Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry

Background Little is known about the prognostic implications of frailty, a state of susceptibility to stressors and poor recovery to homeostasis in older people, after myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and Results We studied 3944 MI patients aged ≥65 years treated at 41 Australian hospitals from 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashish Patel, Shaun G. Goodman, Andrew T. Yan, Karen P. Alexander, Camilla L. Wong, Asim N. Cheema, Jacob A. Udell, Padma Kaul, Mario D'Souza, Karice Hyun, Mark Adams, James Weaver, Derek P. Chew, David Brieger, Akshay Bagai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009859
_version_ 1811334179228483584
author Ashish Patel
Shaun G. Goodman
Andrew T. Yan
Karen P. Alexander
Camilla L. Wong
Asim N. Cheema
Jacob A. Udell
Padma Kaul
Mario D'Souza
Karice Hyun
Mark Adams
James Weaver
Derek P. Chew
David Brieger
Akshay Bagai
author_facet Ashish Patel
Shaun G. Goodman
Andrew T. Yan
Karen P. Alexander
Camilla L. Wong
Asim N. Cheema
Jacob A. Udell
Padma Kaul
Mario D'Souza
Karice Hyun
Mark Adams
James Weaver
Derek P. Chew
David Brieger
Akshay Bagai
author_sort Ashish Patel
collection DOAJ
description Background Little is known about the prognostic implications of frailty, a state of susceptibility to stressors and poor recovery to homeostasis in older people, after myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and Results We studied 3944 MI patients aged ≥65 years treated at 41 Australian hospitals from 2009 to 2016 in the CONCORDANCE (Australian Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events) registry. Frailty index (FI) was determined using the health deficit accumulation method. All‐cause and cardiac‐specific mortality at 6 months were compared between frail (FI >0.25) and nonfrail (FI ≤0.25) patients. Among 1275 patients with ST‐segment–elevation MI (STEMI), 192 (15%) were frail, and among 2669 non‐STEMI (NSTEMI) patients, 902 (34%) were frail. Compared with nonfrail counterparts, frail STEMI patients received 30% less reperfusion therapy and 22% less revascularization during index hospitalization; frail NSTEMI patients received 30% less diagnostic angiography and 39% less revascularization. Unadjusted 6‐month all‐cause mortality (STEMI: 13% versus 3%; NSTEMI: 13% versus 4%) and cardiac‐specific mortality (STEMI: 6% versus 1.4%, NSTEMI: 3.2% versus 1.2%) were higher among frail patients. After adjustment for known prognosticators, FI was significantly associated with higher 6‐month all‐cause (STEMI: odds ratio: 1.74 per 0.1 FI [95% confidence interval, 1.37–2.22], P<0.001; NSTEMI: odds ratio: 1.62 per 0.1 FI [95% confidence interval, 1.40–1.87], P<0.001) but not cardiac‐specific mortality (STEMI: P=0.99; NSTEMI: P=0.93). Conclusions Frail patients receive lower rates of invasive cardiac care during MI hospitalization. Increased frailty was independently associated with increased postdischarge all‐cause mortality but not cardiac‐specific mortality. These findings inform identification of frailty during MI hospitalization as a potential opportunity to address competing risks for mortality in this high‐risk population.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:03:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2570ad5ef8984b32b3de06e2172356d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:03:58Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-2570ad5ef8984b32b3de06e2172356d32022-12-22T02:38:32ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802018-09-0171810.1161/JAHA.118.009859Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE RegistryAshish Patel0Shaun G. Goodman1Andrew T. Yan2Karen P. Alexander3Camilla L. Wong4Asim N. Cheema5Jacob A. Udell6Padma Kaul7Mario D'Souza8Karice Hyun9Mark Adams10James Weaver11Derek P. Chew12David Brieger13Akshay Bagai14Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre St Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario CanadaTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre St Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario CanadaTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre St Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario CanadaDuke Clinical Research Institute Durham NCUniversity of Toronto Ontario CanadaTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre St Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario CanadaUniversity of Toronto Ontario CanadaCanadian VIGOUR Centre University of Alberta Edmonton CanadaSchool of Public Health University of Sydney Clinical Research Centre Sydney Local Health District Sydney AustraliaANZAC Institute Westmead Clinical School Sydney Medical School University of Sydney AustraliaDepartment of Cardiology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney AustraliaUniversity of New South Wales Sydney AustraliaDepartment of Cardiology Flinders University Adelaide AustraliaDepartment of Cardiology Concord Hospital University of Sydney Sydney AustraliaTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre St Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario CanadaBackground Little is known about the prognostic implications of frailty, a state of susceptibility to stressors and poor recovery to homeostasis in older people, after myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and Results We studied 3944 MI patients aged ≥65 years treated at 41 Australian hospitals from 2009 to 2016 in the CONCORDANCE (Australian Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events) registry. Frailty index (FI) was determined using the health deficit accumulation method. All‐cause and cardiac‐specific mortality at 6 months were compared between frail (FI >0.25) and nonfrail (FI ≤0.25) patients. Among 1275 patients with ST‐segment–elevation MI (STEMI), 192 (15%) were frail, and among 2669 non‐STEMI (NSTEMI) patients, 902 (34%) were frail. Compared with nonfrail counterparts, frail STEMI patients received 30% less reperfusion therapy and 22% less revascularization during index hospitalization; frail NSTEMI patients received 30% less diagnostic angiography and 39% less revascularization. Unadjusted 6‐month all‐cause mortality (STEMI: 13% versus 3%; NSTEMI: 13% versus 4%) and cardiac‐specific mortality (STEMI: 6% versus 1.4%, NSTEMI: 3.2% versus 1.2%) were higher among frail patients. After adjustment for known prognosticators, FI was significantly associated with higher 6‐month all‐cause (STEMI: odds ratio: 1.74 per 0.1 FI [95% confidence interval, 1.37–2.22], P<0.001; NSTEMI: odds ratio: 1.62 per 0.1 FI [95% confidence interval, 1.40–1.87], P<0.001) but not cardiac‐specific mortality (STEMI: P=0.99; NSTEMI: P=0.93). Conclusions Frail patients receive lower rates of invasive cardiac care during MI hospitalization. Increased frailty was independently associated with increased postdischarge all‐cause mortality but not cardiac‐specific mortality. These findings inform identification of frailty during MI hospitalization as a potential opportunity to address competing risks for mortality in this high‐risk population.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009859frailtyhealth services researchmyocardial infarctionoutcomes
spellingShingle Ashish Patel
Shaun G. Goodman
Andrew T. Yan
Karen P. Alexander
Camilla L. Wong
Asim N. Cheema
Jacob A. Udell
Padma Kaul
Mario D'Souza
Karice Hyun
Mark Adams
James Weaver
Derek P. Chew
David Brieger
Akshay Bagai
Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
frailty
health services research
myocardial infarction
outcomes
title Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
title_full Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
title_fullStr Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
title_full_unstemmed Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
title_short Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
title_sort frailty and outcomes after myocardial infarction insights from the concordance registry
topic frailty
health services research
myocardial infarction
outcomes
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009859
work_keys_str_mv AT ashishpatel frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT shaunggoodman frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT andrewtyan frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT karenpalexander frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT camillalwong frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT asimncheema frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT jacobaudell frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT padmakaul frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT mariodsouza frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT karicehyun frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT markadams frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT jamesweaver frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT derekpchew frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT davidbrieger frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry
AT akshaybagai frailtyandoutcomesaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromtheconcordanceregistry