Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients

Objective: To identify potential predictors for invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzes data of 516 patients with confirmed COVID-19, who were categorized into three groups based on which mechanica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Li, Fengyu Lin, Minhui Dai, Lingli Chen, Duoduo Han, Yanhui Cui, Pinhua Pan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1753466620963017
_version_ 1828543444919779328
author Wen Li
Fengyu Lin
Minhui Dai
Lingli Chen
Duoduo Han
Yanhui Cui
Pinhua Pan
author_facet Wen Li
Fengyu Lin
Minhui Dai
Lingli Chen
Duoduo Han
Yanhui Cui
Pinhua Pan
author_sort Wen Li
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To identify potential predictors for invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzes data of 516 patients with confirmed COVID-19, who were categorized into three groups based on which mechanical ventilation method was used during the hospitalization period. Results: Among 516 confirmed cases with COVID-19, 446 patients did not receive mechanical ventilation, 38 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and 32 received non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV). The median age of the included patients was 61 years old (interquartile range, 52–69). A total of 432 patients had one or more coexisting illnesses. The main clinical symptoms included fever (79.46%), dry cough (66.47%) and shortness of breath (46.90%). IMV and NIMV patients included more men, more coexisting illnesses and received more medication. Patients in the IMV group and NIMV had higher leukocyte and neutrophil count, lower lymphocyte count, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and D-dimer levels and lower albumin (ALB) level. The univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and LDH had a predictive role as indicators for IMV, and the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and PCT had a predictive role as indicators for NIMV. The area under the curve (AUC) of use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and LDH was 0.885 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.838–0.933, p  < 0.0001), which provided the specificity and sensitivity 77.7% and 90.9%, respectively. AUC of the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and PCT for NIMV was 0.888 (95% CI 0.825–0.952, p  < 0.0001), which provided the specificity and sensitivity 70.3% and 96.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil and LDH were predictive indicators for IMV, whereas glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil and PCT were predictive indicators for NIMV. In addition, the above-mentioned mediators had the most predictive meaning for mechanical ventilation when combined. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:14:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2590242e60154b9498394954453af596
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1753-4666
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:14:03Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
spelling doaj.art-2590242e60154b9498394954453af5962022-12-22T00:41:50ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease1753-46662020-10-011410.1177/1753466620963017Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patientsWen LiFengyu LinMinhui DaiLingli ChenDuoduo HanYanhui CuiPinhua PanObjective: To identify potential predictors for invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzes data of 516 patients with confirmed COVID-19, who were categorized into three groups based on which mechanical ventilation method was used during the hospitalization period. Results: Among 516 confirmed cases with COVID-19, 446 patients did not receive mechanical ventilation, 38 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and 32 received non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV). The median age of the included patients was 61 years old (interquartile range, 52–69). A total of 432 patients had one or more coexisting illnesses. The main clinical symptoms included fever (79.46%), dry cough (66.47%) and shortness of breath (46.90%). IMV and NIMV patients included more men, more coexisting illnesses and received more medication. Patients in the IMV group and NIMV had higher leukocyte and neutrophil count, lower lymphocyte count, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and D-dimer levels and lower albumin (ALB) level. The univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and LDH had a predictive role as indicators for IMV, and the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and PCT had a predictive role as indicators for NIMV. The area under the curve (AUC) of use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and LDH was 0.885 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.838–0.933, p  < 0.0001), which provided the specificity and sensitivity 77.7% and 90.9%, respectively. AUC of the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and PCT for NIMV was 0.888 (95% CI 0.825–0.952, p  < 0.0001), which provided the specificity and sensitivity 70.3% and 96.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil and LDH were predictive indicators for IMV, whereas glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil and PCT were predictive indicators for NIMV. In addition, the above-mentioned mediators had the most predictive meaning for mechanical ventilation when combined. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.https://doi.org/10.1177/1753466620963017
spellingShingle Wen Li
Fengyu Lin
Minhui Dai
Lingli Chen
Duoduo Han
Yanhui Cui
Pinhua Pan
Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
title Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients
title_full Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients
title_fullStr Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients
title_full_unstemmed Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients
title_short Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients
title_sort early predictors for mechanical ventilation in covid 19 patients
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1753466620963017
work_keys_str_mv AT wenli earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients
AT fengyulin earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients
AT minhuidai earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients
AT linglichen earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients
AT duoduohan earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients
AT yanhuicui earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients
AT pinhuapan earlypredictorsformechanicalventilationincovid19patients