Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center

Background Vasoactive drugs are frequently used in combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). The aim of study was to assess physicians’ preference of vasoactive agents in acute EVB, their reasons of preference and efficacy and safet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoen Young Chuah, Ping-I Hsu, Wei-Lun Tsai, Hsien-Chung Yu, Feng-Woei Tsay, Wen-Chi Chen, Kung Hung Lin, Yeong Yeh Lee, Huay-Min Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-11-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/7913.pdf
_version_ 1827606839213162496
author Yoen Young Chuah
Ping-I Hsu
Wei-Lun Tsai
Hsien-Chung Yu
Feng-Woei Tsay
Wen-Chi Chen
Kung Hung Lin
Yeong Yeh Lee
Huay-Min Wang
author_facet Yoen Young Chuah
Ping-I Hsu
Wei-Lun Tsai
Hsien-Chung Yu
Feng-Woei Tsay
Wen-Chi Chen
Kung Hung Lin
Yeong Yeh Lee
Huay-Min Wang
author_sort Yoen Young Chuah
collection DOAJ
description Background Vasoactive drugs are frequently used in combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). The aim of study was to assess physicians’ preference of vasoactive agents in acute EVB, their reasons of preference and efficacy and safety of these short course regimens. Methods Cirrhotic patients with suspected EVB were screened (n = 352). Eligible patients were assigned based on the physician’s preference to either somatostatin (group S) or terlipressin (group T) followed by EVL. In group S, intravenous bolus (250 µg) of somatostatin followed by 250 µg/hour was continued for three days. In group T, 2 mg bolus injection of terlipressin was followed by 1 mg infusion every 6 h for three days. Results A total of 150 patients were enrolled; 41 in group S and 109 in group T. Reasons for physician preference was convenience in administration (77.1%) for group T and good safety profile (73.2%) for group S. Very early rebleeding within 49–120 h occurred in one patient in groups S and T (p = 0.469). Four patients in group S and 14 patients in group T have variceal rebleeding episodes within 6–42 d (p = 0.781). Overall treatment-related adverse effects were compatible in groups S and T (p = 0.878), but the total cost of terlipressin and somatostatin differed i.e., USD 621.32 and USD 496.43 respectively. Conclusions Terlipressin is the preferred vasoactive agent by physicians in our institution for acute EVB. Convenience in administration and safety profile are main considerations of physicians. Safety and hemostatic effects did not differ significantly between short-course somatostatin or terlipressin, although terlipressin is more expensive.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:45:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2595837fa7b44f6fb37a801fab2a5cb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:45:03Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-2595837fa7b44f6fb37a801fab2a5cb52023-12-03T10:36:29ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-11-017e791310.7717/peerj.7913Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary centerYoen Young Chuah0Ping-I Hsu1Wei-Lun Tsai2Hsien-Chung Yu3Feng-Woei Tsay4Wen-Chi Chen5Kung Hung Lin6Yeong Yeh Lee7Huay-Min Wang8Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanSchool of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MalaysiaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanBackground Vasoactive drugs are frequently used in combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). The aim of study was to assess physicians’ preference of vasoactive agents in acute EVB, their reasons of preference and efficacy and safety of these short course regimens. Methods Cirrhotic patients with suspected EVB were screened (n = 352). Eligible patients were assigned based on the physician’s preference to either somatostatin (group S) or terlipressin (group T) followed by EVL. In group S, intravenous bolus (250 µg) of somatostatin followed by 250 µg/hour was continued for three days. In group T, 2 mg bolus injection of terlipressin was followed by 1 mg infusion every 6 h for three days. Results A total of 150 patients were enrolled; 41 in group S and 109 in group T. Reasons for physician preference was convenience in administration (77.1%) for group T and good safety profile (73.2%) for group S. Very early rebleeding within 49–120 h occurred in one patient in groups S and T (p = 0.469). Four patients in group S and 14 patients in group T have variceal rebleeding episodes within 6–42 d (p = 0.781). Overall treatment-related adverse effects were compatible in groups S and T (p = 0.878), but the total cost of terlipressin and somatostatin differed i.e., USD 621.32 and USD 496.43 respectively. Conclusions Terlipressin is the preferred vasoactive agent by physicians in our institution for acute EVB. Convenience in administration and safety profile are main considerations of physicians. Safety and hemostatic effects did not differ significantly between short-course somatostatin or terlipressin, although terlipressin is more expensive.https://peerj.com/articles/7913.pdfTerlipressinSomatostatinEsophageal variceal bleedingPhysician preference
spellingShingle Yoen Young Chuah
Ping-I Hsu
Wei-Lun Tsai
Hsien-Chung Yu
Feng-Woei Tsay
Wen-Chi Chen
Kung Hung Lin
Yeong Yeh Lee
Huay-Min Wang
Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
PeerJ
Terlipressin
Somatostatin
Esophageal variceal bleeding
Physician preference
title Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
title_full Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
title_fullStr Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
title_full_unstemmed Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
title_short Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians’ preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
title_sort short term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center
topic Terlipressin
Somatostatin
Esophageal variceal bleeding
Physician preference
url https://peerj.com/articles/7913.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yoenyoungchuah shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT pingihsu shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT weiluntsai shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT hsienchungyu shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT fengwoeitsay shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT wenchichen shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT kunghunglin shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT yeongyehlee shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter
AT huayminwang shorttermvasoactiveagenttreatmentdrivenbyphysicianspreferenceinacuteesophagealvaricealbleedinginatertiarycenter