Anatomy of diagnosis in a clinical encounter: how clinicians discuss uncertainty with patients
Abstract Background Studies consider the clinical encounter as linear, comprising six phases (opening, problem presentation, history-taking, physical examination, diagnosis, treatment and closing). This study utilizes formal conversation analysis to explore patient-physician interactions and underst...
Main Authors: | Maram Khazen, Erin E. Sullivan, Jason Ramos, Maria Mirica, Mark Linzer, Gordon D. Schiff, Andrew P. J. Olson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Primary Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01767-y |
Similar Items
-
A Software Tool for Calculating the Uncertainty of Diagnostic Accuracy Measures
by: Theodora Chatzimichail, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Analysis of diagnostic error cases among Japanese residents using diagnosis error evaluation and research taxonomy
by: Taku Harada, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Effectual Diagnostic Approach: A New Strategy to Achieve Diagnostic Excellence in High Diagnostic Uncertainty
by: Amano M, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
How does work environment relate to diagnostic quality? A prospective, mixed methods study in primary care
by: Gordon D Schiff, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Patient attitudes toward clinicians’ communication of diagnostic uncertainty and its impact on patient trust
by: Allyson C. Bontempo
Published: (2023-06-01)