Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations

Optimum road spacing (ORS) of forwarding operation in Styria in Southern Austria is studied in this paper. In a harvesting operation it is important to compute the ORS to minimize the total cost of harvesting and roading. The aim of this study was a comparison of different methods to study ORS. Data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. R. Ghaffarian, K. Stampfer, J. Sessions
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2009-09-01
Series:Journal of Forest Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/jfs-200909-0004_comparison-of-three-methods-to-determine-optimal-road-spacing-for-forwarder-type-logging-operations.php
_version_ 1797898827550687232
author M. R. Ghaffarian
K. Stampfer
J. Sessions
author_facet M. R. Ghaffarian
K. Stampfer
J. Sessions
author_sort M. R. Ghaffarian
collection DOAJ
description Optimum road spacing (ORS) of forwarding operation in Styria in Southern Austria is studied in this paper. In a harvesting operation it is important to compute the ORS to minimize the total cost of harvesting and roading. The aim of this study was a comparison of different methods to study ORS. Data from 82 cycles were used to develop two models for predicting the cycle time using statistical analysis of a time study data base. The ORS was computed by three methods including Matthews' formula (1942), Sundberg's method (1976), and the two statistical models for predicting the cycle time. The results gave the ORS for one-way forwarding using Matthew's formula as 1,969 m, Sund-berg's model as 394.4 m, and the two time study models as 463 and 909 m. The analysis of forwarding data indicated that the speed was related to a distance which contributed to the difference between models and that the loading and unloading time may be related to one or several other study variables.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:20:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2571403724fb4af28a084dbcd5fbebda
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1212-4834
1805-935X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:20:17Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Forest Science
spelling doaj.art-2571403724fb4af28a084dbcd5fbebda2023-02-23T03:42:04ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesJournal of Forest Science1212-48341805-935X2009-09-0155942343110.17221/79/2008-JFSjfs-200909-0004Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operationsM. R. Ghaffarian0K. Stampfer1J. Sessions2Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Forest Engineering, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USAOptimum road spacing (ORS) of forwarding operation in Styria in Southern Austria is studied in this paper. In a harvesting operation it is important to compute the ORS to minimize the total cost of harvesting and roading. The aim of this study was a comparison of different methods to study ORS. Data from 82 cycles were used to develop two models for predicting the cycle time using statistical analysis of a time study data base. The ORS was computed by three methods including Matthews' formula (1942), Sundberg's method (1976), and the two statistical models for predicting the cycle time. The results gave the ORS for one-way forwarding using Matthew's formula as 1,969 m, Sund-berg's model as 394.4 m, and the two time study models as 463 and 909 m. The analysis of forwarding data indicated that the speed was related to a distance which contributed to the difference between models and that the loading and unloading time may be related to one or several other study variables.https://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/jfs-200909-0004_comparison-of-three-methods-to-determine-optimal-road-spacing-for-forwarder-type-logging-operations.phpforwardingproductioncosttravelling modeloptimum road spacing
spellingShingle M. R. Ghaffarian
K. Stampfer
J. Sessions
Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations
Journal of Forest Science
forwarding
production
cost
travelling model
optimum road spacing
title Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations
title_full Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations
title_fullStr Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations
title_short Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations
title_sort comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder type logging operations
topic forwarding
production
cost
travelling model
optimum road spacing
url https://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/jfs-200909-0004_comparison-of-three-methods-to-determine-optimal-road-spacing-for-forwarder-type-logging-operations.php
work_keys_str_mv AT mrghaffarian comparisonofthreemethodstodetermineoptimalroadspacingforforwardertypeloggingoperations
AT kstampfer comparisonofthreemethodstodetermineoptimalroadspacingforforwardertypeloggingoperations
AT jsessions comparisonofthreemethodstodetermineoptimalroadspacingforforwardertypeloggingoperations