Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study

Abstract Background Cage subsidence causes poor prognoses in patients treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Deterioration of the biomechanical environment initially triggers cage subsidence, and patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) suffer a higher risk of cage subsidence. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi-Qiang Yang, Ping Cai, Jing-Chi Li, Xian-Di Wang, Tian-Hang Xie, Xing-Xiao Pu, Run Lin, Jian-Cheng Zeng, Yue-Ming Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06049-3
_version_ 1798005333035057152
author Zhi-Qiang Yang
Ping Cai
Jing-Chi Li
Xian-Di Wang
Tian-Hang Xie
Xing-Xiao Pu
Run Lin
Jian-Cheng Zeng
Yue-Ming Song
author_facet Zhi-Qiang Yang
Ping Cai
Jing-Chi Li
Xian-Di Wang
Tian-Hang Xie
Xing-Xiao Pu
Run Lin
Jian-Cheng Zeng
Yue-Ming Song
author_sort Zhi-Qiang Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cage subsidence causes poor prognoses in patients treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Deterioration of the biomechanical environment initially triggers cage subsidence, and patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) suffer a higher risk of cage subsidence. However, whether low BMD increases the risk of cage subsidence by deteriorating the local biomechanical environment has not been clearly identified. Methods OLIF without additional fixation (stand-alone, S-A) and with different additional fixation devices (AFDs), including anterolateral single rod screws (ALSRs) and bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) fixation, was simulated in the L4-L5 segment of a well-validated finite element model. The biomechanical effects of different BMDs were investigated by adjusting the material properties of bony structures. Biomechanical indicators related to cage subsidence were computed and recorded under different directional moments. Results Overall, low BMD triggers stress concentration in surgical segment, the highest equivalent stress can be observed in osteoporosis models under most loading conditions. Compared with the flexion-extension loading condition, this variation tendency was more pronounced under bending and rotation loading conditions. In addition, AFDs obviously reduced the stress concentration on both bony endplates and the OLIF cage, and the maximum stress on ALSRs was evidently higher than that on BPSs under almost all loading conditions. Conclusions Stepwise reduction of BMD increases the risk of a poor local biomechanical environment in OLIF patients, and regular anti-osteoporosis therapy should be considered an effective method to biomechanically optimize the prognosis of OLIF patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:37:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-24d616974f91469899906d6995bec63e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:37:27Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-24d616974f91469899906d6995bec63e2022-12-22T04:23:35ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742022-12-0123111310.1186/s12891-022-06049-3Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico studyZhi-Qiang Yang0Ping Cai1Jing-Chi Li2Xian-Di Wang3Tian-Hang Xie4Xing-Xiao Pu5Run Lin6Jian-Cheng Zeng7Yue-Ming Song8Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background Cage subsidence causes poor prognoses in patients treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Deterioration of the biomechanical environment initially triggers cage subsidence, and patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) suffer a higher risk of cage subsidence. However, whether low BMD increases the risk of cage subsidence by deteriorating the local biomechanical environment has not been clearly identified. Methods OLIF without additional fixation (stand-alone, S-A) and with different additional fixation devices (AFDs), including anterolateral single rod screws (ALSRs) and bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) fixation, was simulated in the L4-L5 segment of a well-validated finite element model. The biomechanical effects of different BMDs were investigated by adjusting the material properties of bony structures. Biomechanical indicators related to cage subsidence were computed and recorded under different directional moments. Results Overall, low BMD triggers stress concentration in surgical segment, the highest equivalent stress can be observed in osteoporosis models under most loading conditions. Compared with the flexion-extension loading condition, this variation tendency was more pronounced under bending and rotation loading conditions. In addition, AFDs obviously reduced the stress concentration on both bony endplates and the OLIF cage, and the maximum stress on ALSRs was evidently higher than that on BPSs under almost all loading conditions. Conclusions Stepwise reduction of BMD increases the risk of a poor local biomechanical environment in OLIF patients, and regular anti-osteoporosis therapy should be considered an effective method to biomechanically optimize the prognosis of OLIF patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06049-3Oblique lumbar interbody fusionBone mineral densityCage subsidenceBiomechanicsFinite element analysis
spellingShingle Zhi-Qiang Yang
Ping Cai
Jing-Chi Li
Xian-Di Wang
Tian-Hang Xie
Xing-Xiao Pu
Run Lin
Jian-Cheng Zeng
Yue-Ming Song
Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Bone mineral density
Cage subsidence
Biomechanics
Finite element analysis
title Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
title_full Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
title_fullStr Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
title_full_unstemmed Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
title_short Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
title_sort stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically an in silico study
topic Oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Bone mineral density
Cage subsidence
Biomechanics
Finite element analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06049-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiqiangyang stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT pingcai stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT jingchili stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT xiandiwang stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT tianhangxie stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT xingxiaopu stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT runlin stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT jianchengzeng stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy
AT yuemingsong stepwisereductionofbonemineraldensityincreasestheriskofcagesubsidenceinobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionpatientsbiomechanicallyaninsilicostudy