Grammatical clues of argumentation

The aim of this work is to track down the syntactic-semantic grammatical phenomena present in textual productions of Basic Education students (Projeto PIBID Português 2/UFPR). The central questions are the following: Which grammatical aspects evidence argumentatively vague texts, without the saying...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denise Mazocco, Teresa Cristina Wachowicz
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística 2018-01-01
Series:Working Papers em Linguística
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/51929
_version_ 1818173433051086848
author Denise Mazocco
Teresa Cristina Wachowicz
author_facet Denise Mazocco
Teresa Cristina Wachowicz
author_sort Denise Mazocco
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this work is to track down the syntactic-semantic grammatical phenomena present in textual productions of Basic Education students (Projeto PIBID Português 2/UFPR). The central questions are the following: Which grammatical aspects evidence argumentatively vague texts, without the saying purpose (POSSENTI, 2012)? And which of them evidence the argumentatively consistent and valid texts? We analyze opinion texts, made by students from the 6th year of Elementary School II to the 3rd year of High School, and we find that what differentiates the texts is a generic or vague (MÜLLER, 2003) semantics and an empty argument structure syntax (RAPOSO, 1992), in detriment of a specific semantics and syntactically controlled argument structures. In this sense, syntactic-semantic constructs, rather than meaning-effect resources, effectively become the grammatical clues of argumentation.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T19:28:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-24714874a36647bcad3480287afafe52
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1415-1464
1984-8420
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-12-11T19:28:25Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística
record_format Article
series Working Papers em Linguística
spelling doaj.art-24714874a36647bcad3480287afafe522022-12-22T00:53:21ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em LinguísticaWorking Papers em Linguística1415-14641984-84202018-01-0118219221010.5007/1984-8420.2017v18n2p19228028Grammatical clues of argumentationDenise Mazocco0Teresa Cristina Wachowicz1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, Universidade Federal do ParanáUniversidade Federal do ParanáThe aim of this work is to track down the syntactic-semantic grammatical phenomena present in textual productions of Basic Education students (Projeto PIBID Português 2/UFPR). The central questions are the following: Which grammatical aspects evidence argumentatively vague texts, without the saying purpose (POSSENTI, 2012)? And which of them evidence the argumentatively consistent and valid texts? We analyze opinion texts, made by students from the 6th year of Elementary School II to the 3rd year of High School, and we find that what differentiates the texts is a generic or vague (MÜLLER, 2003) semantics and an empty argument structure syntax (RAPOSO, 1992), in detriment of a specific semantics and syntactically controlled argument structures. In this sense, syntactic-semantic constructs, rather than meaning-effect resources, effectively become the grammatical clues of argumentation.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/51929ArgumentaçãoSintaxeSemântica
spellingShingle Denise Mazocco
Teresa Cristina Wachowicz
Grammatical clues of argumentation
Working Papers em Linguística
Argumentação
Sintaxe
Semântica
title Grammatical clues of argumentation
title_full Grammatical clues of argumentation
title_fullStr Grammatical clues of argumentation
title_full_unstemmed Grammatical clues of argumentation
title_short Grammatical clues of argumentation
title_sort grammatical clues of argumentation
topic Argumentação
Sintaxe
Semântica
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/51929
work_keys_str_mv AT denisemazocco grammaticalcluesofargumentation
AT teresacristinawachowicz grammaticalcluesofargumentation