Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center

ObjectiveIndications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) cycles and clinical outcomes were evaluated at CHA Gangnam Medical Center.MethodsThis is retrospective cohort study. All patients (n=336) who went through in vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGD/PGS cyc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Se Yeon Won, Hannah Kim, Woo Sik Lee, Ji Won Kim, Sung Han Shim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018-01-01
Series:Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ogscience.org/upload/pdf/ogs-61-95.pdf
_version_ 1818300356797399040
author Se Yeon Won
Hannah Kim
Woo Sik Lee
Ji Won Kim
Sung Han Shim
author_facet Se Yeon Won
Hannah Kim
Woo Sik Lee
Ji Won Kim
Sung Han Shim
author_sort Se Yeon Won
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveIndications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) cycles and clinical outcomes were evaluated at CHA Gangnam Medical Center.MethodsThis is retrospective cohort study. All patients (n=336) who went through in vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGD/PGS cycles (n=486) between January 2014 and December 2015 were included in Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. Patients underwent IVF-PGD/PGS with 24-chromosome screening. Patients with euploid embryos had transfer of one or 2 embryos in a fresh cycle with any subsequent frozen embryo transfer (ET) cycle. Compared implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and early abortion rates were the main outcome measures.ResultsThe most common indication for PGD/PGS was recurrent spontaneous abortion (n=160). The chromosome rearrangement cases (n=116) included 24 Robertsonian translocations, 60 reciprocal translocations, 3 inversions, 2 deletions, 4 additions, and 23 mosaicisms. PGS cases rather than the PGD cases showed higher implantation rates (26.4% vs. 20.3%), ongoing pregnancy rates (19.5% vs. 16.4%), and clinical pregnancy rates (28.6% vs. 23.3%). Implantation rates (30.3% vs. 23.7%), clinical pregnancy rates (39.2% vs. 25.2%), and ongoing pregnancy rates (25.7% vs. 17.5%) were significant higher in the blastocyst evaluation group than cleavage stage evaluation group.ConclusionThis was the largest study of PGD/PGS for 2 years at a single center in Korea. The pregnancy outcomes of PGD cases are slightly lower than PGS cases. It was confirmed again that success rate of PGD/PGS is higher if biopsy was done at blastocyst than cleavage stage.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:05:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2526b7274566453794981edd944dc211
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-8572
2287-8580
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:05:49Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
record_format Article
series Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
spelling doaj.art-2526b7274566453794981edd944dc2112022-12-21T23:58:40ZengKorean Society of Obstetrics and GynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology Science2287-85722287-85802018-01-016119510110.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.95555Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single centerSe Yeon Won0Hannah Kim1Woo Sik Lee2Ji Won Kim3Sung Han Shim4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, .KoreaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, .KoreaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, .KoreaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, .KoreaGenetics Laboratory, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, .KoreaObjectiveIndications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) cycles and clinical outcomes were evaluated at CHA Gangnam Medical Center.MethodsThis is retrospective cohort study. All patients (n=336) who went through in vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGD/PGS cycles (n=486) between January 2014 and December 2015 were included in Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. Patients underwent IVF-PGD/PGS with 24-chromosome screening. Patients with euploid embryos had transfer of one or 2 embryos in a fresh cycle with any subsequent frozen embryo transfer (ET) cycle. Compared implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and early abortion rates were the main outcome measures.ResultsThe most common indication for PGD/PGS was recurrent spontaneous abortion (n=160). The chromosome rearrangement cases (n=116) included 24 Robertsonian translocations, 60 reciprocal translocations, 3 inversions, 2 deletions, 4 additions, and 23 mosaicisms. PGS cases rather than the PGD cases showed higher implantation rates (26.4% vs. 20.3%), ongoing pregnancy rates (19.5% vs. 16.4%), and clinical pregnancy rates (28.6% vs. 23.3%). Implantation rates (30.3% vs. 23.7%), clinical pregnancy rates (39.2% vs. 25.2%), and ongoing pregnancy rates (25.7% vs. 17.5%) were significant higher in the blastocyst evaluation group than cleavage stage evaluation group.ConclusionThis was the largest study of PGD/PGS for 2 years at a single center in Korea. The pregnancy outcomes of PGD cases are slightly lower than PGS cases. It was confirmed again that success rate of PGD/PGS is higher if biopsy was done at blastocyst than cleavage stage.http://ogscience.org/upload/pdf/ogs-61-95.pdf fertilizationpreimplantation genetic diagnosis
spellingShingle Se Yeon Won
Hannah Kim
Woo Sik Lee
Ji Won Kim
Sung Han Shim
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
fertilization
preimplantation genetic diagnosis
title Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center
title_full Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center
title_fullStr Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center
title_full_unstemmed Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center
title_short Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center
title_sort pre implantation genetic diagnosis and pre implantation genetic screening two years experience at a single center
topic fertilization
preimplantation genetic diagnosis
url http://ogscience.org/upload/pdf/ogs-61-95.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seyeonwon preimplantationgeneticdiagnosisandpreimplantationgeneticscreeningtwoyearsexperienceatasinglecenter
AT hannahkim preimplantationgeneticdiagnosisandpreimplantationgeneticscreeningtwoyearsexperienceatasinglecenter
AT woosiklee preimplantationgeneticdiagnosisandpreimplantationgeneticscreeningtwoyearsexperienceatasinglecenter
AT jiwonkim preimplantationgeneticdiagnosisandpreimplantationgeneticscreeningtwoyearsexperienceatasinglecenter
AT sunghanshim preimplantationgeneticdiagnosisandpreimplantationgeneticscreeningtwoyearsexperienceatasinglecenter