Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning
This special issue focuses on a conflict between emphasizing nuances and complexity in professional work research and a systematic scientific presentation. The article presents the argument that such a conflict can appear in research collaborations dominated by diverse perceptions of validity and o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Aarhus University
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://tidsskrift.dk/tipro/article/view/119272 |
_version_ | 1827889800287354880 |
---|---|
author | Marie Østergaard Møller |
author_facet | Marie Østergaard Møller |
author_sort | Marie Østergaard Møller |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This special issue focuses on a conflict between emphasizing nuances and complexity in professional work research and a systematic scientific presentation. The article presents the argument that such a conflict can appear in research collaborations dominated by diverse perceptions of validity and of what count as valid knowledge and interpretation of a given phenomenon. Based on a presentation of a backward-mapping scientific analysis of professional work, the article discusses pros and cons of integrating professional complexity with scientific criteria for valid and reliable analyses.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:00:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2427658178ca478cbc7aafab46d44caa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2446-0273 2446-0281 |
language | Danish |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:00:46Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | Aarhus University |
record_format | Article |
series | Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier |
spelling | doaj.art-2427658178ca478cbc7aafab46d44caa2023-07-31T07:46:45ZdanAarhus UniversityTidsskrift for Professionsstudier2446-02732446-02812020-03-01163010.7146/tfp.v16i30.119272Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskningMarie Østergaard Møller This special issue focuses on a conflict between emphasizing nuances and complexity in professional work research and a systematic scientific presentation. The article presents the argument that such a conflict can appear in research collaborations dominated by diverse perceptions of validity and of what count as valid knowledge and interpretation of a given phenomenon. Based on a presentation of a backward-mapping scientific analysis of professional work, the article discusses pros and cons of integrating professional complexity with scientific criteria for valid and reliable analyses. https://tidsskrift.dk/tipro/article/view/119272Kvalitativ effektanalyseprofessionsforskningvaliditet |
spellingShingle | Marie Østergaard Møller Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier Kvalitativ effektanalyse professionsforskning validitet |
title | Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning |
title_full | Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning |
title_fullStr | Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning |
title_full_unstemmed | Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning |
title_short | Kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning |
title_sort | kompleksitet og systematik i professionsforskning |
topic | Kvalitativ effektanalyse professionsforskning validitet |
url | https://tidsskrift.dk/tipro/article/view/119272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marieøstergaardmøller kompleksitetogsystematikiprofessionsforskning |