Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test
Background: In patients with rotator cuff tears, Shoulder36 (Sh36) was compared to the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) to determine a broader use of Sh36 worldwide. Methods: Sh36, SST, “Constant score,” and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) were used to evaluate 230 patients (male, 116; fe...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018819060 |
_version_ | 1818399030467624960 |
---|---|
author | Junichi Kawakami Masafumi Gotoh Koumei Matsuura Kunichika Shin Ikuhisa Fujito Aya Tanaka Saho Matsunaga Takaki Imai Takashi Nagamatsu Masaki Karasuyama Toshiaki Ohota Kazuya Madokoro Naoto Shiba |
author_facet | Junichi Kawakami Masafumi Gotoh Koumei Matsuura Kunichika Shin Ikuhisa Fujito Aya Tanaka Saho Matsunaga Takaki Imai Takashi Nagamatsu Masaki Karasuyama Toshiaki Ohota Kazuya Madokoro Naoto Shiba |
author_sort | Junichi Kawakami |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: In patients with rotator cuff tears, Shoulder36 (Sh36) was compared to the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) to determine a broader use of Sh36 worldwide. Methods: Sh36, SST, “Constant score,” and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) were used to evaluate 230 patients (male, 116; female, 114) during the first visit, analyzed by staff blinded to the study. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for the statistical analysis. Results: The correlation coefficient between the Constant score and each domain in Sh36 was as follows: r = 0.68 (vs. pain, p < 0.01); r = 0.69 (vs. range of motion, p < 0.01); r = 0.74 (vs. muscle strength, p < 0.01); r = 0.62 (vs. general health, p < 0.01); r = 0.66 (vs. ability of daily living, p < 0.01); and r = 0.65 (vs. ability for sports, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between the JOA and each domain in Sh36 was as follows: r = 0.76 (vs. pain, p < 0.01); r = 0.73 (vs. range of motion, p < 0.01); r = 0.78 (vs. muscle strength, p < 0.01); r = 0.68 (vs. general health, p < 0.01); r = 0.71 (vs. ability of daily living, p < 0.01); and r = 0.70 (vs. ability for sports, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between the SST and each domain in Sh36 was as follows: r = 0.73 (vs. pain, p < 0.01); r = 0.70 (vs. range of motion, p < 0.01); r = 0.75 (vs. muscle strength, p < 0.01); r = 0.67 (vs. general health, p < 0.01); r = 0.69 (vs. ability of daily living, p < 0.01); and r = 0.64 (vs. ability for sports, p < 0.01). Conclusion: A strong association exists between the SST and each domain in the Sh36, in patients with rotator cuff tears ( r = 0.64–0.73), suggesting the usefulness of Sh36 for patient-based scoring. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T07:14:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-25a24ddf4ad54d8e874ddd7401c12090 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2309-4990 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T07:14:12Z |
publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-25a24ddf4ad54d8e874ddd7401c120902022-12-21T23:11:44ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902018-12-012710.1177/2309499018819060Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder TestJunichi Kawakami0Masafumi Gotoh1Koumei Matsuura2Kunichika Shin3Ikuhisa Fujito4Aya Tanaka5Saho Matsunaga6Takaki Imai7Takashi Nagamatsu8Masaki Karasuyama9Toshiaki Ohota10Kazuya Madokoro11Naoto Shiba12 Department of Rehabilitation, Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital, Haruno-machi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kurume University Medical Center, Kokubu-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital, Haruno-machi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital, Haruno-machi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Rehabilitation, Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital, Haruno-machi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Rehabilitation, Kugimiya Orthopedic & Rehabilitation Clinic, Tsurumi, Beppu, Oita, Japan Department of Rehabilitation, Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital, Haruno-machi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan Kurume University School of Medicine Graduate School, Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan Kurume University School of Medicine Graduate School, Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan Kurume University School of Medicine Graduate School, Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan Kurume University School of Medicine Graduate School, Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Physical Therapy, Technical School of Medical and Welfare Ryokuseikan, Nishishinmachi-machi, Tosu, Saga, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kurume University, Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, JapanBackground: In patients with rotator cuff tears, Shoulder36 (Sh36) was compared to the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) to determine a broader use of Sh36 worldwide. Methods: Sh36, SST, “Constant score,” and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) were used to evaluate 230 patients (male, 116; female, 114) during the first visit, analyzed by staff blinded to the study. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for the statistical analysis. Results: The correlation coefficient between the Constant score and each domain in Sh36 was as follows: r = 0.68 (vs. pain, p < 0.01); r = 0.69 (vs. range of motion, p < 0.01); r = 0.74 (vs. muscle strength, p < 0.01); r = 0.62 (vs. general health, p < 0.01); r = 0.66 (vs. ability of daily living, p < 0.01); and r = 0.65 (vs. ability for sports, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between the JOA and each domain in Sh36 was as follows: r = 0.76 (vs. pain, p < 0.01); r = 0.73 (vs. range of motion, p < 0.01); r = 0.78 (vs. muscle strength, p < 0.01); r = 0.68 (vs. general health, p < 0.01); r = 0.71 (vs. ability of daily living, p < 0.01); and r = 0.70 (vs. ability for sports, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between the SST and each domain in Sh36 was as follows: r = 0.73 (vs. pain, p < 0.01); r = 0.70 (vs. range of motion, p < 0.01); r = 0.75 (vs. muscle strength, p < 0.01); r = 0.67 (vs. general health, p < 0.01); r = 0.69 (vs. ability of daily living, p < 0.01); and r = 0.64 (vs. ability for sports, p < 0.01). Conclusion: A strong association exists between the SST and each domain in the Sh36, in patients with rotator cuff tears ( r = 0.64–0.73), suggesting the usefulness of Sh36 for patient-based scoring.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018819060 |
spellingShingle | Junichi Kawakami Masafumi Gotoh Koumei Matsuura Kunichika Shin Ikuhisa Fujito Aya Tanaka Saho Matsunaga Takaki Imai Takashi Nagamatsu Masaki Karasuyama Toshiaki Ohota Kazuya Madokoro Naoto Shiba Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
title | Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test |
title_full | Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test |
title_short | Usefulness of Shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears: Comparison with Simple Shoulder Test |
title_sort | usefulness of shoulder36 in rotator cuff tears comparison with simple shoulder test |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018819060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junichikawakami usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT masafumigotoh usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT koumeimatsuura usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT kunichikashin usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT ikuhisafujito usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT ayatanaka usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT sahomatsunaga usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT takakiimai usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT takashinagamatsu usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT masakikarasuyama usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT toshiakiohota usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT kazuyamadokoro usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest AT naotoshiba usefulnessofshoulder36inrotatorcufftearscomparisonwithsimpleshouldertest |