Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage

Cylindrical samples of AISI 1020 steel were nitrided, using the techniques of conventional plasma nitriding and cathodic cage. In the latter, the samples are kept at floating potential, inside of a cage that works as a cathode and to shield the samples from the cathodic potential. A systematic study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa, Yuri José Luz Moura, Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa, José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto, Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa, Clodomiro Alves Junior
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol) 2014-03-01
Series:Materials Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mr/v17n3/aop_matres_237213.pdf
_version_ 1798026150332596224
author Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa
Yuri José Luz Moura
Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa
José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto
Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa
Clodomiro Alves Junior
author_facet Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa
Yuri José Luz Moura
Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa
José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto
Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa
Clodomiro Alves Junior
author_sort Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa
collection DOAJ
description Cylindrical samples of AISI 1020 steel were nitrided, using the techniques of conventional plasma nitriding and cathodic cage. In the latter, the samples are kept at floating potential, inside of a cage that works as a cathode and to shield the samples from the cathodic potential. A systematic study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficiency of this technique in the elimination of edge effect, in comparison with conventional plasma nitriding. In addition, another comparative study of the phases obtained using the conventional plasma nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage was performed. Two metallic cages were used, one made of austenitic stainless AISI 316 and other one made of AISI 1020 steel, to prove the effect of deposition in nitriding with cathodic cage. The samples which were nitrided by this new technique had shown nitriding rates, crystalline phases, and microhardness, similar to those samples which were nitrided conventionally. However, it was possible to confirm the elimination of edge effect through the characterization by optical microscopy and by microhardness test along the samples surfaces. The samples were characterized by optical microscopy, microhardness tests and X-ray diffraction.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:30:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-242c15cfee16422c96e1a55f2077d642
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1516-1439
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:30:39Z
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol)
record_format Article
series Materials Research
spelling doaj.art-242c15cfee16422c96e1a55f2077d6422022-12-22T04:09:27ZengAssociação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol)Materials Research1516-14392014-03-0117370871310.1590/S1516-14392014005000027Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cageRômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa0Yuri José Luz Moura1Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa2José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto3Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa4Clodomiro Alves Junior5Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do PiauíInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do PiauíInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do PiauíUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteCylindrical samples of AISI 1020 steel were nitrided, using the techniques of conventional plasma nitriding and cathodic cage. In the latter, the samples are kept at floating potential, inside of a cage that works as a cathode and to shield the samples from the cathodic potential. A systematic study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficiency of this technique in the elimination of edge effect, in comparison with conventional plasma nitriding. In addition, another comparative study of the phases obtained using the conventional plasma nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage was performed. Two metallic cages were used, one made of austenitic stainless AISI 316 and other one made of AISI 1020 steel, to prove the effect of deposition in nitriding with cathodic cage. The samples which were nitrided by this new technique had shown nitriding rates, crystalline phases, and microhardness, similar to those samples which were nitrided conventionally. However, it was possible to confirm the elimination of edge effect through the characterization by optical microscopy and by microhardness test along the samples surfaces. The samples were characterized by optical microscopy, microhardness tests and X-ray diffraction.http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mr/v17n3/aop_matres_237213.pdfcathodic cageplasma nitridingSAE 1020 steel
spellingShingle Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães de Sousa
Yuri José Luz Moura
Pedro Américo Orsano de Sousa
José Quinzinho Medeiros Neto
Thércio Henrique de Carvalho Costa
Clodomiro Alves Junior
Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
Materials Research
cathodic cage
plasma nitriding
SAE 1020 steel
title Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
title_full Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
title_fullStr Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
title_full_unstemmed Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
title_short Nitriding of AISI 1020 steel: comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
title_sort nitriding of aisi 1020 steel comparison between conventional nitriding and nitriding with cathodic cage
topic cathodic cage
plasma nitriding
SAE 1020 steel
url http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mr/v17n3/aop_matres_237213.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT romuloribeiromagalhaesdesousa nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage
AT yurijoseluzmoura nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage
AT pedroamericoorsanodesousa nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage
AT josequinzinhomedeirosneto nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage
AT therciohenriquedecarvalhocosta nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage
AT clodomiroalvesjunior nitridingofaisi1020steelcomparisonbetweenconventionalnitridingandnitridingwithcathodiccage