Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning

This special issue focuses on a conflict between emphasizing nuances and complexity in professional work research and a systematic scientific presentation. The article presents the argument that such a conflict can appear in research collaborations dominated by diverse perceptions of validity and o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marie Østergaard Møller
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Aarhus University 2020-03-01
Series:Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/tipro/article/view/119272
_version_ 1827889800287354880
author Marie Østergaard Møller
author_facet Marie Østergaard Møller
author_sort Marie Østergaard Møller
collection DOAJ
description This special issue focuses on a conflict between emphasizing nuances and complexity in professional work research and a systematic scientific presentation. The article presents the argument that such a conflict can appear in research collaborations dominated by diverse perceptions of validity and of what count as valid knowledge and interpretation of a given phenomenon. Based on a presentation of a backward-mapping scientific analysis of professional work, the article discusses pros and cons of integrating professional complexity with scientific criteria for valid and reliable analyses.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:00:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2427658178ca478cbc7aafab46d44caa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2446-0273
2446-0281
language Danish
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:00:46Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Aarhus University
record_format Article
series Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier
spelling doaj.art-2427658178ca478cbc7aafab46d44caa2023-07-31T07:46:45ZdanAarhus UniversityTidsskrift for Professionsstudier2446-02732446-02812020-03-01163010.7146/tfp.v16i30.119272Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskningMarie Østergaard Møller This special issue focuses on a conflict between emphasizing nuances and complexity in professional work research and a systematic scientific presentation. The article presents the argument that such a conflict can appear in research collaborations dominated by diverse perceptions of validity and of what count as valid knowledge and interpretation of a given phenomenon. Based on a presentation of a backward-mapping scientific analysis of professional work, the article discusses pros and cons of integrating professional complexity with scientific criteria for valid and reliable analyses. https://tidsskrift.dk/tipro/article/view/119272Kvalitativ effektanalyseprofessionsforskningvaliditet
spellingShingle Marie Østergaard Møller
Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier
Kvalitativ effektanalyse
professionsforskning
validitet
title Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
title_full Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
title_fullStr Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
title_full_unstemmed Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
title_short Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
title_sort kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
topic Kvalitativ effektanalyse
professionsforskning
validitet
url https://tidsskrift.dk/tipro/article/view/119272
work_keys_str_mv AT marieøstergaardmøller kompleksitetogsystematikiprofessionsforskning