Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers
The surface roughness of different glass–ionomer-based materials and their shear bond strength with a resin composite with and without thermal cycling were evaluated. Ketac Molar (KM, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Glass Carbomer (GC, GCP Dental, Leiden, The Netherlands), Bioactive (BA, PULPDENT, Corp...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Functional Biomaterials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/14/7/367 |
| _version_ | 1797588748131631104 |
|---|---|
| author | Handan Yıldırım Işık Aylin Çilingir |
| author_facet | Handan Yıldırım Işık Aylin Çilingir |
| author_sort | Handan Yıldırım Işık |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The surface roughness of different glass–ionomer-based materials and their shear bond strength with a resin composite with and without thermal cycling were evaluated. Ketac Molar (KM, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Glass Carbomer (GC, GCP Dental, Leiden, The Netherlands), Bioactive (BA, PULPDENT, Corporation, Watertown, MA, USA) and Fuji II LC (FJ, GC, Tokyo, Japan) were used to prepare the specimens and they were kept in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured with a profilometer (<i>n</i> = 6). A universal adhesive resin was applied on glass–ionomer materials and cylindrical universal composites were applied and polymerized, respectively (<i>n</i> = 16). The specimens were divided into two subgroups. The first subgroup was subjected to thermal cycling. Shear bond strength was investigated for both subgroups (<i>n</i> = 8). Stereomicroscopy and SEM examinations were performed. The roughest surface was obtained in the GC group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The shear bond strength of the specimens without thermal cycling was higher than that of those with thermal cycling (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The lowest shear bond was measured in the GC group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although FJ, KM and BA have been observed to be suitable materials for clinical use, BA, in particular, is evidenced to become the best option among the materials we tested. GC cement’s long-term performance needs to be improved. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:56:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2400dfd6d1fe4e7eaa816c5ebe19c6af |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2079-4983 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:56:25Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Functional Biomaterials |
| spelling | doaj.art-2400dfd6d1fe4e7eaa816c5ebe19c6af2023-11-18T19:56:28ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Biomaterials2079-49832023-07-0114736710.3390/jfb14070367Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass IonomersHandan Yıldırım Işık0Aylin Çilingir1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Beykent University, 34500 İstanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Trakya University, Balkan Campus, 22030 Edirne, TurkeyThe surface roughness of different glass–ionomer-based materials and their shear bond strength with a resin composite with and without thermal cycling were evaluated. Ketac Molar (KM, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Glass Carbomer (GC, GCP Dental, Leiden, The Netherlands), Bioactive (BA, PULPDENT, Corporation, Watertown, MA, USA) and Fuji II LC (FJ, GC, Tokyo, Japan) were used to prepare the specimens and they were kept in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured with a profilometer (<i>n</i> = 6). A universal adhesive resin was applied on glass–ionomer materials and cylindrical universal composites were applied and polymerized, respectively (<i>n</i> = 16). The specimens were divided into two subgroups. The first subgroup was subjected to thermal cycling. Shear bond strength was investigated for both subgroups (<i>n</i> = 8). Stereomicroscopy and SEM examinations were performed. The roughest surface was obtained in the GC group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The shear bond strength of the specimens without thermal cycling was higher than that of those with thermal cycling (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The lowest shear bond was measured in the GC group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although FJ, KM and BA have been observed to be suitable materials for clinical use, BA, in particular, is evidenced to become the best option among the materials we tested. GC cement’s long-term performance needs to be improved.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/14/7/367glass–ionomer cementshear bond strengthsurface roughnessthermal cycling |
| spellingShingle | Handan Yıldırım Işık Aylin Çilingir Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers Journal of Functional Biomaterials glass–ionomer cement shear bond strength surface roughness thermal cycling |
| title | Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers |
| title_full | Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers |
| title_fullStr | Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers |
| title_short | Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers |
| title_sort | adhesion and surface roughness of apatite containing carbomer and improved ionically bioactive resin compared to glass ionomers |
| topic | glass–ionomer cement shear bond strength surface roughness thermal cycling |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/14/7/367 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT handanyıldırımisık adhesionandsurfaceroughnessofapatitecontainingcarbomerandimprovedionicallybioactiveresincomparedtoglassionomers AT aylincilingir adhesionandsurfaceroughnessofapatitecontainingcarbomerandimprovedionicallybioactiveresincomparedtoglassionomers |