Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation
Abstract The junction of bioelectrochemical systems and synthetic biology opens the door to many potentially groundbreaking technologies. When developing these possibilities, choosing the correct chassis organism can save a great deal of engineering effort and, indeed, can mean the difference betwee...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Microbial Biotechnology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14170 |
_version_ | 1828005654655139840 |
---|---|
author | Lina J. Bird Rebecca L. Mickol Brian J. Eddie Meghna Thakur Matthew D. Yates Sarah M. Glaven |
author_facet | Lina J. Bird Rebecca L. Mickol Brian J. Eddie Meghna Thakur Matthew D. Yates Sarah M. Glaven |
author_sort | Lina J. Bird |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract The junction of bioelectrochemical systems and synthetic biology opens the door to many potentially groundbreaking technologies. When developing these possibilities, choosing the correct chassis organism can save a great deal of engineering effort and, indeed, can mean the difference between success and failure. Choosing the correct chassis for a specific application requires a knowledge of the metabolic potential of the candidate organisms, as well as a clear delineation of the traits, required in the application. In this review, we will explore the metabolic and electrochemical potential of a single genus, Marinobacter. We will cover its strengths, (salt tolerance, biofilm formation and electrochemical potential) and weaknesses (insufficient characterization of many strains and a less developed toolbox for genetic manipulation) in potential synthetic electromicrobiology applications. In doing so, we will provide a roadmap for choosing a chassis organism for bioelectrochemical systems. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:38:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2572ea4ab0f14271a19ce3c38a117a6c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1751-7915 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:38:35Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Microbial Biotechnology |
spelling | doaj.art-2572ea4ab0f14271a19ce3c38a117a6c2023-02-23T12:11:04ZengWileyMicrobial Biotechnology1751-79152023-03-0116349450610.1111/1751-7915.14170Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluationLina J. Bird0Rebecca L. Mickol1Brian J. Eddie2Meghna Thakur3Matthew D. Yates4Sarah M. Glaven5Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory Washington District of Columbia USACenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory Washington District of Columbia USACenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory Washington District of Columbia USACenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory Washington District of Columbia USACenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory Washington District of Columbia USACenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory Washington District of Columbia USAAbstract The junction of bioelectrochemical systems and synthetic biology opens the door to many potentially groundbreaking technologies. When developing these possibilities, choosing the correct chassis organism can save a great deal of engineering effort and, indeed, can mean the difference between success and failure. Choosing the correct chassis for a specific application requires a knowledge of the metabolic potential of the candidate organisms, as well as a clear delineation of the traits, required in the application. In this review, we will explore the metabolic and electrochemical potential of a single genus, Marinobacter. We will cover its strengths, (salt tolerance, biofilm formation and electrochemical potential) and weaknesses (insufficient characterization of many strains and a less developed toolbox for genetic manipulation) in potential synthetic electromicrobiology applications. In doing so, we will provide a roadmap for choosing a chassis organism for bioelectrochemical systems.https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14170 |
spellingShingle | Lina J. Bird Rebecca L. Mickol Brian J. Eddie Meghna Thakur Matthew D. Yates Sarah M. Glaven Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation Microbial Biotechnology |
title | Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation |
title_full | Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation |
title_fullStr | Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation |
title_short | Marinobacter: A case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation |
title_sort | marinobacter a case study in bioelectrochemical chassis evaluation |
url | https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linajbird marinobacteracasestudyinbioelectrochemicalchassisevaluation AT rebeccalmickol marinobacteracasestudyinbioelectrochemicalchassisevaluation AT brianjeddie marinobacteracasestudyinbioelectrochemicalchassisevaluation AT meghnathakur marinobacteracasestudyinbioelectrochemicalchassisevaluation AT matthewdyates marinobacteracasestudyinbioelectrochemicalchassisevaluation AT sarahmglaven marinobacteracasestudyinbioelectrochemicalchassisevaluation |