Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality

The article employs comparative analysis to investigate the nexus between constitutional adjudication and electoral systems through the perspective of the principle of equality in elections. It delves into the different reasoning of the constitutional courts of Germany, Italy and Spain, trying to un...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrea Romano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2023-10-01
Series:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/89827
_version_ 1797296718952267776
author Andrea Romano
author_facet Andrea Romano
author_sort Andrea Romano
collection DOAJ
description The article employs comparative analysis to investigate the nexus between constitutional adjudication and electoral systems through the perspective of the principle of equality in elections. It delves into the different reasoning of the constitutional courts of Germany, Italy and Spain, trying to unpack the various interpretations attached to that principle under the case law of these courts. In particular, it explores the arguments revolving around the interpretation of equality as the “one person, one vote” rule and its potential wider meaning, comparing the approaches adopted in the case law of the three jurisdictions. On a theoretical level, this submission aims to provide insights on the functions and limits of constitutional review in electoral matters and, more generally, to contribute to studies of constitutional law concerned with the tension between legislative discretion and the role of constitutional courts.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:08:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-240480f0131d43edb4099a46708aa454
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2359-5639
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:08:51Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
record_format Article
series Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
spelling doaj.art-240480f0131d43edb4099a46708aa4542024-02-23T17:52:00ZengUniversidade Federal do ParanáRevista de Investigações Constitucionais2359-56392023-10-01102e232e23210.5380/rinc.v10i2.8982740594Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral EqualityAndrea Romano0University of BarcelonaThe article employs comparative analysis to investigate the nexus between constitutional adjudication and electoral systems through the perspective of the principle of equality in elections. It delves into the different reasoning of the constitutional courts of Germany, Italy and Spain, trying to unpack the various interpretations attached to that principle under the case law of these courts. In particular, it explores the arguments revolving around the interpretation of equality as the “one person, one vote” rule and its potential wider meaning, comparing the approaches adopted in the case law of the three jurisdictions. On a theoretical level, this submission aims to provide insights on the functions and limits of constitutional review in electoral matters and, more generally, to contribute to studies of constitutional law concerned with the tension between legislative discretion and the role of constitutional courts.https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/89827equalityelectoral lawconstitutional jurisdictioncomparative constitutionalism
spellingShingle Andrea Romano
Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
equality
electoral law
constitutional jurisdiction
comparative constitutionalism
title Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_full Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_fullStr Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_short Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_sort constitutional courts dealing with electoral systems a comparative look at constitutional adjudication on electoral equality
topic equality
electoral law
constitutional jurisdiction
comparative constitutionalism
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/89827
work_keys_str_mv AT andrearomano constitutionalcourtsdealingwithelectoralsystemsacomparativelookatconstitutionaladjudicationonelectoralequality