Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping

BackgroundIn the current era of personalized medicine, there is increasing interest in understanding the heterogeneity in disease populations. Cluster analysis is a method commonly used to identify subtypes in heterogeneous disease populations. The clinical data used in such applications are typical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Horne, Elsie, Tibble, Holly, Sheikh, Aziz, Tsanas, Athanasios
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-05-01
Series:JMIR Medical Informatics
Online Access:http://medinform.jmir.org/2020/5/e16452/
_version_ 1818879868880814080
author Horne, Elsie
Tibble, Holly
Sheikh, Aziz
Tsanas, Athanasios
author_facet Horne, Elsie
Tibble, Holly
Sheikh, Aziz
Tsanas, Athanasios
author_sort Horne, Elsie
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIn the current era of personalized medicine, there is increasing interest in understanding the heterogeneity in disease populations. Cluster analysis is a method commonly used to identify subtypes in heterogeneous disease populations. The clinical data used in such applications are typically multimodal, which can make the application of traditional cluster analysis methods challenging. ObjectiveThis study aimed to review the research literature on the application of clustering multimodal clinical data to identify asthma subtypes. We assessed common problems and shortcomings in the application of cluster analysis methods in determining asthma subtypes, such that they can be brought to the attention of the research community and avoided in future studies. MethodsWe searched PubMed and Scopus bibliographic databases with terms related to cluster analysis and asthma to identify studies that applied dissimilarity-based cluster analysis methods. We recorded the analytic methods used in each study at each step of the cluster analysis process. ResultsOur literature search identified 63 studies that applied cluster analysis to multimodal clinical data to identify asthma subtypes. The features fed into the cluster algorithms were of a mixed type in 47 (75%) studies and continuous in 12 (19%), and the feature type was unclear in the remaining 4 (6%) studies. A total of 23 (37%) studies used hierarchical clustering with Ward linkage, and 22 (35%) studies used k-means clustering. Of these 45 studies, 39 had mixed-type features, but only 5 specified dissimilarity measures that could handle mixed-type features. A further 9 (14%) studies used a preclustering step to create small clusters to feed on a hierarchical method. The original sample sizes in these 9 studies ranged from 84 to 349. The remaining studies used hierarchical clustering with other linkages (n=3), medoid-based methods (n=3), spectral clustering (n=1), and multiple kernel k-means clustering (n=1), and in 1 study, the methods were unclear. Of 63 studies, 54 (86%) explained the methods used to determine the number of clusters, 24 (38%) studies tested the quality of their cluster solution, and 11 (17%) studies tested the stability of their solution. Reporting of the cluster analysis was generally poor in terms of the methods employed and their justification. ConclusionsThis review highlights common issues in the application of cluster analysis to multimodal clinical data to identify asthma subtypes. Some of these issues were related to the multimodal nature of the data, but many were more general issues in the application of cluster analysis. Although cluster analysis may be a useful tool for investigating disease subtypes, we recommend that future studies carefully consider the implications of clustering multimodal data, the cluster analysis process itself, and the reporting of methods to facilitate replication and interpretation of findings.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T14:36:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-249b419eaa784af2ac41bfbb21896ddd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2291-9694
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T14:36:55Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Medical Informatics
spelling doaj.art-249b419eaa784af2ac41bfbb21896ddd2022-12-21T20:17:14ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Medical Informatics2291-96942020-05-0185e1645210.2196/16452Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma SubtypingHorne, ElsieTibble, HollySheikh, AzizTsanas, AthanasiosBackgroundIn the current era of personalized medicine, there is increasing interest in understanding the heterogeneity in disease populations. Cluster analysis is a method commonly used to identify subtypes in heterogeneous disease populations. The clinical data used in such applications are typically multimodal, which can make the application of traditional cluster analysis methods challenging. ObjectiveThis study aimed to review the research literature on the application of clustering multimodal clinical data to identify asthma subtypes. We assessed common problems and shortcomings in the application of cluster analysis methods in determining asthma subtypes, such that they can be brought to the attention of the research community and avoided in future studies. MethodsWe searched PubMed and Scopus bibliographic databases with terms related to cluster analysis and asthma to identify studies that applied dissimilarity-based cluster analysis methods. We recorded the analytic methods used in each study at each step of the cluster analysis process. ResultsOur literature search identified 63 studies that applied cluster analysis to multimodal clinical data to identify asthma subtypes. The features fed into the cluster algorithms were of a mixed type in 47 (75%) studies and continuous in 12 (19%), and the feature type was unclear in the remaining 4 (6%) studies. A total of 23 (37%) studies used hierarchical clustering with Ward linkage, and 22 (35%) studies used k-means clustering. Of these 45 studies, 39 had mixed-type features, but only 5 specified dissimilarity measures that could handle mixed-type features. A further 9 (14%) studies used a preclustering step to create small clusters to feed on a hierarchical method. The original sample sizes in these 9 studies ranged from 84 to 349. The remaining studies used hierarchical clustering with other linkages (n=3), medoid-based methods (n=3), spectral clustering (n=1), and multiple kernel k-means clustering (n=1), and in 1 study, the methods were unclear. Of 63 studies, 54 (86%) explained the methods used to determine the number of clusters, 24 (38%) studies tested the quality of their cluster solution, and 11 (17%) studies tested the stability of their solution. Reporting of the cluster analysis was generally poor in terms of the methods employed and their justification. ConclusionsThis review highlights common issues in the application of cluster analysis to multimodal clinical data to identify asthma subtypes. Some of these issues were related to the multimodal nature of the data, but many were more general issues in the application of cluster analysis. Although cluster analysis may be a useful tool for investigating disease subtypes, we recommend that future studies carefully consider the implications of clustering multimodal data, the cluster analysis process itself, and the reporting of methods to facilitate replication and interpretation of findings.http://medinform.jmir.org/2020/5/e16452/
spellingShingle Horne, Elsie
Tibble, Holly
Sheikh, Aziz
Tsanas, Athanasios
Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping
JMIR Medical Informatics
title Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping
title_full Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping
title_fullStr Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping
title_full_unstemmed Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping
title_short Challenges of Clustering Multimodal Clinical Data: Review of Applications in Asthma Subtyping
title_sort challenges of clustering multimodal clinical data review of applications in asthma subtyping
url http://medinform.jmir.org/2020/5/e16452/
work_keys_str_mv AT horneelsie challengesofclusteringmultimodalclinicaldatareviewofapplicationsinasthmasubtyping
AT tibbleholly challengesofclusteringmultimodalclinicaldatareviewofapplicationsinasthmasubtyping
AT sheikhaziz challengesofclusteringmultimodalclinicaldatareviewofapplicationsinasthmasubtyping
AT tsanasathanasios challengesofclusteringmultimodalclinicaldatareviewofapplicationsinasthmasubtyping