Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil

Abstract Purpose To compare 6 methods for intraoperative pupil dilatation in eyes with insufficient pupil size during phacoemulsification. Methods This was a prospective case–control study. 99 microcoria cataract patients (120 eyes) were collected and were divided into 6 groups(20 eyes each group),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin Da Wang, Jing Shang Zhang, Meng Li, Ying Yan Mao, Yusufu Mayinuer, Xiu Hua Wan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-04-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02402-1
_version_ 1818060490357604352
author Jin Da Wang
Jing Shang Zhang
Meng Li
Ying Yan Mao
Yusufu Mayinuer
Xiu Hua Wan
author_facet Jin Da Wang
Jing Shang Zhang
Meng Li
Ying Yan Mao
Yusufu Mayinuer
Xiu Hua Wan
author_sort Jin Da Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To compare 6 methods for intraoperative pupil dilatation in eyes with insufficient pupil size during phacoemulsification. Methods This was a prospective case–control study. 99 microcoria cataract patients (120 eyes) were collected and were divided into 6 groups(20 eyes each group), and their pupils were dilated by bimanual stretching pupil (group I), pupil radial cut open(group II), mechanical pupil dilatation with iris-retractor hooks (group III), OASIS iris expander (group IV), and Malyguin-ring (Microsurgical company, America) (group V), B-HEX Pupil Expander (Med Invent Devics, India)(group VI),respectively. 3.0 mm clear corneal incision were used in phacoemulsification. All cases were followed up at 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months after the surgery. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP), corneal endothelium cell density(ECD), pupil diameter(PD) of before and after surgery were compared. Results One same doctor finished all cataract surgeries successfully. The eyes’ condition before surgery and at 6 months after surgery were compared. There were no significant statistical differences for the conditions of the eyes before surgery among six groups. The ECDs were better at 6 months postoperatively in group III and V, median values: 2114/mm2, 1961/mm2. PD was largest in group II (median value: 5.5 mm), which was significantly larger than other groups (Padjusted < 0.05). Conclusions All 6 methods used in this study were effective for the mechanical dilatation of small pupils and didn’t affect the postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure in microcoria cataract phacoemulsification. Iris-retractor hooks and the Malyugin Ring can reduce intraoperative corneal endothelium cell loss. Postoperative PD is larger when the iris was cut open radially.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:33:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2590683647504866906872505e21f6ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:33:15Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-2590683647504866906872505e21f6ef2022-12-22T01:46:53ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152022-04-012211610.1186/s12886-022-02402-1Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupilJin Da Wang0Jing Shang Zhang1Meng Li2Ying Yan Mao3Yusufu Mayinuer4Xiu Hua Wan5Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesAbstract Purpose To compare 6 methods for intraoperative pupil dilatation in eyes with insufficient pupil size during phacoemulsification. Methods This was a prospective case–control study. 99 microcoria cataract patients (120 eyes) were collected and were divided into 6 groups(20 eyes each group), and their pupils were dilated by bimanual stretching pupil (group I), pupil radial cut open(group II), mechanical pupil dilatation with iris-retractor hooks (group III), OASIS iris expander (group IV), and Malyguin-ring (Microsurgical company, America) (group V), B-HEX Pupil Expander (Med Invent Devics, India)(group VI),respectively. 3.0 mm clear corneal incision were used in phacoemulsification. All cases were followed up at 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months after the surgery. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP), corneal endothelium cell density(ECD), pupil diameter(PD) of before and after surgery were compared. Results One same doctor finished all cataract surgeries successfully. The eyes’ condition before surgery and at 6 months after surgery were compared. There were no significant statistical differences for the conditions of the eyes before surgery among six groups. The ECDs were better at 6 months postoperatively in group III and V, median values: 2114/mm2, 1961/mm2. PD was largest in group II (median value: 5.5 mm), which was significantly larger than other groups (Padjusted < 0.05). Conclusions All 6 methods used in this study were effective for the mechanical dilatation of small pupils and didn’t affect the postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure in microcoria cataract phacoemulsification. Iris-retractor hooks and the Malyugin Ring can reduce intraoperative corneal endothelium cell loss. Postoperative PD is larger when the iris was cut open radially.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02402-1CataractPhacoemulsificationSmall pupilPupil dilatationPupil expander
spellingShingle Jin Da Wang
Jing Shang Zhang
Meng Li
Ying Yan Mao
Yusufu Mayinuer
Xiu Hua Wan
Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
BMC Ophthalmology
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Small pupil
Pupil dilatation
Pupil expander
title Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
title_full Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
title_fullStr Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
title_short Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
title_sort comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil
topic Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Small pupil
Pupil dilatation
Pupil expander
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02402-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jindawang comparisonofdifferentpupildilatationmethodsforphacoemulsificationineyeswithasmallpupil
AT jingshangzhang comparisonofdifferentpupildilatationmethodsforphacoemulsificationineyeswithasmallpupil
AT mengli comparisonofdifferentpupildilatationmethodsforphacoemulsificationineyeswithasmallpupil
AT yingyanmao comparisonofdifferentpupildilatationmethodsforphacoemulsificationineyeswithasmallpupil
AT yusufumayinuer comparisonofdifferentpupildilatationmethodsforphacoemulsificationineyeswithasmallpupil
AT xiuhuawan comparisonofdifferentpupildilatationmethodsforphacoemulsificationineyeswithasmallpupil