Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration

The human-in-the-loop technology requires studies on sensory-motor characteristics of each hand for an effective human–robot collaboration. This study aims to investigate the differences in visuomotor control between the dominant (DH) and non-dominant hands in tracking a target in the three-dimensio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanjin Jo, Woong Choi, Geonhui Lee, Wookhyun Park, Jaehyo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/21/6368
_version_ 1827702602704355328
author Hanjin Jo
Woong Choi
Geonhui Lee
Wookhyun Park
Jaehyo Kim
author_facet Hanjin Jo
Woong Choi
Geonhui Lee
Wookhyun Park
Jaehyo Kim
author_sort Hanjin Jo
collection DOAJ
description The human-in-the-loop technology requires studies on sensory-motor characteristics of each hand for an effective human–robot collaboration. This study aims to investigate the differences in visuomotor control between the dominant (DH) and non-dominant hands in tracking a target in the three-dimensional space. We compared the circular tracking performances of the hands on the frontal plane of the virtual reality space in terms of radial position error (Δ<i>R</i>), phase error (Δ<i>θ</i>), acceleration error (Δ<i>a</i>), and dimensionless squared jerk (<i>DSJ</i>) at four different speeds for 30 subjects. Δ<i>R</i> and Δ<i>θ</i> significantly differed at relatively high speeds (Δ<i>R</i>: 0.5 Hz; Δ<i>θ</i>: <i>0</i>.5, 0.75 Hz), with maximum values of ≤1% compared to the target trajectory radius. <i>DSJ</i> significantly differed only at low speeds (0.125, 0.25 Hz), whereas Δ<i>a</i> significantly differed at all speeds. In summary, the feedback-control mechanism of the DH has a wider range of speed control capability and is efficient according to an energy saving model. The central nervous system (CNS) uses different models for the two hands, which react dissimilarly. Despite the precise control of the DH, both hands exhibited dependences on limb kinematic properties at high speeds (0.75 Hz). Thus, the CNS uses a different strategy according to the model for optimal results.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:00:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-252d6e15f41e43c9aca2792f0fed23a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:00:35Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-252d6e15f41e43c9aca2792f0fed23a12023-11-20T20:12:24ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-11-012021636810.3390/s20216368Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot CollaborationHanjin Jo0Woong Choi1Geonhui Lee2Wookhyun Park3Jaehyo Kim4Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Handong Global University, Pohang 37554, KoreaDepartment of Information and Computer Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Gunma College, Maebashi 371–8530, JapanDepartment of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Handong Global University, Pohang 37554, KoreaDepartment of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Handong Global University, Pohang 37554, KoreaDepartment of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Handong Global University, Pohang 37554, KoreaThe human-in-the-loop technology requires studies on sensory-motor characteristics of each hand for an effective human–robot collaboration. This study aims to investigate the differences in visuomotor control between the dominant (DH) and non-dominant hands in tracking a target in the three-dimensional space. We compared the circular tracking performances of the hands on the frontal plane of the virtual reality space in terms of radial position error (Δ<i>R</i>), phase error (Δ<i>θ</i>), acceleration error (Δ<i>a</i>), and dimensionless squared jerk (<i>DSJ</i>) at four different speeds for 30 subjects. Δ<i>R</i> and Δ<i>θ</i> significantly differed at relatively high speeds (Δ<i>R</i>: 0.5 Hz; Δ<i>θ</i>: <i>0</i>.5, 0.75 Hz), with maximum values of ≤1% compared to the target trajectory radius. <i>DSJ</i> significantly differed only at low speeds (0.125, 0.25 Hz), whereas Δ<i>a</i> significantly differed at all speeds. In summary, the feedback-control mechanism of the DH has a wider range of speed control capability and is efficient according to an energy saving model. The central nervous system (CNS) uses different models for the two hands, which react dissimilarly. Despite the precise control of the DH, both hands exhibited dependences on limb kinematic properties at high speeds (0.75 Hz). Thus, the CNS uses a different strategy according to the model for optimal results.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/21/6368visuomotorhand dominancecontrol mechanismspatio-temporaltracking target
spellingShingle Hanjin Jo
Woong Choi
Geonhui Lee
Wookhyun Park
Jaehyo Kim
Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration
Sensors
visuomotor
hand dominance
control mechanism
spatio-temporal
tracking target
title Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration
title_full Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration
title_fullStr Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration
title_short Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration
title_sort analysis of visuo motor control between dominant hand and non dominant hand for effective human robot collaboration
topic visuomotor
hand dominance
control mechanism
spatio-temporal
tracking target
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/21/6368
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjinjo analysisofvisuomotorcontrolbetweendominanthandandnondominanthandforeffectivehumanrobotcollaboration
AT woongchoi analysisofvisuomotorcontrolbetweendominanthandandnondominanthandforeffectivehumanrobotcollaboration
AT geonhuilee analysisofvisuomotorcontrolbetweendominanthandandnondominanthandforeffectivehumanrobotcollaboration
AT wookhyunpark analysisofvisuomotorcontrolbetweendominanthandandnondominanthandforeffectivehumanrobotcollaboration
AT jaehyokim analysisofvisuomotorcontrolbetweendominanthandandnondominanthandforeffectivehumanrobotcollaboration