Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)

Set designers’ drawings have a similar instrumental character to painters’ drawings, but unlike painters’ drawings, set designers’ drawings refer to works that are not exhibited in museums, are not studied by art historians and, for the most part, are not preserved. These circumstances explain th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muñoz, Tomás
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari 2023-12-01
Series:MDCCC 1800
Subjects:
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.30687/MDCCC/2280-8841/2023/01/006
_version_ 1797404960514637824
author Muñoz, Tomás
author_facet Muñoz, Tomás
author_sort Muñoz, Tomás
collection DOAJ
description Set designers’ drawings have a similar instrumental character to painters’ drawings, but unlike painters’ drawings, set designers’ drawings refer to works that are not exhibited in museums, are not studied by art historians and, for the most part, are not preserved. These circumstances explain the usual reluctance to approach set designers’ drawings. However, these drawings have similar characteristics to those of contemporary painters and can give a very accurate picture of the spirit of an era. This is the case with the drawings of Charles Ciceri (1782‑1868), chief decorator at the Paris Opera and the most important set designer of the first half of the 19th century. His drawings, of unquestionable mastery, represent a wide repertoire of sets imbued with a romantic spirit: ancient ruins, medieval fantasies, orientalist evocations, picturesque natures, etc. The typology of the drawings is also varied: sketches from life, sketches and drawings as inventions for final works (decorations, in the case of Ciceri) and drawings with an autonomous value. The variety of techniques and typologies of Ciceri’s drawings is similar to that of the most important painters of the time, although they have a number of specifically ‘theatrical’ nuances, such as the framing of the scenes, the variety of lighting effects, especially the underlining, and – perhaps most importantly – the arrangement in successive planes. These drawings are an exemplary combination of romantic evocation and positivist precision. It is no coincidence that Ciceri was a student, son-in-law and friend of the Romantic painter Isabey, and that his closest collaborator in his early years was Daguerre, inventor of the diorama and father of photography. At this crossroads of aesthetic and multidisciplinary convergences, Ciceri’s drawings are undoubtedly a significant expression of the drawing art of his time.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:02:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-249f8f7aa18e449989c8eb2adac01bf8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2280-8841
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:02:40Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
record_format Article
series MDCCC 1800
spelling doaj.art-249f8f7aa18e449989c8eb2adac01bf82023-12-04T09:25:36ZengFondazione Università Ca’ FoscariMDCCC 18002280-88412023-12-0112110.30687/MDCCC/2280-8841/2023/01/006journal_article_14530Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)Muñoz, Tomás 0Universidad Complutense de Madrid Set designers’ drawings have a similar instrumental character to painters’ drawings, but unlike painters’ drawings, set designers’ drawings refer to works that are not exhibited in museums, are not studied by art historians and, for the most part, are not preserved. These circumstances explain the usual reluctance to approach set designers’ drawings. However, these drawings have similar characteristics to those of contemporary painters and can give a very accurate picture of the spirit of an era. This is the case with the drawings of Charles Ciceri (1782‑1868), chief decorator at the Paris Opera and the most important set designer of the first half of the 19th century. His drawings, of unquestionable mastery, represent a wide repertoire of sets imbued with a romantic spirit: ancient ruins, medieval fantasies, orientalist evocations, picturesque natures, etc. The typology of the drawings is also varied: sketches from life, sketches and drawings as inventions for final works (decorations, in the case of Ciceri) and drawings with an autonomous value. The variety of techniques and typologies of Ciceri’s drawings is similar to that of the most important painters of the time, although they have a number of specifically ‘theatrical’ nuances, such as the framing of the scenes, the variety of lighting effects, especially the underlining, and – perhaps most importantly – the arrangement in successive planes. These drawings are an exemplary combination of romantic evocation and positivist precision. It is no coincidence that Ciceri was a student, son-in-law and friend of the Romantic painter Isabey, and that his closest collaborator in his early years was Daguerre, inventor of the diorama and father of photography. At this crossroads of aesthetic and multidisciplinary convergences, Ciceri’s drawings are undoubtedly a significant expression of the drawing art of his time. http://doi.org/10.30687/MDCCC/2280-8841/2023/01/006Drawing. Opera. Romanticism. Scenography. Set design
spellingShingle Muñoz, Tomás
Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)
MDCCC 1800
Drawing. Opera. Romanticism. Scenography. Set design
title Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)
title_full Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)
title_fullStr Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)
title_full_unstemmed Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)
title_short Los dibujos del escenógrafo Charles Ciceri (1782-1868)
title_sort los dibujos del escenografo charles ciceri 1782 1868
topic Drawing. Opera. Romanticism. Scenography. Set design
url http://doi.org/10.30687/MDCCC/2280-8841/2023/01/006
work_keys_str_mv AT munoztomas losdibujosdelescenografocharlesciceri17821868