A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females

Background The body of literature considering caffeine as an ergogenic aid has primarily considered typically aerobic based exercise, male participants and moderate-to large-caffeine doses. With this in mind the aim of this project was to explore the effects of a low-caffeine dose upon maximal volun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgina Waller, Melissa Dolby, James Steele, James P. Fisher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2020-05-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/9144.pdf
_version_ 1827606348646318080
author Georgina Waller
Melissa Dolby
James Steele
James P. Fisher
author_facet Georgina Waller
Melissa Dolby
James Steele
James P. Fisher
author_sort Georgina Waller
collection DOAJ
description Background The body of literature considering caffeine as an ergogenic aid has primarily considered typically aerobic based exercise, male participants and moderate-to large-caffeine doses. With this in mind the aim of this project was to explore the effects of a low-caffeine dose upon maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and muscular endurance (time to task failure, TTF) at heavier-and lighter-loads. Methods Nineteen physically active, habitual caffeine consuming females randomly performed four testing conditions; two with a low-dose of caffeine (100 mg equating to mean = 1.5 ± 0.18 mg·kg−1) and two placebo conditions, where they performed a maximal strength test (MVC) knee extension at 45° followed by a task of relative muscular endurance (sustained isometric contraction for TTF) using either heavier-(70% MVC) and lighter-(30% MVC) loads. Each participant performed each load condition following both caffeine and placebo consumption. Immediately following cessation of the muscular endurance test participants were asked to report their rating of perceived effort (RPE) and rating of perceived discomfort (RPD). Results Analyses revealed a significant effect for caffeine upon MVC compared to placebo (p = 0.007). We also found a significantly greater TTF for the lighter-compared to the heavier-load condition (p < 0.0001); however, there was no significant effect comparing caffeine to placebo (p = 0.2368), but insufficient precision of estimates to infer equivalence in either lighter-(p = 0.750) or heavier-load (p = 0.262) conditions. There were no statistically significant effects for caffeine compared with placebo, or lighter-compared with heavier-loads, for RPE and RPD (all p > 0.05). RPE was statistically equivalent between caffeine and placebo for both lighter-(p = 0.007) and heavier-load (p = 0.002) conditions and RPD for heavier-(p = 0.006) but not lighter-load (p = 0.136). Discussion This is the first study to demonstrate a positive effect on strength from a low caffeine dose in female participants. However, it is unclear whether caffeine positively impacts upon relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads. Further, both RPE and RPD appear to be relatively similar during isometric tasks performed to task failure independently of caffeine supplementation or load. These findings may have implications for persons wishing to avoid side-effects or withdrawal symptoms associated with larger caffeine doses whilst still attaining the positive strength responses.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:35:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25afc15a1333485591dcf59e64e07b89
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:35:56Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-25afc15a1333485591dcf59e64e07b892023-12-03T10:56:52ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592020-05-018e914410.7717/peerj.9144A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in femalesGeorgina WallerMelissa DolbyJames SteeleJames P. FisherBackground The body of literature considering caffeine as an ergogenic aid has primarily considered typically aerobic based exercise, male participants and moderate-to large-caffeine doses. With this in mind the aim of this project was to explore the effects of a low-caffeine dose upon maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and muscular endurance (time to task failure, TTF) at heavier-and lighter-loads. Methods Nineteen physically active, habitual caffeine consuming females randomly performed four testing conditions; two with a low-dose of caffeine (100 mg equating to mean = 1.5 ± 0.18 mg·kg−1) and two placebo conditions, where they performed a maximal strength test (MVC) knee extension at 45° followed by a task of relative muscular endurance (sustained isometric contraction for TTF) using either heavier-(70% MVC) and lighter-(30% MVC) loads. Each participant performed each load condition following both caffeine and placebo consumption. Immediately following cessation of the muscular endurance test participants were asked to report their rating of perceived effort (RPE) and rating of perceived discomfort (RPD). Results Analyses revealed a significant effect for caffeine upon MVC compared to placebo (p = 0.007). We also found a significantly greater TTF for the lighter-compared to the heavier-load condition (p < 0.0001); however, there was no significant effect comparing caffeine to placebo (p = 0.2368), but insufficient precision of estimates to infer equivalence in either lighter-(p = 0.750) or heavier-load (p = 0.262) conditions. There were no statistically significant effects for caffeine compared with placebo, or lighter-compared with heavier-loads, for RPE and RPD (all p > 0.05). RPE was statistically equivalent between caffeine and placebo for both lighter-(p = 0.007) and heavier-load (p = 0.002) conditions and RPD for heavier-(p = 0.006) but not lighter-load (p = 0.136). Discussion This is the first study to demonstrate a positive effect on strength from a low caffeine dose in female participants. However, it is unclear whether caffeine positively impacts upon relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads. Further, both RPE and RPD appear to be relatively similar during isometric tasks performed to task failure independently of caffeine supplementation or load. These findings may have implications for persons wishing to avoid side-effects or withdrawal symptoms associated with larger caffeine doses whilst still attaining the positive strength responses.https://peerj.com/articles/9144.pdfStrengthMaximal voluntary contractionIsometricDiscomfortEffortErgogenic
spellingShingle Georgina Waller
Melissa Dolby
James Steele
James P. Fisher
A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
PeerJ
Strength
Maximal voluntary contraction
Isometric
Discomfort
Effort
Ergogenic
title A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
title_full A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
title_fullStr A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
title_full_unstemmed A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
title_short A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
title_sort low caffeine dose improves maximal strength but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier or lighter loads or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females
topic Strength
Maximal voluntary contraction
Isometric
Discomfort
Effort
Ergogenic
url https://peerj.com/articles/9144.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT georginawaller alowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT melissadolby alowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT jamessteele alowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT jamespfisher alowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT georginawaller lowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT melissadolby lowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT jamessteele lowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales
AT jamespfisher lowcaffeinedoseimprovesmaximalstrengthbutnotrelativemuscularenduranceineitherheavierorlighterloadsorperceptionsofeffortordiscomfortattaskfailureinfemales