Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses

Manual material handling (MMH) is considered as one of the main contributors to low back pain. While males traditionally perform MMH tasks, recently the number of females who undertake these physically-demanding activities is also increasing. To evaluate the risk of mechanical injuries, the majority...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Firouzabadi, Navid Arjmand, Fumin Pan, Thomas Zander, Hendrik Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.750862/full
_version_ 1818939021277003776
author Ali Firouzabadi
Navid Arjmand
Fumin Pan
Thomas Zander
Hendrik Schmidt
author_facet Ali Firouzabadi
Navid Arjmand
Fumin Pan
Thomas Zander
Hendrik Schmidt
author_sort Ali Firouzabadi
collection DOAJ
description Manual material handling (MMH) is considered as one of the main contributors to low back pain. While males traditionally perform MMH tasks, recently the number of females who undertake these physically-demanding activities is also increasing. To evaluate the risk of mechanical injuries, the majority of previous studies have estimated spinal forces using different modeling approaches that mostly focus on male individuals. Notable sex-dependent differences have, however, been reported in torso muscle strength and anatomy, segmental mass distribution, as well as lifting strategy during MMH. Therefore, this study aimed to use sex-specific models to estimate lumbar spinal and muscle forces during static MHH tasks in 10 healthy males and 10 females. Motion-capture, surface electromyographic from select trunk muscles, and ground reaction force data were simultaneously collected while subjects performed twelve symmetric and asymmetric static lifting (10 kg) tasks. AnyBody Modeling System was used to develop base-models (subject-specific segmental length, muscle architecture, and kinematics data) for both sexes. For females, female-specific models were also developed by taking into account for the female’s muscle physiological cross-sectional areas, segmental mass distributions, and body fat percentage. Males showed higher absolute L5-S1 compressive and shear loads as compared to both female base-models (25.3% compressive and 14% shear) and female-specific models (41% compressive and 23.6% shear). When the predicted spine loads were normalized to subjects’ body weight, however, female base-models showed larger loads (9% compressive and 16.2% shear on average), and female-specific models showed 2.4% smaller and 9.4% larger loads than males. Females showed larger forces in oblique abdominal muscles during both symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks, while males had larger back extensor muscle forces during symmetric lifting tasks. A stronger correlation between measured and predicted muscle activities was found in females than males. Results indicate that female-specific characteristics affect the predicted spinal loads and must be considered in musculoskeletal models. Neglecting sex-specific parameters in these models could lead to the overestimation of spinal loads in females.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T06:17:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-251af46a17484a94bac13f95b598aca8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-4185
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T06:17:07Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-251af46a17484a94bac13f95b598aca82022-12-21T19:50:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852021-11-01910.3389/fbioe.2021.750862750862Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico AnalysesAli Firouzabadi0Navid Arjmand1Fumin Pan2Thomas Zander3Hendrik Schmidt4Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, IranJulius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyJulius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyJulius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyManual material handling (MMH) is considered as one of the main contributors to low back pain. While males traditionally perform MMH tasks, recently the number of females who undertake these physically-demanding activities is also increasing. To evaluate the risk of mechanical injuries, the majority of previous studies have estimated spinal forces using different modeling approaches that mostly focus on male individuals. Notable sex-dependent differences have, however, been reported in torso muscle strength and anatomy, segmental mass distribution, as well as lifting strategy during MMH. Therefore, this study aimed to use sex-specific models to estimate lumbar spinal and muscle forces during static MHH tasks in 10 healthy males and 10 females. Motion-capture, surface electromyographic from select trunk muscles, and ground reaction force data were simultaneously collected while subjects performed twelve symmetric and asymmetric static lifting (10 kg) tasks. AnyBody Modeling System was used to develop base-models (subject-specific segmental length, muscle architecture, and kinematics data) for both sexes. For females, female-specific models were also developed by taking into account for the female’s muscle physiological cross-sectional areas, segmental mass distributions, and body fat percentage. Males showed higher absolute L5-S1 compressive and shear loads as compared to both female base-models (25.3% compressive and 14% shear) and female-specific models (41% compressive and 23.6% shear). When the predicted spine loads were normalized to subjects’ body weight, however, female base-models showed larger loads (9% compressive and 16.2% shear on average), and female-specific models showed 2.4% smaller and 9.4% larger loads than males. Females showed larger forces in oblique abdominal muscles during both symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks, while males had larger back extensor muscle forces during symmetric lifting tasks. A stronger correlation between measured and predicted muscle activities was found in females than males. Results indicate that female-specific characteristics affect the predicted spinal loads and must be considered in musculoskeletal models. Neglecting sex-specific parameters in these models could lead to the overestimation of spinal loads in females.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.750862/fullmanual material handlingspinal loadstrunk muscle forcessex differencesmusculoskeletal models
spellingShingle Ali Firouzabadi
Navid Arjmand
Fumin Pan
Thomas Zander
Hendrik Schmidt
Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
manual material handling
spinal loads
trunk muscle forces
sex differences
musculoskeletal models
title Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses
title_full Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses
title_fullStr Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses
title_short Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities—Combined in vivo and in silico Analyses
title_sort sex dependent estimation of spinal loads during static manual material handling activities combined in vivo and in silico analyses
topic manual material handling
spinal loads
trunk muscle forces
sex differences
musculoskeletal models
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.750862/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alifirouzabadi sexdependentestimationofspinalloadsduringstaticmanualmaterialhandlingactivitiescombinedinvivoandinsilicoanalyses
AT navidarjmand sexdependentestimationofspinalloadsduringstaticmanualmaterialhandlingactivitiescombinedinvivoandinsilicoanalyses
AT fuminpan sexdependentestimationofspinalloadsduringstaticmanualmaterialhandlingactivitiescombinedinvivoandinsilicoanalyses
AT thomaszander sexdependentestimationofspinalloadsduringstaticmanualmaterialhandlingactivitiescombinedinvivoandinsilicoanalyses
AT hendrikschmidt sexdependentestimationofspinalloadsduringstaticmanualmaterialhandlingactivitiescombinedinvivoandinsilicoanalyses