Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study

Abstract Background Glaucoma drainage implant exposure is one of the serious complications after glaucoma drainage implant surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for exposure of the device after implantation of a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Methods This is a retr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayaka Edo, Koji Jian, Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01632-5
_version_ 1811191863236886528
author Ayaka Edo
Koji Jian
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
author_facet Ayaka Edo
Koji Jian
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
author_sort Ayaka Edo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Glaucoma drainage implant exposure is one of the serious complications after glaucoma drainage implant surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for exposure of the device after implantation of a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Methods This is a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant surgery at the Hiroshima University Hospital between April 1, 2012 and October 31, 2016, and who were followed for at least 6 months after surgery. We examined the risk factors for implant exposure based on data obtained from the medical records, with a particular focus on the differences in implant models. Results A total of 80 eyes from 80 patients were identified; all patients were Japanese. In this study, the rate of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant exposure was 15.0% (12 of 80 eyes). The exposure rate for the BG 102-350 tended to be higher than that for the BG 101-350 and BG 103-250 (p = 0.092; adjusted odds ratio = 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–13.58). In the patients who had diabetic mellitus, the BG 102-350 showed a significant risk of implant exposure (p = 0.038; adjusted odds ratio = 15.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–202.59). Conclusions In Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant surgery in patients with diabetes, using the BG 102-350 was associated with greater risk of implant exposure compared with using the BG 101-350 or BG 103-250.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:44:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-258085f1de924164ab813b50b793d69d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:44:09Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-258085f1de924164ab813b50b793d69d2022-12-22T03:56:42ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152020-09-012011710.1186/s12886-020-01632-5Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control studyAyaka Edo0Koji Jian1Yoshiaki Kiuchi2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima UniversityAbstract Background Glaucoma drainage implant exposure is one of the serious complications after glaucoma drainage implant surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for exposure of the device after implantation of a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Methods This is a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant surgery at the Hiroshima University Hospital between April 1, 2012 and October 31, 2016, and who were followed for at least 6 months after surgery. We examined the risk factors for implant exposure based on data obtained from the medical records, with a particular focus on the differences in implant models. Results A total of 80 eyes from 80 patients were identified; all patients were Japanese. In this study, the rate of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant exposure was 15.0% (12 of 80 eyes). The exposure rate for the BG 102-350 tended to be higher than that for the BG 101-350 and BG 103-250 (p = 0.092; adjusted odds ratio = 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–13.58). In the patients who had diabetic mellitus, the BG 102-350 showed a significant risk of implant exposure (p = 0.038; adjusted odds ratio = 15.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–202.59). Conclusions In Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant surgery in patients with diabetes, using the BG 102-350 was associated with greater risk of implant exposure compared with using the BG 101-350 or BG 103-250.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01632-5Glaucoma drainage device exposureBaerveldt glaucoma drainage implantRisk factorImplant model
spellingShingle Ayaka Edo
Koji Jian
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study
BMC Ophthalmology
Glaucoma drainage device exposure
Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant
Risk factor
Implant model
title Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study
title_full Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study
title_fullStr Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study
title_short Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study
title_sort risk factors for exposure of baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants a case control study
topic Glaucoma drainage device exposure
Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant
Risk factor
Implant model
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01632-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ayakaedo riskfactorsforexposureofbaerveldtglaucomadrainageimplantsacasecontrolstudy
AT kojijian riskfactorsforexposureofbaerveldtglaucomadrainageimplantsacasecontrolstudy
AT yoshiakikiuchi riskfactorsforexposureofbaerveldtglaucomadrainageimplantsacasecontrolstudy