The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides. Material and methods: This cross-sect...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ultrasonography |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2021.0007 |
| _version_ | 1818159936429883392 |
|---|---|
| author | Güneşli Aylin Acıbuca Aynur |
| author_facet | Güneşli Aylin Acıbuca Aynur |
| author_sort | Güneşli Aylin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent femoral angiography at least 1 year previously. Those whose femoral artery was accessed once formed Group 1 (n = 59), those who were accessed twice formed Group 2 (n = 57), those accessed 3 times formed Group 3 (n = 55), and those with more than 3 accesses, Group 4 (n = 60). The groups were compared in respect of femoral artery elasticity and distensibility in the accessed and non-accessed sides. Results: No statistically significant difference was determined in respect of femoral distensibility and elasticity in Group 1 (9.40 ± 0.84 vs 9.48 ± 0.75, p = 0.107 and 0.23 ± 0.03 vs 0.23 ± 0.03, p = 0.433, respectively). However, a significant difference was observed between the two sides in terms of distensibility and elasticity in Group 2 (9.02 ± 0.81 vs 9.23 ± 0.75, and 0.21 ± 0.02 vs 0.22 ± 0.02), in Group 3 (8.49 ± 0.77 vs 9.18 ± 0.9 and 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.21 ± 0.02), and in Group 4 (8.14 ± 0.74 vs 9.03 ± 0.81 and 0.16 ± 0.01 vs 0.2 ± 0.02, p <0.001, for all comparisons). Conclusion: While a single access in the femoral artery for coronary angiography does not affect femoral artery elasticity and distensibility, multiple accesses may have adverse effects. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:53:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-247f80ffb5494a6893faae4e9d6d4185 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2451-070X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:53:54Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Ultrasonography |
| spelling | doaj.art-247f80ffb5494a6893faae4e9d6d41852022-12-22T00:59:29ZengSciendoJournal of Ultrasonography2451-070X2021-01-012184485210.15557/jou.2021.0007The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticityGüneşli Aylin0Acıbuca Aynur1Baskent University, School of Medicine, Radiology Department, Adana, TurkeyBaskent University, School of Medicine, Cardiology Department, Adana, TurkeyAim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent femoral angiography at least 1 year previously. Those whose femoral artery was accessed once formed Group 1 (n = 59), those who were accessed twice formed Group 2 (n = 57), those accessed 3 times formed Group 3 (n = 55), and those with more than 3 accesses, Group 4 (n = 60). The groups were compared in respect of femoral artery elasticity and distensibility in the accessed and non-accessed sides. Results: No statistically significant difference was determined in respect of femoral distensibility and elasticity in Group 1 (9.40 ± 0.84 vs 9.48 ± 0.75, p = 0.107 and 0.23 ± 0.03 vs 0.23 ± 0.03, p = 0.433, respectively). However, a significant difference was observed between the two sides in terms of distensibility and elasticity in Group 2 (9.02 ± 0.81 vs 9.23 ± 0.75, and 0.21 ± 0.02 vs 0.22 ± 0.02), in Group 3 (8.49 ± 0.77 vs 9.18 ± 0.9 and 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.21 ± 0.02), and in Group 4 (8.14 ± 0.74 vs 9.03 ± 0.81 and 0.16 ± 0.01 vs 0.2 ± 0.02, p <0.001, for all comparisons). Conclusion: While a single access in the femoral artery for coronary angiography does not affect femoral artery elasticity and distensibility, multiple accesses may have adverse effects.https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2021.0007coronary angiographydoppler ultrasonographyfemoral artery |
| spellingShingle | Güneşli Aylin Acıbuca Aynur The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity Journal of Ultrasonography coronary angiography doppler ultrasonography femoral artery |
| title | The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity |
| title_full | The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity |
| title_fullStr | The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity |
| title_short | The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity |
| title_sort | effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity |
| topic | coronary angiography doppler ultrasonography femoral artery |
| url | https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2021.0007 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gunesliaylin theeffectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity AT acıbucaaynur theeffectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity AT gunesliaylin effectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity AT acıbucaaynur effectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity |