Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
Cylindrical samples of AISI 1020 steel were nitrided, using the techniques of conventional plasma nitriding and cathodic cage. In the latter, the samples are kept at floating potential, inside of a cage that works as a cathode and to shield the samples from the cathodic potential. A systematic study...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol)
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Materials Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mr/v17n3/aop_matres_237213.pdf |
_version_ | 1798026150332596224 |
---|---|
author | Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa Yuri José Luz Moura Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa Clodomiro Alves Junior |
author_facet | Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa Yuri José Luz Moura Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa Clodomiro Alves Junior |
author_sort | Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Cylindrical samples of AISI 1020 steel were nitrided, using the techniques of conventional plasma nitriding and cathodic cage. In the latter, the samples are kept at floating potential, inside of a cage that works as a cathode and to shield the samples from the cathodic potential. A systematic study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficiency of this technique in the elimination of edge effect, in comparison with conventional plasma nitriding. In addition, another comparative study of the phases obtained using the conventional plasma nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage was performed. Two metallic cages were used, one made of austenitic stainless AISI 316 and other one made of AISI 1020 steel, to prove the effect of deposition in nitriding with cathodic cage. The samples which were nitrided by this new technique had shown nitriding rates, crystalline phases, and microhardness, similar to those samples which were nitrided conventionally. However, it was possible to confirm the elimination of edge effect through the characterization by optical microscopy and by microhardness test along the samples surfaces. The samples were characterized by optical microscopy, microhardness tests and X-ray diffraction. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T18:30:39Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-242c15cfee16422c96e1a55f2077d642 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1516-1439 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T18:30:39Z |
publishDate | 2014-03-01 |
publisher | Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol) |
record_format | Article |
series | Materials Research |
spelling | doaj.art-242c15cfee16422c96e1a55f2077d6422022-12-22T04:09:27ZengAssociação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol)Materials Research1516-14392014-03-0117370871310.1590/S1516-14392014005000027Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cageRômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa0Yuri José Luz Moura1Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa2José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto3Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa4Clodomiro Alves Junior5Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do PiauíInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do PiauíInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do PiauíUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteCylindrical samples of AISI 1020 steel were nitrided, using the techniques of conventional plasma nitriding and cathodic cage. In the latter, the samples are kept at floating potential, inside of a cage that works as a cathode and to shield the samples from the cathodic potential. A systematic study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficiency of this technique in the elimination of edge effect, in comparison with conventional plasma nitriding. In addition, another comparative study of the phases obtained using the conventional plasma nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage was performed. Two metallic cages were used, one made of austenitic stainless AISI 316 and other one made of AISI 1020 steel, to prove the effect of deposition in nitriding with cathodic cage. The samples which were nitrided by this new technique had shown nitriding rates, crystalline phases, and microhardness, similar to those samples which were nitrided conventionally. However, it was possible to confirm the elimination of edge effect through the characterization by optical microscopy and by microhardness test along the samples surfaces. The samples were characterized by optical microscopy, microhardness tests and X-ray diffraction.http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mr/v17n3/aop_matres_237213.pdfcathodic cageplasma nitridingSAE 1020 steel |
spellingShingle | Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa Yuri José Luz Moura Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa Clodomiro Alves Junior Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage Materials Research cathodic cage plasma nitriding SAE 1020 steel |
title | Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage |
title_full | Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage |
title_fullStr | Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage |
title_full_unstemmed | Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage |
title_short | Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage |
title_sort | nitriding of aisi 1020 steel comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage |
topic | cathodic cage plasma nitriding SAE 1020 steel |
url | http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mr/v17n3/aop_matres_237213.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romuloribeiromagalhaesdesousa nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage AT yurijoseluzmoura nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage AT pedroamericoorsanodesousa nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage AT josequinzinhomedeirosneto nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage AT therciohenriquedecarvalhocosta nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage AT clodomiroalvesjunior nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage |