Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections

Though the Framers intended for the Sixth Amendment to secure criminal defendants’ right to a fair trial by providing them with the right to effective assistance of counsel, the full right to effective assistance of counsel is not currently guaranteed. A recent Sixth Circuit case, Turner v. United S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shane Rogers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2019-09-01
Series:Columbia Journal of Race and Law
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/3412
_version_ 1818787430755467264
author Shane Rogers
author_facet Shane Rogers
author_sort Shane Rogers
collection DOAJ
description Though the Framers intended for the Sixth Amendment to secure criminal defendants’ right to a fair trial by providing them with the right to effective assistance of counsel, the full right to effective assistance of counsel is not currently guaranteed. A recent Sixth Circuit case, Turner v. United States, held that a defendant does not have the right to effective assistance of counsel until the right to counsel attaches. This is troubling given that in Turner, the defendant, John Turner, received a sentence ten years greater than the sentence he would have received but for his state counsel’s ineffectiveness. The Sixth Circuit rejected Turner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim because under current jurisprudence, the right to counsel has a bright-line rule: it does not attach until an indictment is brought or the defendant is brought before a judge. Turner’s attorney for his state case negotiated a plea deal with federal prosecutors before a federal indictment was brought, and therefore, the right to counsel did not attach in the federal case. Thus, Turner did not have the right to effective assistance of counsel. This tension between ineffective assistance of counsel and when the right to such counsel attaches is striking: it deprives criminal defendants of a Sixth Amendment right. Courts can resolve this tension, however, by recognizing that (1) effective assistance of counsel is an independent Sixth Amendment right; (2) the right to counsel raises different administrative and fairness concerns than effective assistance of counsel; and (3) courts apply the different strands of the Sixth Amendment independently, differently, and respective of the concerns the particular case raises. Furthermore, courts should promptly resolve this tension because the racial disparity in outcomes indicates that Turner situations will fall unevenly along poor and minority lines. The Sixth Amendment will not completely and effectively fulfill its purpose of guaranteeing criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counsel unless it is properly interpreted to protect defendants like John Turner.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T14:07:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-254c1d4832434271a1c0527feca2d9a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2155-2401
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T14:07:39Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Columbia University Libraries
record_format Article
series Columbia Journal of Race and Law
spelling doaj.art-254c1d4832434271a1c0527feca2d9a62022-12-21T21:05:13ZengColumbia University LibrariesColumbia Journal of Race and Law2155-24012019-09-019210.7916/cjrl.v9i2.3412Providing Broader Sixth Amendment ProtectionsShane RogersThough the Framers intended for the Sixth Amendment to secure criminal defendants’ right to a fair trial by providing them with the right to effective assistance of counsel, the full right to effective assistance of counsel is not currently guaranteed. A recent Sixth Circuit case, Turner v. United States, held that a defendant does not have the right to effective assistance of counsel until the right to counsel attaches. This is troubling given that in Turner, the defendant, John Turner, received a sentence ten years greater than the sentence he would have received but for his state counsel’s ineffectiveness. The Sixth Circuit rejected Turner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim because under current jurisprudence, the right to counsel has a bright-line rule: it does not attach until an indictment is brought or the defendant is brought before a judge. Turner’s attorney for his state case negotiated a plea deal with federal prosecutors before a federal indictment was brought, and therefore, the right to counsel did not attach in the federal case. Thus, Turner did not have the right to effective assistance of counsel. This tension between ineffective assistance of counsel and when the right to such counsel attaches is striking: it deprives criminal defendants of a Sixth Amendment right. Courts can resolve this tension, however, by recognizing that (1) effective assistance of counsel is an independent Sixth Amendment right; (2) the right to counsel raises different administrative and fairness concerns than effective assistance of counsel; and (3) courts apply the different strands of the Sixth Amendment independently, differently, and respective of the concerns the particular case raises. Furthermore, courts should promptly resolve this tension because the racial disparity in outcomes indicates that Turner situations will fall unevenly along poor and minority lines. The Sixth Amendment will not completely and effectively fulfill its purpose of guaranteeing criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counsel unless it is properly interpreted to protect defendants like John Turner.https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/3412
spellingShingle Shane Rogers
Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections
Columbia Journal of Race and Law
title Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections
title_full Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections
title_fullStr Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections
title_full_unstemmed Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections
title_short Providing Broader Sixth Amendment Protections
title_sort providing broader sixth amendment protections
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/3412
work_keys_str_mv AT shanerogers providingbroadersixthamendmentprotections