Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic impact of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) in dogs with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or preceded by alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM).Study DesignProspective randomized clinical trial.A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renata R. Rodrigues, Aline M. Ambrósio, Aline M. Engbruch, Lucas A. Gonçalves, Paula A. Villela, Ana F. Sanchez, Denise T. Fantoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.842613/full
_version_ 1811215695084519424
author Renata R. Rodrigues
Aline M. Ambrósio
Aline M. Engbruch
Lucas A. Gonçalves
Paula A. Villela
Ana F. Sanchez
Denise T. Fantoni
author_facet Renata R. Rodrigues
Aline M. Ambrósio
Aline M. Engbruch
Lucas A. Gonçalves
Paula A. Villela
Ana F. Sanchez
Denise T. Fantoni
author_sort Renata R. Rodrigues
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo evaluate gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic impact of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) in dogs with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or preceded by alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM).Study DesignProspective randomized clinical trial.AnimalsTwenty-one healthy client-owned mesocephalic healthy dogs, 1–7 years old, weighing 10–20 kg, and body condition scores 4–6/9 admitted for periodontal treatment.MethodsIsoflurane-anesthetized dogs in dorsal recumbency were ventilated until 1 h with a volume-controlled ventilation mode using 8 mL kg−1 of VT. The dogs were distributed in 2 groups: in the ARM group, PEEP starts in 0 cmH2O, increasing gradually 5 cmH2O every 3 min, until reach 15 cmH2O and decreasing in the same steps until 5 cmH2O, maintaining this value until the end; and PEEP group, in which the pressure 5 cmH2O was instituted from the beginning of anesthesia and maintained the same level up to the end of the anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary, metabolic, oxygenation parameters, and respiratory mechanics were recorded after the anesthesia induction (baseline—BL), 15, 45, and 75 min after BL and during the recovery.ResultsThe ARM increased the static compliance (Cst) (15 min after baseline) when compared with baseline moment (24.9 ± 5.8 mL cmH20−1 vs. 20.7 ± 5.4 mL cmH20−1–p = 0.0364), oxygenation index (PaO2/FIO2) (505.6 ± 59.2 mmHg vs. 461.2 ± 41.0 mmHg—p = 0.0453) and reduced the shunt fraction (3.4 ± 2.4% vs. 5.5 ± 1.6%—p = 0.062). In the PEEP group, no statistical differences were observed concerning the variables evaluated. At the beginning of the evaluation, the driving pressure (DP) before ARM was significantly greater than all other evaluation time points (6.9 ± 1.8 cmH20).Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceThe use of 8 mL kg−1 of VT and 5 cmH20 PEEP without ARM maintain adequate oxygenation and mechanical ventilation in dental surgeries for up to 1 h. The use of ARM slightly improved compliance and oxygenation during the maneuver.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:26:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-24bf64452bc24b2786fe375b550e98e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:26:44Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-24bf64452bc24b2786fe375b550e98e52022-12-22T03:44:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692022-03-01910.3389/fvets.2022.842613842613Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical TrialRenata R. RodriguesAline M. AmbrósioAline M. EngbruchLucas A. GonçalvesPaula A. VillelaAna F. SanchezDenise T. FantoniObjectiveTo evaluate gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic impact of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) in dogs with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or preceded by alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM).Study DesignProspective randomized clinical trial.AnimalsTwenty-one healthy client-owned mesocephalic healthy dogs, 1–7 years old, weighing 10–20 kg, and body condition scores 4–6/9 admitted for periodontal treatment.MethodsIsoflurane-anesthetized dogs in dorsal recumbency were ventilated until 1 h with a volume-controlled ventilation mode using 8 mL kg−1 of VT. The dogs were distributed in 2 groups: in the ARM group, PEEP starts in 0 cmH2O, increasing gradually 5 cmH2O every 3 min, until reach 15 cmH2O and decreasing in the same steps until 5 cmH2O, maintaining this value until the end; and PEEP group, in which the pressure 5 cmH2O was instituted from the beginning of anesthesia and maintained the same level up to the end of the anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary, metabolic, oxygenation parameters, and respiratory mechanics were recorded after the anesthesia induction (baseline—BL), 15, 45, and 75 min after BL and during the recovery.ResultsThe ARM increased the static compliance (Cst) (15 min after baseline) when compared with baseline moment (24.9 ± 5.8 mL cmH20−1 vs. 20.7 ± 5.4 mL cmH20−1–p = 0.0364), oxygenation index (PaO2/FIO2) (505.6 ± 59.2 mmHg vs. 461.2 ± 41.0 mmHg—p = 0.0453) and reduced the shunt fraction (3.4 ± 2.4% vs. 5.5 ± 1.6%—p = 0.062). In the PEEP group, no statistical differences were observed concerning the variables evaluated. At the beginning of the evaluation, the driving pressure (DP) before ARM was significantly greater than all other evaluation time points (6.9 ± 1.8 cmH20).Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceThe use of 8 mL kg−1 of VT and 5 cmH20 PEEP without ARM maintain adequate oxygenation and mechanical ventilation in dental surgeries for up to 1 h. The use of ARM slightly improved compliance and oxygenation during the maneuver.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.842613/fullmechanical ventilationlow tidal volumealveolar recruitment maneuverpositive end-expiratory pressuregas exchangeventilatory mechanics
spellingShingle Renata R. Rodrigues
Aline M. Ambrósio
Aline M. Engbruch
Lucas A. Gonçalves
Paula A. Villela
Ana F. Sanchez
Denise T. Fantoni
Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
mechanical ventilation
low tidal volume
alveolar recruitment maneuver
positive end-expiratory pressure
gas exchange
ventilatory mechanics
title Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in dogs a randomized clinical trial
topic mechanical ventilation
low tidal volume
alveolar recruitment maneuver
positive end-expiratory pressure
gas exchange
ventilatory mechanics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.842613/full
work_keys_str_mv AT renatarrodrigues intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT alinemambrosio intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT alinemengbruch intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lucasagoncalves intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT paulaavillela intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT anafsanchez intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT denisetfantoni intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial