A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals

Background: The ratio of the difference between neighboring RR intervals to the length of the preceding RR interval (x%) represents the relative change in the duration between two cardiac cycles. We investigated the diagnostic properties of the percentage of relative RR interval differences equal to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Szymon Buś, Konrad Jędrzejewski, Przemysław Guzik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/2/687
_version_ 1797440521725018112
author Szymon Buś
Konrad Jędrzejewski
Przemysław Guzik
author_facet Szymon Buś
Konrad Jędrzejewski
Przemysław Guzik
author_sort Szymon Buś
collection DOAJ
description Background: The ratio of the difference between neighboring RR intervals to the length of the preceding RR interval (x%) represents the relative change in the duration between two cardiac cycles. We investigated the diagnostic properties of the percentage of relative RR interval differences equal to or greater than x% (pRRx%) with x% in a range between 0.25% and 25% for the distinction of atrial fibrillation (AF) from sinus rhythm (SR). Methods: We used 1-min ECG segments with RR intervals with either AF (32,141 segments) or SR (32,769 segments) from the publicly available Physionet Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Database (LTAFDB). The properties of pRRx% for different x% were analyzed using the statistical procedures and metrics commonly used to characterize diagnostic methods. Results: The distributions of pRRx% for AF and SR differ significantly over the whole studied range of x% from 0.25% to 25%, with particularly outstanding diagnostic properties for the x% range of 1.5% to 6%. However, pRR3.25% outperformed other pRRx%. Firstly, it had one of the highest and closest to perfect areas under the curve (0.971). For pRR3.25%, the optimal threshold for distinction AF from SR was set at 75.32%. Then, the accuracy was 95.44%, sensitivity was 97.16%, specificity was 93.76%, the positive predictive value was 93.85%, the negative predictive value was 97.11%, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 514. The excellent diagnostic properties of pRR3.25% were confirmed in the publicly available MIT–BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database. In a direct comparison, pRR3.25% outperformed the diagnostic properties of pRR31 (the percentage of successive RR intervals differing by at least 31 ms), i.e., so far, the best single parameter differentiating AF from SR. Conclusions: A family of pRRx% parameters has excellent diagnostic properties for AF detection in a range of x% between 1.5% and 6%. However, pRR3.25% outperforms other pRRx% parameters and pRR31 (until now, probably the most robust single heart rate variability parameter for AF diagnosis). The exquisite pRRx% diagnostic properties for AF and its simple computation make it well-suited for AF detection in modern ECG technologies (mobile/wearable devices, biopatches) in long-term monitoring. The diagnostic properties of pRRx% deserve further exploration in other databases with AF.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:09:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-24bbc33e20e44d258197688a84512009
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:09:22Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-24bbc33e20e44d258197688a845120092023-11-30T22:53:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-01-0112268710.3390/jcm12020687A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR IntervalsSzymon Buś0Konrad Jędrzejewski1Przemysław Guzik2Institute of Electronic Systems, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, PolandInstitute of Electronic Systems, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Cardiology-Intensive Therapy and Internal Disease, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandBackground: The ratio of the difference between neighboring RR intervals to the length of the preceding RR interval (x%) represents the relative change in the duration between two cardiac cycles. We investigated the diagnostic properties of the percentage of relative RR interval differences equal to or greater than x% (pRRx%) with x% in a range between 0.25% and 25% for the distinction of atrial fibrillation (AF) from sinus rhythm (SR). Methods: We used 1-min ECG segments with RR intervals with either AF (32,141 segments) or SR (32,769 segments) from the publicly available Physionet Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Database (LTAFDB). The properties of pRRx% for different x% were analyzed using the statistical procedures and metrics commonly used to characterize diagnostic methods. Results: The distributions of pRRx% for AF and SR differ significantly over the whole studied range of x% from 0.25% to 25%, with particularly outstanding diagnostic properties for the x% range of 1.5% to 6%. However, pRR3.25% outperformed other pRRx%. Firstly, it had one of the highest and closest to perfect areas under the curve (0.971). For pRR3.25%, the optimal threshold for distinction AF from SR was set at 75.32%. Then, the accuracy was 95.44%, sensitivity was 97.16%, specificity was 93.76%, the positive predictive value was 93.85%, the negative predictive value was 97.11%, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 514. The excellent diagnostic properties of pRR3.25% were confirmed in the publicly available MIT–BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database. In a direct comparison, pRR3.25% outperformed the diagnostic properties of pRR31 (the percentage of successive RR intervals differing by at least 31 ms), i.e., so far, the best single parameter differentiating AF from SR. Conclusions: A family of pRRx% parameters has excellent diagnostic properties for AF detection in a range of x% between 1.5% and 6%. However, pRR3.25% outperforms other pRRx% parameters and pRR31 (until now, probably the most robust single heart rate variability parameter for AF diagnosis). The exquisite pRRx% diagnostic properties for AF and its simple computation make it well-suited for AF detection in modern ECG technologies (mobile/wearable devices, biopatches) in long-term monitoring. The diagnostic properties of pRRx% deserve further exploration in other databases with AF.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/2/687atrial fibrillationcardiac arrhythmiacardiac time serieselectrocardiographyheart rate variabilityRR intervals
spellingShingle Szymon Buś
Konrad Jędrzejewski
Przemysław Guzik
A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals
Journal of Clinical Medicine
atrial fibrillation
cardiac arrhythmia
cardiac time series
electrocardiography
heart rate variability
RR intervals
title A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals
title_full A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals
title_fullStr A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals
title_full_unstemmed A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals
title_short A New Approach to Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Count Statistics of Relative Changes between Consecutive RR Intervals
title_sort new approach to detecting atrial fibrillation using count statistics of relative changes between consecutive rr intervals
topic atrial fibrillation
cardiac arrhythmia
cardiac time series
electrocardiography
heart rate variability
RR intervals
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/2/687
work_keys_str_mv AT szymonbus anewapproachtodetectingatrialfibrillationusingcountstatisticsofrelativechangesbetweenconsecutiverrintervals
AT konradjedrzejewski anewapproachtodetectingatrialfibrillationusingcountstatisticsofrelativechangesbetweenconsecutiverrintervals
AT przemysławguzik anewapproachtodetectingatrialfibrillationusingcountstatisticsofrelativechangesbetweenconsecutiverrintervals
AT szymonbus newapproachtodetectingatrialfibrillationusingcountstatisticsofrelativechangesbetweenconsecutiverrintervals
AT konradjedrzejewski newapproachtodetectingatrialfibrillationusingcountstatisticsofrelativechangesbetweenconsecutiverrintervals
AT przemysławguzik newapproachtodetectingatrialfibrillationusingcountstatisticsofrelativechangesbetweenconsecutiverrintervals