Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection

Background: Distinguishing bacterial and viral respiratory infections is challenging. Novel diagnostics based on differential host gene expression patterns are promising but have not been translated to a clinical platform nor extensively tested. Here, we validate a microarray-derived host response s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily C. Lydon, Ricardo Henao, Thomas W. Burke, Mert Aydin, Bradly P. Nicholson, Seth W. Glickman, Vance G. Fowler, Eugenia B. Quackenbush, Charles B. Cairns, Stephen F. Kingsmore, Anja K. Jaehne, Emanuel P. Rivers, Raymond J. Langley, Elizabeth Petzold, Emily R. Ko, Micah T. McClain, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, Christopher W. Woods, Ephraim L. Tsalik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:EBioMedicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396419306449
_version_ 1818131876551852032
author Emily C. Lydon
Ricardo Henao
Thomas W. Burke
Mert Aydin
Bradly P. Nicholson
Seth W. Glickman
Vance G. Fowler
Eugenia B. Quackenbush
Charles B. Cairns
Stephen F. Kingsmore
Anja K. Jaehne
Emanuel P. Rivers
Raymond J. Langley
Elizabeth Petzold
Emily R. Ko
Micah T. McClain
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
Christopher W. Woods
Ephraim L. Tsalik
author_facet Emily C. Lydon
Ricardo Henao
Thomas W. Burke
Mert Aydin
Bradly P. Nicholson
Seth W. Glickman
Vance G. Fowler
Eugenia B. Quackenbush
Charles B. Cairns
Stephen F. Kingsmore
Anja K. Jaehne
Emanuel P. Rivers
Raymond J. Langley
Elizabeth Petzold
Emily R. Ko
Micah T. McClain
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
Christopher W. Woods
Ephraim L. Tsalik
author_sort Emily C. Lydon
collection DOAJ
description Background: Distinguishing bacterial and viral respiratory infections is challenging. Novel diagnostics based on differential host gene expression patterns are promising but have not been translated to a clinical platform nor extensively tested. Here, we validate a microarray-derived host response signature and explore performance in microbiology-negative and coinfection cases. Methods: Subjects with acute respiratory illness were enrolled in participating emergency departments. Reference standard was an adjudicated diagnosis of bacterial infection, viral infection, both, or neither. An 87-transcript signature for distinguishing bacterial, viral, and noninfectious illness was measured from peripheral blood using RT-PCR. Performance characteristics were evaluated in subjects with confirmed bacterial, viral, or noninfectious illness. Subjects with bacterial-viral coinfection and microbiologically-negative suspected bacterial infection were also evaluated. Performance was compared to procalcitonin. Findings: 151 subjects with microbiologically confirmed, single-etiology illness were tested, yielding AUROCs 0•85–0•89 for bacterial, viral, and noninfectious illness. Accuracy was similar to procalcitonin (88% vs 83%, p = 0•23) for bacterial vs. non-bacterial infection. Whereas procalcitonin cannot distinguish viral from non-infectious illness, the RT-PCR test had 81% accuracy in making this determination. Bacterial-viral coinfection was subdivided. Among 19 subjects with bacterial superinfection, the RT-PCR test identified 95% as bacterial, compared to 68% with procalcitonin (p = 0•13). Among 12 subjects with bacterial infection superimposed on chronic viral infection, the RT-PCR test identified 83% as bacterial, identical to procalcitonin. 39 subjects had suspected bacterial infection; the RT-PCR test identified bacterial infection more frequently than procalcitonin (82% vs 64%, p = 0•02). Interpretation: The RT-PCR test offered similar diagnostic performance to procalcitonin in some subgroups but offered better discrimination in others such as viral vs. non-infectious illness and bacterial/viral coinfection. Gene expression-based tests could impact decision-making for acute respiratory illness as well as a growing number of other infectious and non-infectious diseases. Keywords: Biomarkers, Gene expression, Respiratory tract infections, Coinfection, Diagnosis, Precision medicine
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:27:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-24872e5a3d85489aa45fad625b167655
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-3964
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:27:54Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series EBioMedicine
spelling doaj.art-24872e5a3d85489aa45fad625b1676552022-12-22T01:14:31ZengElsevierEBioMedicine2352-39642019-10-0148453461Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infectionEmily C. Lydon0Ricardo Henao1Thomas W. Burke2Mert Aydin3Bradly P. Nicholson4Seth W. Glickman5Vance G. Fowler6Eugenia B. Quackenbush7Charles B. Cairns8Stephen F. Kingsmore9Anja K. Jaehne10Emanuel P. Rivers11Raymond J. Langley12Elizabeth Petzold13Emily R. Ko14Micah T. McClain15Geoffrey S. Ginsburg16Christopher W. Woods17Ephraim L. Tsalik18Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USADuke University Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Durham, NC, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USAInstitute of Medical Research, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USAUniversity of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USADuke University Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USAUniversity