| Summary: | This paper investigates the robustness of a single 3D volumetric corner-supported module made of square hollow-section (SHS) columns. Typically, the moment–rotation (M-θ) behaviour of connections within the module (intra-module) is assumed to be fully rigid rather than semi-rigid, resulting in inaccurate assessment (i.e., overestimated vertical stiffness) during extreme loading events, such as progressive collapse. The intra-module connections are not capable of rigidly transferring the moment from the beams to the SHS columns. In this paper, a computationally intensive shell element model (SEM) of the module frame is created. The M-θ relationship of the intra-module connections in the SEM is firstly validated against test results by others and then replicated in a new simplified phenomenological beam element model (BEM), using nonlinear spring elements to capture the M-θ relationship. Comparing the structural behaviour of the SEM and BEM, under notional support removal, shows that the proposed BEM with semi-rigid connections (SR-BEM) agrees well with the validated SEM and requires substantially lower modelling time (98.7% lower) and computational effort (97.4% less RAM). When compared to a BEM with the typically modelled fully rigid intra-module connections (FR-BEM), the vertical displacement in the SR-BEM is at least 16% higher. The results demonstrate the importance of an accurate assessment of framing rotational stiffness and the benefits of a computationally efficient model.
|
|---|