Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2

Background: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is a globally acceptable standardization for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. The American College of Radiology revised the PI-RADS to address the limitations of version 1 in Decem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao-Yan Feng, Liang Wang, Xiang-De Min, Shao-Gang Wang, Guo-Ping Wang, Jie Cai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2016-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=20;spage=2451;epage=2459;aulast=Feng
_version_ 1818421733536825344
author Zhao-Yan Feng
Liang Wang
Xiang-De Min
Shao-Gang Wang
Guo-Ping Wang
Jie Cai
author_facet Zhao-Yan Feng
Liang Wang
Xiang-De Min
Shao-Gang Wang
Guo-Ping Wang
Jie Cai
author_sort Zhao-Yan Feng
collection DOAJ
description Background: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is a globally acceptable standardization for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. The American College of Radiology revised the PI-RADS to address the limitations of version 1 in December 2014. This study aimed to determine whether the PI-RADS version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoring system improves the diagnostic accuracy of mp-MRI of the prostate compared with PI-RADS v1. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 401 consecutive patients, with clinically suspicious PCa undergoing 3.0 T mp-MRI (T2-weighted imaging + diffusion-weighted imaging + DCE) before transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy between June 2013 and July 2015, were included in the study. All patients were scored using the 5-point PI-RADS scoring system based on either PI-RADS v1 or v2. Receiver operating characteristics were calculated for statistical analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were compared using McNemar′s test. Results: PCa was present in 150 of 401 (37.41%) patients. When we pooled data from both peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ), the areas under the curve were 0.889 for PI-RADS v1 and 0.942 for v2 (P = 0.0001). Maximal accuracy was achieved with a score threshold of 4. At this threshold, in the PZ, similar sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were achieved with v1 and v2 (all P > 0.05). In the TZ, sensitivity was higher for v2 than for v1 (96.36% vs. 76.36%, P = 0.003), specificity was similar for v2 and v1 (90.24% vs. 84.15%, P = 0.227), and accuracy was higher for v2 than for v1 (92.70% vs. 81.02%, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Both v1 and v2 showed good diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa. However, in the TZ, the performance was better with v2 than with v1.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T13:15:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-242e22bea3c6440d948091ad336be839
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0366-6999
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T13:15:03Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Chinese Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-242e22bea3c6440d948091ad336be8392022-12-21T23:00:05ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992016-01-01129202451245910.4103/0366-6999.191771Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2Zhao-Yan FengLiang WangXiang-De MinShao-Gang WangGuo-Ping WangJie CaiBackground: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is a globally acceptable standardization for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. The American College of Radiology revised the PI-RADS to address the limitations of version 1 in December 2014. This study aimed to determine whether the PI-RADS version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoring system improves the diagnostic accuracy of mp-MRI of the prostate compared with PI-RADS v1. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 401 consecutive patients, with clinically suspicious PCa undergoing 3.0 T mp-MRI (T2-weighted imaging + diffusion-weighted imaging + DCE) before transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy between June 2013 and July 2015, were included in the study. All patients were scored using the 5-point PI-RADS scoring system based on either PI-RADS v1 or v2. Receiver operating characteristics were calculated for statistical analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were compared using McNemar′s test. Results: PCa was present in 150 of 401 (37.41%) patients. When we pooled data from both peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ), the areas under the curve were 0.889 for PI-RADS v1 and 0.942 for v2 (P = 0.0001). Maximal accuracy was achieved with a score threshold of 4. At this threshold, in the PZ, similar sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were achieved with v1 and v2 (all P > 0.05). In the TZ, sensitivity was higher for v2 than for v1 (96.36% vs. 76.36%, P = 0.003), specificity was similar for v2 and v1 (90.24% vs. 84.15%, P = 0.227), and accuracy was higher for v2 than for v1 (92.70% vs. 81.02%, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Both v1 and v2 showed good diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa. However, in the TZ, the performance was better with v2 than with v1.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=20;spage=2451;epage=2459;aulast=FengMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
spellingShingle Zhao-Yan Feng
Liang Wang
Xiang-De Min
Shao-Gang Wang
Guo-Ping Wang
Jie Cai
Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
Chinese Medical Journal
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
title Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
title_full Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
title_fullStr Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
title_full_unstemmed Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
title_short Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
title_sort prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging prostate imaging reporting and data system version 1 versus version 2
topic Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=20;spage=2451;epage=2459;aulast=Feng
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyanfeng prostatecancerdetectionwithmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion1versusversion2
AT liangwang prostatecancerdetectionwithmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion1versusversion2
AT xiangdemin prostatecancerdetectionwithmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion1versusversion2
AT shaogangwang prostatecancerdetectionwithmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion1versusversion2
AT guopingwang prostatecancerdetectionwithmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion1versusversion2
AT jiecai prostatecancerdetectionwithmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion1versusversion2