Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning

Abstract Animals often display choice bias, or a preference for one option over the others, which can significantly impede learning new tasks. Delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks with two-alternative choices of lickports on the left and right have been widely used to study sensory processing, workin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jongrok Do, Min Whan Jung, Doyun Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-12-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49862-z
_version_ 1797377028315414528
author Jongrok Do
Min Whan Jung
Doyun Lee
author_facet Jongrok Do
Min Whan Jung
Doyun Lee
author_sort Jongrok Do
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Animals often display choice bias, or a preference for one option over the others, which can significantly impede learning new tasks. Delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks with two-alternative choices of lickports on the left and right have been widely used to study sensory processing, working memory, and associative memory in head-fixed animals. However, extensive training time, primarily due to the animals' biased licking responses, limits their practical utility. Here, we present the implementation of an automated side bias correction system in an olfactory DMS task, where the lickport positions and the ratio of left- and right-rewarded trials are dynamically adjusted to counterbalance mouse’s biased licking responses during training. The correction algorithm moves the preferred lickport farther away from the mouse’s mouth and the non-preferred lickport closer, while also increasing the proportion of non-preferred side trials when biased licking occurs. We found that adjusting lickport distances and the proportions of left- versus right-rewarded trials effectively reduces the mouse’s side bias. Further analyses reveal that these adjustments also correlate with subsequent improvements in behavioral performance. Our findings suggest that the automated side bias correction system is a valuable tool for enhancing the applicability of behavioral tasks involving two-alternative lickport choices.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:47:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2580d9284da045a5bd98a571b18e3026
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:47:07Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-2580d9284da045a5bd98a571b18e30262023-12-24T12:16:38ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-12-0113111510.1038/s41598-023-49862-zAutomating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learningJongrok Do0Min Whan Jung1Doyun Lee2Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyCenter for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic ScienceAbstract Animals often display choice bias, or a preference for one option over the others, which can significantly impede learning new tasks. Delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks with two-alternative choices of lickports on the left and right have been widely used to study sensory processing, working memory, and associative memory in head-fixed animals. However, extensive training time, primarily due to the animals' biased licking responses, limits their practical utility. Here, we present the implementation of an automated side bias correction system in an olfactory DMS task, where the lickport positions and the ratio of left- and right-rewarded trials are dynamically adjusted to counterbalance mouse’s biased licking responses during training. The correction algorithm moves the preferred lickport farther away from the mouse’s mouth and the non-preferred lickport closer, while also increasing the proportion of non-preferred side trials when biased licking occurs. We found that adjusting lickport distances and the proportions of left- versus right-rewarded trials effectively reduces the mouse’s side bias. Further analyses reveal that these adjustments also correlate with subsequent improvements in behavioral performance. Our findings suggest that the automated side bias correction system is a valuable tool for enhancing the applicability of behavioral tasks involving two-alternative lickport choices.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49862-z
spellingShingle Jongrok Do
Min Whan Jung
Doyun Lee
Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
Scientific Reports
title Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
title_full Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
title_fullStr Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
title_full_unstemmed Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
title_short Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
title_sort automating licking bias correction in a two choice delayed match to sample task to accelerate learning
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49862-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jongrokdo automatinglickingbiascorrectioninatwochoicedelayedmatchtosampletasktoacceleratelearning
AT minwhanjung automatinglickingbiascorrectioninatwochoicedelayedmatchtosampletasktoacceleratelearning
AT doyunlee automatinglickingbiascorrectioninatwochoicedelayedmatchtosampletasktoacceleratelearning