducer peg gastropexy with t fasteners a pilot study
topic Nutrição enteral
Gastrostomia, métodos
Gastrostomia, efeitos adversos
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032011000400003&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandapratamartins newintroducerpeggastropexywithtfastenersapilotstudy
AT marisceliabatistadesousa newintroducerpeggastropexywithtfastenersapilotstudy
AT angelopauloferrari newintroducerpeggastropexywithtfastenersapilotstudy