of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USAUniversity of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAERady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA, USAHenry Ford Hospital System, Detroit, MI, USAHenry Ford Hospital System, Detroit, MI, USAUniversity of South Alabama Health University Hospital, Mobile, AL, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Hospital Medicine, Duke Regional Hospital, Durham, NC 27705, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Co-Corresponding author at: 508 Fulton Street, Service 113,Durham, NC 27710, USADuke University Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Corresponding author at: Duke University Medical Center 102359, Durham, NC 27705, USA.Background: Distinguishing bacterial and viral respiratory infections is challenging. Novel diagnostics based on differential host gene expression patterns are promising but have not been translated to a clinical platform nor extensively tested. Here, we validate a microarray-derived host response signature and explore performance in microbiology-negative and coinfection cases. Methods: Subjects with acute respiratory illness were enrolled in participating emergency departments. Reference standard was an adjudicated diagnosis of bacterial infection, viral infection, both, or neither. An 87-transcript signature for distinguishing bacterial, viral, and noninfectious illness was measured from peripheral blood using RT-PCR. Performance characteristics were evaluated in subjects with confirmed bacterial, viral, or noninfectious illness. Subjects with bacterial-viral coinfection and microbiologically-negative suspected bacterial infection were also evaluated. Performance was compared to procalcitonin. Findings: 151 subjects with microbiologically confirmed, single-etiology illness were tested, yielding AUROCs 0•85–0•89 for bacterial, viral, and noninfectious illness. Accuracy was similar to procalcitonin (88% vs 83%, p = 0•23) for bacterial vs. non-bacterial infection. Whereas procalcitonin cannot distinguish viral from non-infectious illness, the RT-PCR test had 81% accuracy in making this determination. Bacterial-viral coinfection was subdivided. Among 19 subjects with bacterial superinfection, the RT-PCR test identified 95% as bacterial, compared to 68% with procalcitonin (p = 0•13). Among 12 subjects with bacterial infection superimposed on chronic viral infection, the RT-PCR test identified 83% as bacterial, identical to procalcitonin. 39 subjects had suspected bacterial infection; the RT-PCR test identified bacterial infection more frequently than procalcitonin (82% vs 64%, p = 0•02). Interpretation: The RT-PCR test offered similar diagnostic performance to procalcitonin in some subgroups but offered better discrimination in others such as viral vs. non-infectious illness and bacterial/viral coinfection. Gene expression-based tests could impact decision-making for acute respiratory illness as well as a growing number of other infectious and non-infectious diseases. Keywords: Biomarkers, Gene expression, Respiratory tract infections, Coinfection, Diagnosis, Precision medicinehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396419306449
spellingShingle Emily C. Lydon
Ricardo Henao
Thomas W. Burke
Mert Aydin
Bradly P. Nicholson
Seth W. Glickman
Vance G. Fowler
Eugenia B. Quackenbush
Charles B. Cairns
Stephen F. Kingsmore
Anja K. Jaehne
Emanuel P. Rivers
Raymond J. Langley
Elizabeth Petzold
Emily R. Ko
Micah T. McClain
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
Christopher W. Woods
Ephraim L. Tsalik
Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
EBioMedicine
title Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
title_full Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
title_fullStr Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
title_short Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
title_sort validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396419306449
work_keys_str_mv AT emilyclydon validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT ricardohenao validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT thomaswburke validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT mertaydin validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT bradlypnicholson validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT sethwglickman validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT vancegfowler validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT eugeniabquackenbush validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT charlesbcairns validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT stephenfkingsmore validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT anjakjaehne validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT emanuelprivers validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT raymondjlangley validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT elizabethpetzold validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT emilyrko validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT micahtmcclain validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT geoffreysginsburg validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT christopherwwoods validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection
AT ephraimltsalik validationofahostresponsetesttodistinguishbacterialandviralrespiratoryinfection