Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions

Abstract Introduction This study investigated alternative pre‐analytical handling of blood for neurofilament light (NfL) analysis where resources are limited. Method Plasma NfL was measured with single molecule array after alternative blood processing procedures: dried plasma spots (DPS), dried bloo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joel Simrén, Nicholas J. Ashton, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12145
_version_ 1828085283471491072
author Joel Simrén
Nicholas J. Ashton
Kaj Blennow
Henrik Zetterberg
author_facet Joel Simrén
Nicholas J. Ashton
Kaj Blennow
Henrik Zetterberg
author_sort Joel Simrén
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This study investigated alternative pre‐analytical handling of blood for neurofilament light (NfL) analysis where resources are limited. Method Plasma NfL was measured with single molecule array after alternative blood processing procedures: dried plasma spots (DPS), dried blood spots (DBS), and delayed 48‐hour centrifugation. These were compared to standardized plasma processing (reference standard [RS]). In a discovery cohort (n = 10) and a confirmatory cohort (n = 21), whole blood was obtained from individuals with unknown clinical etiology. In the confirmatory cohort, delayed centrifugation protocol was paired with either 37°C incubation or sample shaking to test the effect of these parameters. Results Delayed centrifugation (R2 = 0.991) and DPS (discovery cohort, R2 = 0.954; confirmatory cohort, DPS: R2 = 0.961) methods were strongly associated with the RS. Delayed centrifugation with higher temperatures (R2 = 0.995) and shaking (R2 = 0.975) did not affect this association. DPS (P < 0.001) returned concentrations considerably lower than the RS. Discussion DPS or delayed centrifugation are viable pre‐analytical procedures for the accurate quantification of plasma NfL.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:36:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2442ba7479ae43c2bf076e60bf77685e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8729
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:36:35Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
spelling doaj.art-2442ba7479ae43c2bf076e60bf77685e2022-12-28T09:12:13ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring2352-87292021-01-01131n/an/a10.1002/dad2.12145Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditionsJoel Simrén0Nicholas J. Ashton1Kaj Blennow2Henrik Zetterberg3Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Mölndal SwedenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Mölndal SwedenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Mölndal SwedenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Mölndal SwedenAbstract Introduction This study investigated alternative pre‐analytical handling of blood for neurofilament light (NfL) analysis where resources are limited. Method Plasma NfL was measured with single molecule array after alternative blood processing procedures: dried plasma spots (DPS), dried blood spots (DBS), and delayed 48‐hour centrifugation. These were compared to standardized plasma processing (reference standard [RS]). In a discovery cohort (n = 10) and a confirmatory cohort (n = 21), whole blood was obtained from individuals with unknown clinical etiology. In the confirmatory cohort, delayed centrifugation protocol was paired with either 37°C incubation or sample shaking to test the effect of these parameters. Results Delayed centrifugation (R2 = 0.991) and DPS (discovery cohort, R2 = 0.954; confirmatory cohort, DPS: R2 = 0.961) methods were strongly associated with the RS. Delayed centrifugation with higher temperatures (R2 = 0.995) and shaking (R2 = 0.975) did not affect this association. DPS (P < 0.001) returned concentrations considerably lower than the RS. Discussion DPS or delayed centrifugation are viable pre‐analytical procedures for the accurate quantification of plasma NfL.https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12145dried blood spotsdried plasma spotsneurofilament lightpre‐analytical handling
spellingShingle Joel Simrén
Nicholas J. Ashton
Kaj Blennow
Henrik Zetterberg
Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
dried blood spots
dried plasma spots
neurofilament light
pre‐analytical handling
title Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions
title_full Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions
title_fullStr Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions
title_full_unstemmed Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions
title_short Blood neurofilament light in remote settings: Alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre‐analytical conditions
title_sort blood neurofilament light in remote settings alternative protocols to support sample collection in challenging pre analytical conditions
topic dried blood spots
dried plasma spots
neurofilament light
pre‐analytical handling
url https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12145
work_keys_str_mv AT joelsimren bloodneurofilamentlightinremotesettingsalternativeprotocolstosupportsamplecollectioninchallengingpreanalyticalconditions
AT nicholasjashton bloodneurofilamentlightinremotesettingsalternativeprotocolstosupportsamplecollectioninchallengingpreanalyticalconditions
AT kajblennow bloodneurofilamentlightinremotesettingsalternativeprotocolstosupportsamplecollectioninchallengingpreanalyticalconditions
AT henrikzetterberg bloodneurofilamentlightinremotesettingsalternativeprotocolstosupportsamplecollectioninchallengingpreanalyticalconditions