Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India

PURPOSEProton beam therapy (PBT) has been a preferred modality in pediatric malignancies requiring radiotherapy. We report our preliminary experience of treating consecutive patients younger than 25 years with image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT from the first and only center on the Indian subcont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srinivas Chilukuri, Nagarjuna Burela, Ramya Uppuluri, D. Indumathi, Sapna Nangia, Pankaj Kumar Panda, Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam, Revathi Raj, Thirumalai Raja, Rakesh Jalali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-11-01
Series:JCO Global Oncology
Online Access:https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.20.00319
_version_ 1818759773777035264
author Srinivas Chilukuri
Nagarjuna Burela
Ramya Uppuluri
D. Indumathi
Sapna Nangia
Pankaj Kumar Panda
Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam
Revathi Raj
Thirumalai Raja
Rakesh Jalali
author_facet Srinivas Chilukuri
Nagarjuna Burela
Ramya Uppuluri
D. Indumathi
Sapna Nangia
Pankaj Kumar Panda
Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam
Revathi Raj
Thirumalai Raja
Rakesh Jalali
author_sort Srinivas Chilukuri
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSEProton beam therapy (PBT) has been a preferred modality in pediatric malignancies requiring radiotherapy. We report our preliminary experience of treating consecutive patients younger than 25 years with image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT from the first and only center on the Indian subcontinent.METHODSPatients were selected for PBT on the basis of a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Patient demographic data, as well as tumor and treatment-related characteristics of the cohort, were captured. Patient and treatment-related factors and their association with acute toxicities were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses.RESULTSForty-seven patients (27 with CNS and 20 with non-CNS tumors) with a median age of 9 years (range, 2-25 years) were evaluated. Most common diagnoses were ependymoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and glioma. Seventy-seven percent of patients traveled more than 500 km, and 70% of them lived in metropolitan cities. Forty-nine percent of patients had recurrent disease at presentation, and 15% had received a previous course of radiation. The median dose delivered was 54.8 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 40.0-70.4 cobalt gray equivalents) to a median clinical target volume of 175 mL (range, 18.7-3,083.0 mL), with 34% of patients requiring concurrent chemotherapy (CCT). Acute grade 2 and grade 3 dermatitis, mucositis, and hematologic toxicity was noted in 45% and 2%, 34% and 0%, and 38% and 30% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 fatigue was noted in 26% of patients. On multivariable analysis, for CNS tumors, both CCT and craniospinal irradiation were independently associated with ≥ 2 grade hematologic toxicity, whereas among non-CNS tumors, a clinical target volume > 150 mL was associated with ≥ 2 grade fatigue, head and neck irradiation was associated with ≥ 2 grade mucositis, and CCT was associated with grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity.CONCLUSIONThis study demonstrates safe implementation of a PBT program for children and young adults on the Indian subcontinent. Image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT in judiciously selected patients is feasible and can be delivered with acceptable acute toxicities.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:48:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25985cfc9495460ca427eed610a543bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2687-8941
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:48:03Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format Article
series JCO Global Oncology
spelling doaj.art-25985cfc9495460ca427eed610a543bc2022-12-21T21:17:25ZengAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyJCO Global Oncology2687-89412020-11-0161736174510.1200/GO.20.00319Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in IndiaSrinivas Chilukuri0Nagarjuna Burela1Ramya Uppuluri2D. Indumathi3Sapna Nangia4Pankaj Kumar Panda5Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam6Revathi Raj7Thirumalai Raja8Rakesh Jalali9Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Specialty Hospital, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, IndiaPURPOSEProton beam therapy (PBT) has been a preferred modality in pediatric malignancies requiring radiotherapy. We report our preliminary experience of treating consecutive patients younger than 25 years with image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT from the first and only center on the Indian subcontinent.METHODSPatients were selected for PBT on the basis of a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Patient demographic data, as well as tumor and treatment-related characteristics of the cohort, were captured. Patient and treatment-related factors and their association with acute toxicities were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses.RESULTSForty-seven patients (27 with CNS and 20 with non-CNS tumors) with a median age of 9 years (range, 2-25 years) were evaluated. Most common diagnoses were ependymoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and glioma. Seventy-seven percent of patients traveled more than 500 km, and 70% of them lived in metropolitan cities. Forty-nine percent of patients had recurrent disease at presentation, and 15% had received a previous course of radiation. The median dose delivered was 54.8 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 40.0-70.4 cobalt gray equivalents) to a median clinical target volume of 175 mL (range, 18.7-3,083.0 mL), with 34% of patients requiring concurrent chemotherapy (CCT). Acute grade 2 and grade 3 dermatitis, mucositis, and hematologic toxicity was noted in 45% and 2%, 34% and 0%, and 38% and 30% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 fatigue was noted in 26% of patients. On multivariable analysis, for CNS tumors, both CCT and craniospinal irradiation were independently associated with ≥ 2 grade hematologic toxicity, whereas among non-CNS tumors, a clinical target volume > 150 mL was associated with ≥ 2 grade fatigue, head and neck irradiation was associated with ≥ 2 grade mucositis, and CCT was associated with grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity.CONCLUSIONThis study demonstrates safe implementation of a PBT program for children and young adults on the Indian subcontinent. Image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT in judiciously selected patients is feasible and can be delivered with acceptable acute toxicities.https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.20.00319
spellingShingle Srinivas Chilukuri
Nagarjuna Burela
Ramya Uppuluri
D. Indumathi
Sapna Nangia
Pankaj Kumar Panda
Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam
Revathi Raj
Thirumalai Raja
Rakesh Jalali
Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India
JCO Global Oncology
title Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India
title_full Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India
title_fullStr Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India
title_short Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India
title_sort preliminary experience of treating children and young adults with image guided proton beam therapy in india
url https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.20.00319
work_keys_str_mv AT srinivaschilukuri preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT nagarjunaburela preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT ramyauppuluri preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT dindumathi preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT sapnanangia preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT pankajkumarpanda preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT dayanandasharmashamurailatpam preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT revathiraj preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT thirumalairaja preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia
AT rakeshjalali preliminaryexperienceoftreatingchildrenandyoungadultswithimageguidedprotonbeamtherapyinindia