First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of abortion facilities from professional networks in the United States (US, n = 703) and Canada (n = 94) to estimate the prevalence of medication abortion practices in these settings and to look at regional differences. Administrators responded to questions on g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heidi E Jones, Katharine O'Connell White, Wendy V Norman, Edith Guilbert, E Steve Lichtenberg, Maureen Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638562?pdf=render
_version_ 1818924721324949504
author Heidi E Jones
Katharine O'Connell White
Wendy V Norman
Edith Guilbert
E Steve Lichtenberg
Maureen Paul
author_facet Heidi E Jones
Katharine O'Connell White
Wendy V Norman
Edith Guilbert
E Steve Lichtenberg
Maureen Paul
author_sort Heidi E Jones
collection DOAJ
description We conducted a cross-sectional survey of abortion facilities from professional networks in the United States (US, n = 703) and Canada (n = 94) to estimate the prevalence of medication abortion practices in these settings and to look at regional differences. Administrators responded to questions on gestational limits, while up to five clinicians per facility reported on 2012 medication abortion practice. At the time of fielding, mifepristone was not approved in Canada. 383 (54.5%) US and 78 (83.0%) Canadian facilities participated. In the US, 95.3% offered first trimester medication abortion compared to 25.6% in Canada. While 100% of providers were physicians in Canada, just under half (49.4%) were advanced practice clinicians in the US, which was more common in Eastern and Western states. All Canadian providers used misoprostol; 85.3% with methotrexate. 91.4% of US providers used 200 mg of mifepristone and 800 mcg of misoprostol, with 96.7% reporting home misoprostol administration. More than three-quarters of providers in both countries required an in-person follow-up visit, generally with ultrasound. 87.7% of US providers routinely prescribed antibiotics compared to 26.2% in Canada. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly reported analgesic, with regional variation in opioid narcotic prescription. In conclusion, medication abortion practice follows evidence-based guidelines in the US and Canada. Efforts to update practice based on the latest evidence for reducing in-person visits and increasing provision by advanced practice clinicians could strengthen these services and reduce barriers to access. Research is needed on optimal antibiotic and analgesic use.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:29:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2401f384809640e69c8ccb20bf9efa3a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:29:50Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2401f384809640e69c8ccb20bf9efa3a2022-12-21T19:56:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011210e018648710.1371/journal.pone.0186487First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.Heidi E JonesKatharine O'Connell WhiteWendy V NormanEdith GuilbertE Steve LichtenbergMaureen PaulWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of abortion facilities from professional networks in the United States (US, n = 703) and Canada (n = 94) to estimate the prevalence of medication abortion practices in these settings and to look at regional differences. Administrators responded to questions on gestational limits, while up to five clinicians per facility reported on 2012 medication abortion practice. At the time of fielding, mifepristone was not approved in Canada. 383 (54.5%) US and 78 (83.0%) Canadian facilities participated. In the US, 95.3% offered first trimester medication abortion compared to 25.6% in Canada. While 100% of providers were physicians in Canada, just under half (49.4%) were advanced practice clinicians in the US, which was more common in Eastern and Western states. All Canadian providers used misoprostol; 85.3% with methotrexate. 91.4% of US providers used 200 mg of mifepristone and 800 mcg of misoprostol, with 96.7% reporting home misoprostol administration. More than three-quarters of providers in both countries required an in-person follow-up visit, generally with ultrasound. 87.7% of US providers routinely prescribed antibiotics compared to 26.2% in Canada. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly reported analgesic, with regional variation in opioid narcotic prescription. In conclusion, medication abortion practice follows evidence-based guidelines in the US and Canada. Efforts to update practice based on the latest evidence for reducing in-person visits and increasing provision by advanced practice clinicians could strengthen these services and reduce barriers to access. Research is needed on optimal antibiotic and analgesic use.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638562?pdf=render
spellingShingle Heidi E Jones
Katharine O'Connell White
Wendy V Norman
Edith Guilbert
E Steve Lichtenberg
Maureen Paul
First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
PLoS ONE
title First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
title_full First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
title_fullStr First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
title_full_unstemmed First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
title_short First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
title_sort first trimester medication abortion practice in the united states and canada
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638562?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT heidiejones firsttrimestermedicationabortionpracticeintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT katharineoconnellwhite firsttrimestermedicationabortionpracticeintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT wendyvnorman firsttrimestermedicationabortionpracticeintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT edithguilbert firsttrimestermedicationabortionpracticeintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT estevelichtenberg firsttrimestermedicationabortionpracticeintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT maureenpaul firsttrimestermedicationabortionpracticeintheunitedstatesandcanada