Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods

Typically, background noise of different types and levels is present during the measurement of the impulse response in spaces. The two methods that are, in practice, most frequently used in the measurement of the impulse response, are the exponential sine sweep (ESS), and the maximum length sequence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikolaos M. Papadakis, Smaro Antoniadou, Georgios E. Stavroulakis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Acoustics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2624-599X/5/2/34
_version_ 1797596603986477056
author Nikolaos M. Papadakis
Smaro Antoniadou
Georgios E. Stavroulakis
author_facet Nikolaos M. Papadakis
Smaro Antoniadou
Georgios E. Stavroulakis
author_sort Nikolaos M. Papadakis
collection DOAJ
description Typically, background noise of different types and levels is present during the measurement of the impulse response in spaces. The two methods that are, in practice, most frequently used in the measurement of the impulse response, are the exponential sine sweep (ESS), and the maximum length sequence (MLS). This study’s objective was to estimate the impact of background noise (white noise, tonal noise) on the acoustic parameters (<i>T</i><sub>30</sub>, EDT, <i>C</i><sub>80</sub>, and <i>D</i><sub>50</sub>) for ESS and MLS measurements, by introducing artificial background noise, employing an external sound source. For this purpose, measurements were performed with varying levels of external noise (in steps of 2 dB), and the effect was assessed, using the relative error compared to measurements without artificial background noise. According to the findings for white noise (as background noise), in the case of <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> and EDT, the difference between the two methods, as well as the relative error, for the initial levels of added background noise, was small. However, for higher levels of added background noise, there was a sharp increase in the relative error, which was greater for the ESS method, both for <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> and EDT. Regarding <i>C</i><sub>80</sub> and <i>D</i><sub>50</sub>, while initially the differences between the ESS and MLS methods were small, cumulatively, as the background noise increased, the relative error increased for both methods, with the ESS method showing the largest error. In the case of tonal noise (as background noise), the results were consistent with those observed in the case of white noise. The study’s findings contribute to a better understanding of the ESS and MLS methods, and suggest the expected relative error of acoustic parameters when various types and levels of background noise are present. Additionally, the study suggests, based on background noise and level, the optimum method to conduct impulse response measurements.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:53:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2507cbe337264a718d478a52d557f0d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-599X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:53:32Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Acoustics
spelling doaj.art-2507cbe337264a718d478a52d557f0d52023-11-18T08:48:24ZengMDPI AGAcoustics2624-599X2023-06-015256357410.3390/acoustics5020034Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS MethodsNikolaos M. Papadakis0Smaro Antoniadou1Georgios E. Stavroulakis2Institute of Computational Mechanics and Optimization (Co.Mec.O), School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, GreeceInstitute of Computational Mechanics and Optimization (Co.Mec.O), School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, GreeceInstitute of Computational Mechanics and Optimization (Co.Mec.O), School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, GreeceTypically, background noise of different types and levels is present during the measurement of the impulse response in spaces. The two methods that are, in practice, most frequently used in the measurement of the impulse response, are the exponential sine sweep (ESS), and the maximum length sequence (MLS). This study’s objective was to estimate the impact of background noise (white noise, tonal noise) on the acoustic parameters (<i>T</i><sub>30</sub>, EDT, <i>C</i><sub>80</sub>, and <i>D</i><sub>50</sub>) for ESS and MLS measurements, by introducing artificial background noise, employing an external sound source. For this purpose, measurements were performed with varying levels of external noise (in steps of 2 dB), and the effect was assessed, using the relative error compared to measurements without artificial background noise. According to the findings for white noise (as background noise), in the case of <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> and EDT, the difference between the two methods, as well as the relative error, for the initial levels of added background noise, was small. However, for higher levels of added background noise, there was a sharp increase in the relative error, which was greater for the ESS method, both for <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> and EDT. Regarding <i>C</i><sub>80</sub> and <i>D</i><sub>50</sub>, while initially the differences between the ESS and MLS methods were small, cumulatively, as the background noise increased, the relative error increased for both methods, with the ESS method showing the largest error. In the case of tonal noise (as background noise), the results were consistent with those observed in the case of white noise. The study’s findings contribute to a better understanding of the ESS and MLS methods, and suggest the expected relative error of acoustic parameters when various types and levels of background noise are present. Additionally, the study suggests, based on background noise and level, the optimum method to conduct impulse response measurements.https://www.mdpi.com/2624-599X/5/2/34acoustic measurementexponential sine sweepmaximum length sequenceroom acousticsISO 3382-1:2009impulse response
spellingShingle Nikolaos M. Papadakis
Smaro Antoniadou
Georgios E. Stavroulakis
Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods
Acoustics
acoustic measurement
exponential sine sweep
maximum length sequence
room acoustics
ISO 3382-1:2009
impulse response
title Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods
title_full Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods
title_fullStr Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods
title_short Effects of Varying Levels of Background Noise on Room Acoustic Parameters, Measured with ESS and MLS Methods
title_sort effects of varying levels of background noise on room acoustic parameters measured with ess and mls methods
topic acoustic measurement
exponential sine sweep
maximum length sequence
room acoustics
ISO 3382-1:2009
impulse response
url https://www.mdpi.com/2624-599X/5/2/34
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaosmpapadakis effectsofvaryinglevelsofbackgroundnoiseonroomacousticparametersmeasuredwithessandmlsmethods
AT smaroantoniadou effectsofvaryinglevelsofbackgroundnoiseonroomacousticparametersmeasuredwithessandmlsmethods
AT georgiosestavroulakis effectsofvaryinglevelsofbackgroundnoiseonroomacousticparametersmeasuredwithessandmlsmethods