Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters

Systematic errors are present in laser scanning system observations due to manufacturer imperfections, wearing over time, vibrations, changing environmental conditions and, last but not least, involuntary hits. To achieve maximum quality and rigorous measurements from terrestrial laser scanners, a l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. L. Lerma, D. García-San-Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-05-01
Series:ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:http://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/II-5/219/2014/isprsannals-II-5-219-2014.pdf
_version_ 1818675657261973504
author J. L. Lerma
D. García-San-Miguel
author_facet J. L. Lerma
D. García-San-Miguel
author_sort J. L. Lerma
collection DOAJ
description Systematic errors are present in laser scanning system observations due to manufacturer imperfections, wearing over time, vibrations, changing environmental conditions and, last but not least, involuntary hits. To achieve maximum quality and rigorous measurements from terrestrial laser scanners, a least squares estimation of additional calibration parameters can be used to model the a priori unknown systematic errors and therefore improve output observations. The selection of the right set of additional parameters is not trivial and requires laborious statistical analysis. Based on this requirement, this article presents an approach to determine the best set of additional parameters which provides the best mathematical solution based on a dimensionless quality index. The best set of additional parameters is the one which provides the maximum quality index (i.e. minimum value) for the group of observables, exterior orientation parameters and reference points. Calibration performance is tested using both a phase shift continuous wave scanner, FARO PHOTON 880, and a pulse-based time-of-flight system, Leica HDS3000. The improvement achieved after the geometric calibration is 30% for the former and 70% for the latter.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T08:31:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-259a0938f453422aa5f25bd15793c4ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2194-9042
2194-9050
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T08:31:04Z
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
spelling doaj.art-259a0938f453422aa5f25bd15793c4ee2022-12-21T21:56:37ZengCopernicus PublicationsISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences2194-90422194-90502014-05-01II-521922610.5194/isprsannals-II-5-219-2014Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parametersJ. L. Lerma0D. García-San-Miguel1Photogrammetry & Laser Scanning Research Group (GIFLE). Department of Cartographic Engineering, Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n. 46022 Valencia, SpainPhotogrammetry & Laser Scanning Research Group (GIFLE). Department of Cartographic Engineering, Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n. 46022 Valencia, SpainSystematic errors are present in laser scanning system observations due to manufacturer imperfections, wearing over time, vibrations, changing environmental conditions and, last but not least, involuntary hits. To achieve maximum quality and rigorous measurements from terrestrial laser scanners, a least squares estimation of additional calibration parameters can be used to model the a priori unknown systematic errors and therefore improve output observations. The selection of the right set of additional parameters is not trivial and requires laborious statistical analysis. Based on this requirement, this article presents an approach to determine the best set of additional parameters which provides the best mathematical solution based on a dimensionless quality index. The best set of additional parameters is the one which provides the maximum quality index (i.e. minimum value) for the group of observables, exterior orientation parameters and reference points. Calibration performance is tested using both a phase shift continuous wave scanner, FARO PHOTON 880, and a pulse-based time-of-flight system, Leica HDS3000. The improvement achieved after the geometric calibration is 30% for the former and 70% for the latter.http://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/II-5/219/2014/isprsannals-II-5-219-2014.pdf
spellingShingle J. L. Lerma
D. García-San-Miguel
Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
title Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters
title_full Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters
title_fullStr Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters
title_full_unstemmed Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters
title_short Self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners: selection of the best geometric additional parameters
title_sort self calibration of terrestrial laser scanners selection of the best geometric additional parameters
url http://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/II-5/219/2014/isprsannals-II-5-219-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jllerma selfcalibrationofterrestriallaserscannersselectionofthebestgeometricadditionalparameters
AT dgarciasanmiguel selfcalibrationofterrestriallaserscannersselectionofthebestgeometricadditionalparameters