The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)

Freshwater mussels, Unionoida, are endangered across the globe due to recruitment failure. In the present study, with general linear mixed models, we investigated the relative effects of biotic (host fish density) and abiotic (water depth, fine sediment, water temperature, and water quality) factors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keita Kawajiri, Nobuo Ishiyama, Kazuki Miura, Akira Terui, Masanao Sueyoshi, Futoshi Nakamura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/9/1289
_version_ 1797535343225864192
author Keita Kawajiri
Nobuo Ishiyama
Kazuki Miura
Akira Terui
Masanao Sueyoshi
Futoshi Nakamura
author_facet Keita Kawajiri
Nobuo Ishiyama
Kazuki Miura
Akira Terui
Masanao Sueyoshi
Futoshi Nakamura
author_sort Keita Kawajiri
collection DOAJ
description Freshwater mussels, Unionoida, are endangered across the globe due to recruitment failure. In the present study, with general linear mixed models, we investigated the relative effects of biotic (host fish density) and abiotic (water depth, fine sediment, water temperature, and water quality) factors on the recruitment of <i>Margaritifera laevis</i> in 10 streams of Hokkaido, northern Japan. We additionally examined the factors regulating the density of the host fish <i>Oncorhynchus masou</i> <i>masou</i> with general linear models. The proportion of juvenile mussels had a unimodal relationship with the host density, which was the most influential factor among the others examined. The positive relationship between mussel recruitment and host density can be attributed to an increased host fish infection rate. The negative correlation between mussel recruitment and host density at high fish densities may be due to reduced larval growth on host fish that are in poor physical condition. We also found that host fish density was negatively affected by nutrient enrichment. Our results suggest that mitigating water quality degradation to recover host fish density should be prioritized to improve mussel recruitment. Although stock enhancement is effective for increasing the salmon population density, excess stocking can further disturb mussel recruitment.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:43:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-257e74cad5564a86bdac7eb545b8cfaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:43:07Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-257e74cad5564a86bdac7eb545b8cfaa2023-11-21T18:17:42ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412021-05-01139128910.3390/w13091289The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)Keita Kawajiri0Nobuo Ishiyama1Kazuki Miura2Akira Terui3Masanao Sueyoshi4Futoshi Nakamura5Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, N9W9 Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, JapanGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, N9W9 Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, JapanShiretoko Museum, Honmachi 49, Shari, Shari-gun, Hokkaido 099-4113, JapanGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, N9W9 Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, JapanAqua Restoration Research Center, Public Works Research Institute, Kawashima Kasada-machi, Kakamigahara, Gifu 501-6021, JapanGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, N9W9 Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, JapanFreshwater mussels, Unionoida, are endangered across the globe due to recruitment failure. In the present study, with general linear mixed models, we investigated the relative effects of biotic (host fish density) and abiotic (water depth, fine sediment, water temperature, and water quality) factors on the recruitment of <i>Margaritifera laevis</i> in 10 streams of Hokkaido, northern Japan. We additionally examined the factors regulating the density of the host fish <i>Oncorhynchus masou</i> <i>masou</i> with general linear models. The proportion of juvenile mussels had a unimodal relationship with the host density, which was the most influential factor among the others examined. The positive relationship between mussel recruitment and host density can be attributed to an increased host fish infection rate. The negative correlation between mussel recruitment and host density at high fish densities may be due to reduced larval growth on host fish that are in poor physical condition. We also found that host fish density was negatively affected by nutrient enrichment. Our results suggest that mitigating water quality degradation to recover host fish density should be prioritized to improve mussel recruitment. Although stock enhancement is effective for increasing the salmon population density, excess stocking can further disturb mussel recruitment.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/9/1289conservation measurehost fish densitypopulation declineagricultural land useUnionoida<i>Oncorhynchus masou masou</i>
spellingShingle Keita Kawajiri
Nobuo Ishiyama
Kazuki Miura
Akira Terui
Masanao Sueyoshi
Futoshi Nakamura
The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)
Water
conservation measure
host fish density
population decline
agricultural land use
Unionoida
<i>Oncorhynchus masou masou</i>
title The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)
title_full The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)
title_fullStr The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)
title_full_unstemmed The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)
title_short The Relative Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Recruitment of Freshwater Mussels (<i>Margaritifera laevis</i>)
title_sort relative effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the recruitment of freshwater mussels i margaritifera laevis i
topic conservation measure
host fish density
population decline
agricultural land use
Unionoida
<i>Oncorhynchus masou masou</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/9/1289
work_keys_str_mv AT keitakawajiri therelativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT nobuoishiyama therelativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT kazukimiura therelativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT akiraterui therelativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT masanaosueyoshi therelativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT futoshinakamura therelativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT keitakawajiri relativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT nobuoishiyama relativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT kazukimiura relativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT akiraterui relativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT masanaosueyoshi relativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi
AT futoshinakamura relativeeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsontherecruitmentoffreshwatermusselsimargaritiferalaevisi