Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!

Background: After attending professional evaluation conferences, and having the privilege of listening to the founders of the discipline of Evaluation, the author reflects on how the new generation of evaluators should aspire to upgrade their role in society by making the most of the tools and soci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sara Vaca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University 2015-03-01
Series:Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/420
_version_ 1797812643403137024
author Sara Vaca
author_facet Sara Vaca
author_sort Sara Vaca
collection DOAJ
description Background: After attending professional evaluation conferences, and having the privilege of listening to the founders of the discipline of Evaluation, the author reflects on how the new generation of evaluators should aspire to upgrade their role in society by making the most of the tools and social dynamics of new technologies, and exploring ways in which evaluation could operate in both present and future scenarios. Purpose: To foster democratic evaluation as a powerful tool for more democratic government, by expanding traditional ways of reaching the community, either as evaluation participants or traditional funders, leveraged through new technologies. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Not applicable. Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.   Findings: There are powerful potential synergies that the evaluation community could explore between participatory evaluation approaches –such as democratic evaluation– and the democratization (democratic: for all those individuals who have internet access) of participation facilitated by new technologies –in terms of voting, giving opinion, donating or contributing in some way via internet. . One of these possibilities is known as Crowdsourcing: asking services, ideas, or content to a large group of people, and especially from an online community. This alternative has started to be used in many disciplines. In particular, two crowdsourcing modalities have been found to be directly applicable: -        Crowdvoting: asking the public's opinion regarding certain matters, not only in the data collection phase of the evaluation, but in the phases of analysis and judging, or even in the evaluation design, as a way of introducing other voices into the evaluation process. -        Crowdfunding: asking citizens to contribute with small amounts of money to support the evaluation of public services and programmes, as an alternative to depending solely on the funding decisions of traditional decision-makers. This can be very pertinent in cases where decision-makers are not following the general interest and democratic evaluation appears to be the best approach to follow for citizens to try to induce a change of policy. However, further research is needed to explore these and other modalities and synergies, with special emphasis on experimentation to test such hypotheses.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:41:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25847b3cbebc45c2982265ace793b6c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1556-8180
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:41:28Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
record_format Article
series Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
spelling doaj.art-25847b3cbebc45c2982265ace793b6c72023-06-03T07:02:40ZengThe Evaluation Center at Western Michigan UniversityJournal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation1556-81802015-03-01112410.56645/jmde.v11i24.420Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!Sara Vaca Background: After attending professional evaluation conferences, and having the privilege of listening to the founders of the discipline of Evaluation, the author reflects on how the new generation of evaluators should aspire to upgrade their role in society by making the most of the tools and social dynamics of new technologies, and exploring ways in which evaluation could operate in both present and future scenarios. Purpose: To foster democratic evaluation as a powerful tool for more democratic government, by expanding traditional ways of reaching the community, either as evaluation participants or traditional funders, leveraged through new technologies. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Not applicable. Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.   Findings: There are powerful potential synergies that the evaluation community could explore between participatory evaluation approaches –such as democratic evaluation– and the democratization (democratic: for all those individuals who have internet access) of participation facilitated by new technologies –in terms of voting, giving opinion, donating or contributing in some way via internet. . One of these possibilities is known as Crowdsourcing: asking services, ideas, or content to a large group of people, and especially from an online community. This alternative has started to be used in many disciplines. In particular, two crowdsourcing modalities have been found to be directly applicable: -        Crowdvoting: asking the public's opinion regarding certain matters, not only in the data collection phase of the evaluation, but in the phases of analysis and judging, or even in the evaluation design, as a way of introducing other voices into the evaluation process. -        Crowdfunding: asking citizens to contribute with small amounts of money to support the evaluation of public services and programmes, as an alternative to depending solely on the funding decisions of traditional decision-makers. This can be very pertinent in cases where decision-makers are not following the general interest and democratic evaluation appears to be the best approach to follow for citizens to try to induce a change of policy. However, further research is needed to explore these and other modalities and synergies, with special emphasis on experimentation to test such hypotheses. https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/420
spellingShingle Sara Vaca
Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
title Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!
title_full Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!
title_fullStr Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!
title_full_unstemmed Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!
title_short Democratic Evaluation & Crowdsourcing: It's a Match!
title_sort democratic evaluation crowdsourcing it s a match
url https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/420
work_keys_str_mv AT saravaca democraticevaluationcrowdsourcingitsamatch